Furcolow wrote:still waiting on jason to unvote
Why, im
VERY
comfortable with my vote right now.
Furcolow wrote:jasonT1981 wrote:but you would want scum to kill a roleblocker?
Fur: Fair enough... It seemed to me you were trying to dirty me. My mistake..
As for jumping on the Mallow wagon, well at the time I was convinced he was a good lynch... you will see after he claims I do research on the claimed role and call him out as not on the side of ghostbusters. And even provide a link as evidence...
The third party talk is what made me unvote.. as we hunt scum first, not 3rd party. I later realized he actually had not claimmed 3rd party like someone (cant remember if it was reck or CT right now) had been trying to make out
As for Sotty/Zang... I just don't really see enough evidence to convince me right now.
"fair enough" you say? if you're relenting, why have you yet to unvote? you are leaving scummy players the ability to devise some made up "argument" to lynch me. I am not BloodCovenant, and I have no idea why he was playing the way he was. He was playing like a plum idiot. It's good he didn't take any spotlight, but he could have at least tried to make a case or two.
The evidence doesn't come from their slot, and I'll give that it could be Coach Trav scum trying to buddy with a townie, so I'm willing to even lynch reck on d2 as opposed to Zang if people convince me.
Wait, seeriously? I am voting on evidence... not voting without. I do not have a policy of lynch lurkers over scummy. IF you read up, you will see I was one of the only ones being vocal over Starbuck and other lurkers which lead to tempers being lost. Please, stop this blatent misrep on me. My vote is on you. Deal with it.
Furcolow wrote:
jasonT1981 wrote:d3x wrote:
jT240
- I actually don't have a problem with Voting someone who is getting replaced. A scummy slot is a scummy slot; given you can only place so much weight behind that read once the replacement starts playing. I don't see anything inately wrong with the general theory of Voting in such a circumstance.
Yea, I can understand.... I usually unvote just as a courtasy giving time for the new person to catch up and not be subject to a lynch before a replacement is found/caught up... this happened in a recent game I played in where a player replaced out... but still got lynched before a replacement was found.
Explain your vote on me, then
Your... joking, right? go look at my case on BC.... then these
jasonT1981 wrote:Hmmmm with everything BC did, that appeal to emotion does not help your case.
jasonT1981 wrote:Furcolow wrote:
Needless to say, I don't want to die, but it might be for the best if the town can end up pulling together and winning. If you all don't want me to HELP you win, then lynch me. If you all want me to help you win via scumhunting, having another vote as a town,
and fosing scummy ass fucks
, then I will.
)
hmmm bolded worrys me actually. I have found scum are usually the ones who come out with lines like that. I would like to see you scumhunt. You can still scumhunt with people voting you.
[/quote]
jasonT1981 wrote:OK I agree with Zach there.
Ontop of BC behaviour, your appeal to emotion and fear in your first post, and you trying to make me look bad in your other... as well as deflection makes me feel already you are scum... also
Furcolow wrote:
Am I a good lynch for town? Not a bad one
. I'm not a vigilante or anything really important, and if you all feel you can get information out of my lynch that will enable the town to win, go for it.
So, your not a bad lynch for town... OK, by your own admission of not being a bad lynch I will
vote:Furcolow
[/quote]
then lets add this shall we
Furcolow wrote:up to page 15, my reads are as such:
Town: tazaro/lynchmepls, jasont1981, myself
leaning town: xScorpion, ScottBrosius
neutral: everyone not on these lists
leaning scum: reck, mallowgeno
scum: coachtravis, zang/sottyrules
followed by
Furcolow wrote:sottyrulez wrote:^ Lynch this guy.
your slot is scummy, and has been. you are coach travis's scumbuddy, and i'm outting you, so of course you want to lynch me.
with a vote going.....
Furcolow wrote:unvote
vote: mallowgeno
this is the guy who had the absurd claim, right?
Your vote goes on someone you are leaning scum too, instead of your actual scum reads.
[quote="Furcolow"
If you think I'm scum, give me one good point, and I'll refute it. Nothing can stick to me because I have no idea who is what other than myself.[/quote]
Everything BC did, as well as the points currently on you. Plently of things. Nothing can stick to you, why not? you are responsible for your actions. Why did you not vote for CT or Zach, you know the two who you proclaim are scum?
Furcolow wrote:sottyrulez wrote:^ Lynch this guy.
your slot is scummy, and has been. you are coach travis's scumbuddy,
and i'm outting you, so of course you want to lynch me.
SottyRulz was on the BC/your wagon long before you came into the game.... his wanting your lynch is no surprise. Again this is a blatent attempt to misrep. You have not outted Zach, I see no evidence as of yet good enough to convince me. Lets look at Sottys vote and what he said after the vote shall we?
sottyrulez wrote:Unvote: Vote: Bloodcovenent
In 409 he mischaracterizes how Mallow's role works in order to create a false dillema where we just HAVE to lynch him or he will end up hurting town.
Also, docfishing.
sottyrulez wrote:
BC/d3x/Ghost ← scumz
sottyrulez wrote:BloodCovenent wrote:
mallowgeno wrote:Liam just told me it won't block the kill. Therefore I don't think I will use it.
What the fuck..... Use it God damnit... Other wise scum are very likely to kill you.
lol. Awesome.
Come on people, spots on the BloodCovenent wagon are going at a bargain price!
sottyrulez wrote:Let it rest for today Jason and put your vote on the extremely scummy BloodCovenent.
sottyrulez wrote:His role is still going to be the same no matter who ends up playing it.
Zachrulez wrote:Mod: Jason Unvoted
An error I hope will soon be rectified.
All things Zach said about BC before he replaced out/ you replaced in... so to say he wants your lynch because you outted him is a blatent as hell misrep and an attempt to dirty someone.
OK. You said you wanted one good point to refute as if there was no case on you..... well lets give you some.
1)You say your lynch is not bad for town
2)Appeal to emotion and fear
3)Shifting attention to lurkers
4)Trying to make me look bad with your attack on me over lurkers and my vote.
5)Calling CT and Zach your top two for scum then voting claimed roleblocker.
6)Wanting me to explain my vote....you know full well the reasons. A cheap attempt at making it look like my vote had no substance.
7)Everything BC did before you. As that slot, you are still responsible for that.
you asked for one, I give you 7... alongh with my case and reasons for my vote/reasons why I won't unvote.
