Not sure why you're asking DarkLightA for his meta on CSL, when CSL already provided meta himself with DarkLightA. So basically, this question has already been answered by CSL, which makes the question kind of redundant.Battle Mage wrote:What's your meta on CSL?
Since you're apparently not in RVS, could you mind explaining your vote on DarkLightA? Secondly, how in the world would RVS make scum certain who are likely masons? This makes no sense. Also not sure how DarkLightA relates to the brief discussion you had between him and JordanA24 regarding ending the RVS and how RVS is where scum can find likely masons (Which I said made no sense).Battle Mage wrote:Because it only helps the scum ascertain who are likely to be masons.
Unvote, Vote: DarkLightA
As you weren't in any danger of a lynch, I personally felt that claiming was seriously unecessary and you put yourself in danger of being Night Killed if you're town. Not liking this post at all. Only reason why I'm not raging about the self-vote is because you unvoted yourself.Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Battle Mage
Claim: Vanilla
No time to reply now. Will be on in a few hours if i'm still alive! If not, good luck.
BM
I think gandalf5166 was referring to his title below his username, not talking about jesters being in the game.DarkLightA wrote:@gandalf: It's an open game, there are no Jesters.
Did you read his later posts where he explains his vote on you? To be honest, your vote on DarkLightA was pretty bad from my perspective as well. And this is hypocritical of you considering that your vote lacked reasoning as well.Battle Mage wrote:No reasoning at all. Complete OMGUS.
@smashbro_of_the_sss (#93): Could you further elaborate on gandalf5166 being scummy? I remain unconvinced that gandalf5166 is scum.
#100 from DarkLightA: This post is really bad. The case on Haylen seems like he's wants to appear that he's not tunneling on Battle Mage instead of a genuine case. Unlike Battle Mage's self-vote, Haylen's vote appeared a lot more random and it was more evident that it was during the RVS phase. Self-voting during RVS is not a scum tell, unless it was an intentional self-hammer and even then, the chance of RVS self-hammers happening are next to zero. Also, how are jokes and being relaxed a scum tell? Yes we should be serious during serious phases, but that doesn't mean jokes and being relaxed is a scum tell unless the former is excessively abused. DarkLightA is officially streching his case.
Your reasons for voting Haylen in #100 were just terrible. molestargazer asked if you had anything else. Because you have nothing else to add to your case, your case on Haylen will remain to be scummy.DarkLightA wrote:No, we're on page 5. I don't think anyone does.
Care to comment on something game related instead of laughing at posts that we can look back at later that can help us find scums?DarkLightA wrote:^^ HAHA @ 103-111!
@zwetschenwasser: I don't see how gandalf5166 is vote hopping. He's only made two votes so far, one was RVS and one was serious, which he later unvoted. You on the other hand have made four votes and you've been more wishy-washy with them and your vote on gandalf5166 was pretty bad as well, not to mention hypocritical of you.
Reads in the game/Other Thoughts/Conclusions/Misc.
Currently, my reads are divided into four groups, Town, Neutral, Scum, and Lurkers.
Town:
gandalf5166, molestargazer, Jahudo, (To a lesser extend), JordanA24.Neutral:
None so far.Scum:
DarkLightA, Battle Mage, zwetschenwasser, (To a lesser extend) HaylenLurkers:
smashbro_of_the_SSS, CSLMy top suspect is DarkLightA. While I thought his attack against Battle Mage was slightly pro-town, he turns a complete 180 on his play starting with his horrible case on Haylen which he fails to support. He isn't even voting someone now, instead simply FoSing zwetschenwasser without really explaining his suspicion on him. The scumminess of his recent posts exceed Battle Mage's post.
Battle Mage is also suspicious. While his play is better later on, his early play was pretty scummy, and he's a decent candidate for today. Will support his lynch if DarkLightA doesn't get through.
Liked JordanA24's quick case on zwetschenwasser. Not only is he hypocritical in calling gandalf5166 out for vote hopping, he is completely wrong about this. Later explanation about this doesn't change my mind about this. He's an okay lynch IMO.
Haylen isn't as scummy as my other three suspects, but I really wish she would provide more substance in the game. There isn't really much going in the eight posts she has. Of course as active lurking is my only reason for suspecting Haylen, I'll keep a closer eye out for her.
What keeps me from voting Battle Mage is that his meta is known to be scummy. Therefore, it's harder to judge him whenever or not he's truly worthy of a vote, although that doesn't give him a free pass either. DarkLightA has no such excuse.
Vote: DarkLightA
FoS: Battle Mage, zwetschenwasser
FomS: Haylen
I added a Lurkers section because I haven't seen enough of them to come to a solid conclusions about them. They need to produce contents and produce them now.
Okay wow. Less then 130 posts so far and we're about a week from the deadline. Considering this is a twelve-player set-up, I'd expected a lot more out of this game. Pick up the pace and get moving, we have scums to lynch and only a limited time to do so. Everyone should commit at least one post to the game every real day and maybe the game won't stagnate so much.
(the analysis was good though, not so sure about him bringing up the deadline as if it's a matter of urgency, there's still a week left, and still time to let the game grow organically rather than rush into any mistakes) 
