Newbie 988-Apocalypse(Over)-Scum win

[Beanman]

Lol dekes, yes, try to get more people on my wagon... Further your doom....

[yabbaguy]

...he says with the Ellipses of Uncertainty.

Who's scum? Your vote needs to be on Mafia.

ludacris

Wrong spelling. America's bad influences are taking over.

[Dekes]

EBWOP2: "if you flip town"

[yabbaguy]

Ah, here it is:

4- Play to your win condition. Remember, you win EVEN IF YOU DIE. That therefore means you need to be consistently trying to get your antagonists eliminated. Scum outing scumbuddies can and has force-abandonned a game and probably will get you permabanned from the site. As Town, you're trying to vote for Mafia. Selfvoting and giving up is... well... anti-town, because you know for fact that the lynch is going to be on someone who's pro-town. That's not gonna win you the game.

[Beanman]

Yeah about that yabba, sometimes, IC's are wrong....

[Adrien C]

So now you give us an ultimatum? Bean, it's only Day 1. More information will come through soon to help us figure everything out. For the most part, I've gotten pro-town reads from you before this, so take the vote off yourself and we'll sort this out.

[yabbaguy]

Ellipses of Uncertainty.

I am so fucking right and you know it. Unvote faster please.

[yabbaguy]

Beanman is obvtown, btw.

[Beanman]

lol yabba

unvote:vote dekes

Seriously, the guy was srsly pushing my wagon.. WHO DOES THIS?!?

[Adrien C]

Yeah, what Dekes was doing is slightly suspicious. I'm pretty sure Bean is town as well.

[yabbaguy]

Who's scum, Adrien?

[Dekes]

Lol dekes, yes, try to get more people on my wagon... Further your doom....

Again you're putting words into my mouth.

And so, it's no rocksolid, undeniable proof-consisting case after all? Huh?
I'm now leaning towards stubborn, egomaniacal town. Which is not good or helpful either.

Unvote

Now can we wait for other people to talk/get replaced?

[Tuxhedoh]

I have not had time to put together any legitimate claims against anyone at this time, though with Bean voting himself, I thought I'd poke my head in and let you know that I'm still watching and still attempting to compile cases.... I guess I'm active lurking, but I'm here. Which is more than we can say for Kye and Mont....

[yabbaguy]

^Scum or no, I agree with that. Let's let the game cool down a bit.

[yabbaguy]

with Dekes. Not sure why I ignored the force-preview.

[Adrien C]

I'll give my take on who could be scum on that 1-10 point system with 1 being obv-scum and 10 being obv-town.

Kyle (until replaced): 2
Monty (until replaced): 3
Dekes: 4
Tux: 6
Tan: 6
Pacman: 7
Yabba: 7
Bean: 9.5

That's just how I'm seeing things.

[Adrien C]

To add on to that, I am willing to give any replacements a chance to redeem their slot when they come in.

[Beanman]

Lol dekes, yes, try to get more people on my wagon... Further your doom....

Again you're putting words into my mouth.

And so, it's no rocksolid, undeniable proof-consisting case after all? Huh?
I'm now leaning towards stubborn, egomaniacal town. Which is not good or helpful either.

Unvote

Now can we wait for other people to talk/get replaced?

I am not putting words in your mouth.

Played perfectly. Lazy opportunistic scum to a T. I proved my case with factual evidence on the both of them, now I would like to prove my case with hard undeniable evidence, that these two are mafia. I am so freaking sure these two are mafia, with their really badly "ZOMG YOU PARAPHRASED ME BEANMAN!!!! YOU HAVE TO USE THE SAME WORDS I DID OR YOU MISQUOTED ME!!!!!" and they're "why I am so lazy that I poorly explained myself, oh but here, i was being sarcastic... HOW COULD YOU NOT SEE THAT!!!"

I just wanted to address this part. The second part is just plain ludacris and Beanman is getting more and more megalomanic and thinks he can win this thing on his own.
I never said you have to quote me. I said an Iso would suffice just so that people could see what you were referring to. Again you're making facts out of absolutely nothing. And this time in caps lock, too. Very convincing.
As for me being lazy and opportunistic: Yep, that's why it took me 90 minutes to work on a reply for your so-called "not-the-real-thing-it's-just-a-trap-case". And that's why I backed up every single of my votes with solid and subjective reasoning.



I'm really looking forward to your real case.

This is you trying to convince people that my actions are suspicious. What that is doing is furthering my wagon, as people are more likely to say, he's suspicious, he must be town. I am NOT putting words in your mouth. You pushed my wagon! this is FACT!

[Beanman]

EBWOP "he must *NOT* be town.

[Beanman]

@dekes, you stated you had a protown read on me, i gave a legit case on you, and you omgus voted me. You did, you can say w/e you want, but people don't say, "your town, then immediate after being FoS'd "OMG YOUR SCUM" no matter how you slice it, it's omgus, plain and simple.

[Dekes]

*sigh* This was me telling we where you were wrong. Outright wrong just to strenghten your case against me. Telling people are wrong =/= telling people are suspicious. I was merely showing town that the intentions of my actions have always been genuine and backed up by my own reasoning.

Preview Edit:
No OMGSUS is simply voting because somebody voted for you. Look it up. I backed up my post with a lot of post that you don't seem to find reply-worthy at all. And I concluded with the vote that wasn't reasoned on OMGSUS. Look it up, it's right on the last page.

[Dekes]

EBWOP: Missing a comma. "No, OMGSUS[...]"

[yabbaguy]

Reasoned OMGUS is oxymoronic.

[Jackabomb]

Vote count 1.13
Pacman-

Montgomery, kyle99;

Tanstalas-

;

Dekes-

Beanman;

kyle99-

Tuxhedoh;

Beanman-

Tanstalas;

yabbaguy-

;

Montgomery-

;

Not voting-

yabbaguy, Dekes, Adrien C, Pacman;

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch or no lynch.
10 days until deadline.

[Beanman]

You backed up your post with a lot of fluff that read to me as OMGUS. Either way, my case on you has proven to be quite legitimate, as NO ONE, but your BW buddy, has a pro-town read on you...