Shattered Viewpoint wrote:unvote
I must say, SmashBro is doing a FINE JOB OF LURKING. We'll get to him tomorrow.
For now,
Vote: enigma
Sorry, but for the last few days, I've had unexpectantly little time to the computer. However, I do agree with Paltry, you should have asked for a prod so that you could stop me from lurking. I know you said you would worry about me tomorrow, but why not ask for a prod on me AND vote for Enigma.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Has joined two major wagons, and gives little reason for each. (First one in RVS)
Zajnet wrote:It's a tarp!
VOTE: Shattered Viewpoint
Does not answer the RVS questions involving meta and win loss record. Is seen as suspicious, still hasn't answered the questions.
unvote when not voting gambit
scum skim, town doesn't (brought up discussion, but not a tell)
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:I unvoted to see if you schlubs were paying attention.
Two of you are.
The unvote gamit isn't too bad in my eyes, but I don't really like the post. Not really sure what to think about it.
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:Avoiding questions?? What are you hiding?
unvote
Vote: silverbullet
You accuse someone of avoiding questions after not answering those questions yourself?
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:silverbullet999 wrote:Fineee I'll answer... I was looking and couldn't find the game... though I could have sworn I played with beefster before... Maybe I'm losing my mind as beef didn't show any love to me in his posts.
This -- is totally, completely scummy. YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS FOR BEEFSTER. You are answering them FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OF US.
Thus, you are trying to
keep information to yourself.
Scum.
Again, you just called someone scummy for the same things that you did.
Has seemed to avoid telling many opinions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In conclusion, (sorry if it's repetitive, the cases, but i wanted to see it all out in front of me.) Enigma seems dangerous, but not definitely scum, since we really don't know anything about him.
ConfidAnon wrote:Good point.
So, Enigma, who do you suspect?
^^^seconded^^^
As for the other two, there is more evidence on Shattered Viewpoint, but I'm not ready to switch my vote to him. There's some kind of vibe I'm getting from him that may be townish, but his actions have seemed scummish. I'll need to think on this, but I'm satisfied with my vote on Zajnet at the moment.