Mini 1009 ÔÇô Popularity mafia (Game over - Mafia wins)

[Cuetlachtli]

And you are generalizing my suspicion of Mothrax. That slip is the starting point, but

he has not scumhunted

, his only concern so far has been defending himself. He only cares if he stays alive, not if we catch scum or not.

This point against Mothrax is inaccurate. Moth has consistently been an advocate for a Ecto / Dr / Nopoint lynch. He has even articulated why he thinks that slot is scummy. Isn't that scumhunting? What Moth hasn't done is try very hard to sell Nopoint's lynch to the village. In summary, Moth is scumhunting, but his approach to the game is very passive.

Vote count Day 2

(10 players alive = 6 to lynch before deadline)

(4) mothrax – ZONEACE, Tazaro, scotmany12, Thief,
(2) nopointinactingup – Cuethlachtli, mothrax
(2) Tazaro – nopointinactingup, Simenon
(1) Simenon – tumescence
(1) ZONEACE – Blackberry,

Not voting: ---

:arrow: Deadline Day 2 is September 3

[nopointinactingup]

Nopoint quit being a diva. You case on the Iron Man / Tazaro slot is vague and you need to clarify it. Regardless of whether you like me or not, clarification would be the PRO-TOWN thing to do.

Perhaps you haven't played with me before but know that though my cases are known to be very concise and generalized, it has been catching scum on a very effective streak.

That's why I so dislike your fluff and equivocation on trivial matters. Though you have more details to work on, you are way more prone to confirmation bias. Now if you want some clarification from my post, ask where you are confused at, don't expect me to lay it out for you.

For now my case against Tazaro is solely:

1> Ironman's post gives me a feeling that he's being measured and unnatural on what to post and very often taking the middle road, not a strong one-side perspective.
2> Tazaro has been posting fluffs and has done nothing to change my mind about that slot.

Cuet. You must really suck at understanding. And once again you find accusation in merely mention of differing opinions.

[Tazaro]

I don't know if today will give me a real opportunity to post in this thread. So consider this my Thursday post.

[Tazaro]

EBWOP: Actually, FRIDAY post.

[nopointinactingup]

Stop posting fluffs Tazaro, you are more and more scummy in my eyes.

[Tazaro]

Why aren't more people voting for mothrax? Don't you see his posts?

[Simenon]

Why isn't Tazaro dead? Existential questions for a new tomorrow.

[Tazaro]

Is that about lynching or hoping there's a vig?

[Simenon]

No vig in this game.
How many games are you playing Taz?

[Tazaro]

Seven.

[nopointinactingup]

Taz is digging his grave.

[Tazaro]

What is there in this thread to respond to? Are we in stagnation on the vote counts?

[nopointinactingup]

Start by telling us who your scumbuddies are?

[mothrax]

Maybe because scum driven wagons don't work Taz... good try though... here is a question for you: How have you not pinged my scumdar harder?

i see that the mothrax wagon is full of horsepower.

Quite true, if by horsepower you mean scumpower. Your constant fluff and craplogic are enough to make my stomach curl.

Unvote; Vote Tazaro

[Tazaro]

Whoa, strong language, buddy.

[Tazaro]

I mean, make your stomach curl? Mr. dramatic.

[mothrax]

Well, your posts on top of the stomach virus currently rocking my system.
Your vote for me with no logic is illplaced and when asked you simply respond with "other people are doing it" Way to hop on what you thought would be an easy wagon.
I also find it interesting that you have buddied up with zone quite a bit since he has replaced in. I will have to iso him too... but here you go for you: I am starting you at 50 on a scale of 1-100, 50 is null, 100 is town, 1 is scum.
0:Intro style post blah +0
1:defends me and drmy, claiming playstyle over analysis (bullshit, more like trying to buddy up to me; good try though, had me fooled for a bit.) -1
2:wants to get people unified +1
3: everyone stop scumhunting if someone makes one slip and autolynch that person. (good try, no one ever acts 100% townie Taz, one slip is not enough point for a lynch.) -1
4-8: fluff regarding drunk post. not going to give you -1 for each, but they do add up; -2
9: calling omgus on bb, when it was not there... -1
10: more buddying to me -1
11: vote on lurker CDB, pushing easy lynch -1
12-18 fluff diguised as VCA and setup speculation -3
19-20: buddying up to zone? that or just fluff. -1
21-23 pushing for CDB to provide content +2
24-25 deadline worries with hopes for CDB lynch, can be either town or scum, but judging by earlier posts, Iwould say scum wanting a mislynch. -2
26: fluff -0
27: buddying to cuet, vote for me with no logic -2
28: response to being called out on no logic behind vote with another explanation that explains nothing. -1
29-48 the rest is fluff and defending your craplogic, as well as more buddying to cuet and even some to scot -10
Conclusion: Taz= -29=scum
lynch him plz.

[ZONEACE]

I mean, make your stomach curl? Mr. dramatic.

DO you have a some sort of post restriction that requires you to make a bunch of useless, one line posts that have absolutely zero game content? I REALLY don't want to unvote mothrax because I'm convinced he's scum and should have been lynched on page five of the game, but you're giving me no choice with the way you're playing, nothing you have done could be even remotely seen as pro-town.

UNVOTE

VOTE: Taz

[Tazaro]

Are you saying you're switching from whom you think is scummy to whom you think is merely anti-town?

[Tazaro]

Are you saying you're switching from whom you think is scummy to whom you think is merely anti-town?

Follow-up on my own question: Zoneace, why do you feel the need to vote for someone of a rank below actual scumhood?

[ZONEACE]

Are you saying you're switching from whom you think is

scummy

to whom you think is merely

anti-town

?

There's no difference. Being anti-town is scummy. But that's not what I was saying. I was saying, that me changing my vote from mothrax wasn't because i didn't think he was scummy anymore, instead, because you have presented yourself as a threat to the town (and are infinitely more irritating).

Nice attempt to twist what I said though. Nice scum-move.

[Tazaro]

Are you more convinced he's scum or I'm scum? Why risk your vote on someone whom you're not as convinced about?

[scotmany12]

Are you more convinced he's scum or I'm scum? Why risk your vote on someone whom you're not as convinced about?

What makes you think that he doesn't believe both of you to be scum?

[Tazaro]

Are you more convinced he's scum or I'm scum? Why risk your vote on someone whom you're not as convinced about?

What makes you think that he doesn't believe both of you to be scum?

I think he believes us to both be scummy; the question is how sure he is in believing I'm scum versus believing mothrax is scum.

[mothrax]

Consider this Taz: your case on me sucks. My case on you does not. The difference between the two of us is when I play, I play. I make cases, and I find scum. I suggest you do the same now. If you want me lynched, then come up with a case other than "Other's pointed you out as scummy so you must be."
Incase you were wondering, I am just getting warmed up.