Fitz: I can't help having things to do away from mafia. Here it is, anyway.
CA:
Three different random votes in the space of 24 hours, going from LmL, to Leech, to Prana. I know he wanted to start a bandwagon, but surely the easiest way to get a single bandwagon going is to keep your vote on one person, and keep pushing them? Granted, he then goes on to say that he believes Prana is actually scum, and his vote on Prana was not random-but why have two separate random votes during the RVS? Granted, this was early play, but it did make me suspicious.
He then "forgot about the thread" until iamausername pointed out that he was lying low to wait for his wagon to blow over. Since I was called scum and a liar for saying something similar about where my vote was placed, and why I hadn't changed it, I'm calling him out on this.
He bought up things I'd already explained (yes, I realise I'm doing exactly that), but he said he needed to reread to check he hadn't missed anything-he clearly did, because Xite pointed out that I had explained myself. At least I'm doing him the service of re-reading stuff and pointing these suspicions out.
He then tries to explain his bandwagoning gambit...and immediately says he didn't know where he was going with it. So, why do it and waste time?
He says he isn't engaged in the game. What's the point in him being here, then? Surely not being involved and engaged is anti-town?
I don't know if he's scum or not, and I don't consider him as anti-town or scummy as tw. So, I wouldn't support a CA lynch over a tw lynch.
Xite:
The fact that he started picking on me was a source of annoyance, particularly the way he went about it was because he was being so aggressive, but whatever. At least he was being fairly productive and trying to get some kind of information out of people. Althoug his "guess the scumreasoning" was silly, and a bit anti-town.
The fact he forgot Korashk in his scumlist, like iam said, is quite odd. Saying that, I'd done the same thing, so I don't think it's a scumtell.
He does have a lot of posts which are little more than just empty quotes or random one liners that aren't useful. I don't find that helpful at all, and it's a waste of everyone's time to have to read it. This continues all the way through-post #417 is a particular favourite-5 quotes, nothing added.
Post #196. Care to elaborate? (yes, 12 days too late. Apparently noone picked up on it.)
Your explanation of your gambit is bad. You tried to, by your own admission, make me look scummy by your attack, and my defense. Why on earth would you try and make other people look scummy unless you thought they were scum-you said you thought I was town. So why bother? You look scummy for making a townie look scum-it reeks of a mafia trying to lynch a townie so they don't have to nightkill.
His initial vote on tw was done with no reason. He quoted her post, and then put "interesting" and then voted her. I don't like this, even if tw is scum, he should've at least given a reason.
He was being quite confrontational again towards tw when she first replaced it-it's a terrible attitude to take.
He wants a wendy lynch if he gets lynched tonight, then IAU one afterwards. Is this because IAU is pushing for a lynch on his scum buddy CA? Plus, he doesn't give any reasoning for his suspicion, besides "based on his last post." What in his last post? Stop casting suspicion but then not backing it up?
I can't tell him off for his case on TW. I agree with most of the points.
Personally, I don't think Xite is scum. I would support a CA lynch over him, but still TW is most suspicious, imo anyway. Time's ticking
TW's last few posts. "META META META" Meta will defend me. No, no it won't. You're being distracting, and not really helpful. AND you try and push a no lynch again. I'm bored of it now.
So yeah,
vote: tomorrow wendy
she is the scummiest and most anti-town player so far, imo, and isn't really providing much more than raeg and meta.
Trans rights are human rights.
