Read my previous game, Starbuck. I consider myself a "dive-in" player. Another suitable term is "blitzkrieg." I didn't vote you; that gives me town points, right guysCoach Travis wrote:Vote:Starbuckbecause we need to get as many people into this RVS as possible. I don't like Tazaro's constant OMGUS voting and unvotes, however.
Now you're trying to act TOO TOWNIE! WHO WOULD DO THAT BUT SCUMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tazaro wrote:Read my previous game, Starbuck. I consider myself a "dive-in" player. Another suitable term is "blitzkrieg." I didn't vote you; that gives me town points, right guysCoach Travis wrote:Vote:Starbuckbecause we need to get as many people into this RVS as possible. I don't like Tazaro's constant OMGUS voting and unvotes, however.
Tazaro wrote:Ghostbusters and other people... who? The Scooby Doo gang? I'd vote to lynch someone who claims as Shaggy; that junky with the munchies can't solve jacks***.
its kinda a give me a reason to vote you... feels weird to me. xRECx is usually pretty active from what I remember, we have played together a few times in the past.Tazaro wrote:EBWOP: I mean, seeing your activity in D1, xRECKONERx; and GhostWriter, make me vote for you for an actual reason.
Actually yea, it is kinda constant... I vote him, right away he votes me... BC votes him right away he votes BC, on page 2 he has OMGUS'ed twice... I can see how CT means.. maybe constant is not the right word, but his 2 of his 3 votes are OMGUS, thats pretty constent to me... maybe repeated would have been a better word.xRECKONERx wrote:"constant"?Coach Travis wrote:Vote:Starbuckbecause we need to get as many people into this RVS as possible. I don't like Tazaro's constant OMGUS voting and unvotes, however.
Unvote; Vote: Coach Travis
Not a random vote.
In envokes the WIFOM that is in keeping with my 2nd point... AHHHHH. I have seen people like Taz go both ways. Still happy with my vote for now though, how he responds under this pressure will be interesting I think.Tazaro wrote:I'm just an eager beaver who wants action, Coach Travis.
1)In the post in which the mod wrote the first write-up (including Kylie's death), the mod made reference to other people besides the Ghostbusters who have had experience with the ghost thing.jasonT1981 wrote:Tazaro wrote:Ghostbusters and other people... who? The Scooby Doo gang? I'd vote to lynch someone who claims as Shaggy; that junky with the munchies can't solve jacks***.Unless I missed something blindingly obivious, what do you mean other people..... no one had mentioned other people had they? Well, aside from you and the Casper crack
not sure I like this either
its kinda a give me a reason to vote you... feels weird to me. xRECx is usually pretty active from what I remember, we have played together a few times in the past.Tazaro wrote:EBWOP: I mean, seeing your activity in D1, xRECKONERx; and GhostWriter, make me vote for you for an actual reason.
Taz, one last question for you. Have you played much mafia before, offsite I mean? or even on an ALT account here on MS I see you are fairly new to MS itself only joining a few weeks ago. I would be interesting to know your level of experience in Mafia
It was an adlib; I write by ear, and the EBWOP of the statement I made about xRECKONERx did not seem to be a full enough post. And I said a similar thing to a player called Uite in my Newbie 943 game; I told him to make a slip-up if he's scum because I tried to find scumminess about him but it wasn't happening at that point. So make a scum slip if you're scum, GhostWriter. You're a ghost, but finding scumminess about that wasn't happening at the point in time in which I made that post in which I voted for you.GhostWriter wrote:Then explain the "make me vote for you for an actual reason" bit that you directed towards me.
It is almost like you did want to start building a case on Ghost simply due to his username....And backed off because no one else was buying it. I don't like that. But he does make a good point about BC and a possible scumslip.Tazaro wrote: GhostWriter. You're a ghost, but finding scumminess about that wasn't happening at the point in time in which I made that post in which I voted for you.
Tazaro wrote:Double post: And jason, targetting BOTH? I don't believe I've said a negative thing about xRECKONERx. I'll be fair, but he seems nice so far. And that's probably his personality that he brings no matter if he's scum or town.
Hmmm, maybe I misread into your post. Are you saying an excuse to vote xRECx and Ghostwriter.... or just ghostwriter... and are looking forward to seeing D1 activity from REC. And that this is two seperate sentances?Tazaro wrote:EBWOP: I mean, seeing your activity in D1, xRECKONERx; and GhostWriter, make me vote for you for an actual reason.
He, Coach Travis, perceives my game play as OMGUSing on jason and on BC. If it's possible that a town member doesn't like OMGUSing, xReck, then that dislike is not worthy of being a reason to non-randomly vote for Coach. I'm going to...xRECKONERx wrote:Constant just seems like it comes from scum logic.
Like, "let me overblow what's really happening by using a word that will make people go OMG HE'S DOING IT CONSTANTLY"
I can't explain it well, but you should be able to see what I'm saying.
It is OMGUS though... you even said in your vote on me...Tazaro wrote:He, Coach Travis, perceives my game play as OMGUSing on jason and on BC.If it's possible that a town member doesn't like OMGUSing, xReck, then that dislike is not worthy of being a reason to non-randomly vote for Coach.
And voting BC in the very next post after voting you is OMGUS also....Tazaro wrote:jasonT1981
This is OMGUS. Sweet.
It wasn't serious OMGUS; I thought genuine OMGUS would be a non-random vote and trying to rationalize that vote with specious arguments??jasonT1981 wrote:It is OMGUS though... you even said in your vote on me...Tazaro wrote:He, Coach Travis, perceives my game play as OMGUSing on jason and on BC.If it's possible that a town member doesn't like OMGUSing, xReck, then that dislike is not worthy of being a reason to non-randomly vote for Coach.