Mini 1000: The Brave and the Beautiful (Game Over)

[Ythan]

So, he doesn't think all 3 of them are scum, but includes them all in a list of which one will be getting his vote... makes no sense.

It actually makes plenty of sense. Do you think that every player you suspect is scum? Together? The fact that I even explained this later, in a post you quoted no less, and yet I still have to spoon feed it to you, is annoying.

I agree that OMGUS and prolonging the RVS are anti-town, but in light of Millar's flip and Furco's hammer I think we can safely assume Furcolow is just kind of a noob.

I see no reason to make this assumption.

It's easy to get past town's scrutiny by focusing on someone like Furco who puts such a huge target on his back.

And you're still entirely dismissing claims made against him and acting like only scum could attack a player like Furc. You take a lot of opportunities to attempt to paint me as scum for this.

Additionally, a lot of your points as to why I am scum assume that I am scum already, particularly the bits about bussing. They mean nothing really.

Okay, you're unsatisfied... good for you I guess?

What is this but whining to fill more space?

More wiki tells but still nothing substantive.

More of you defending the fuck out of Furc by dismissing any accusation I make against him. Baselessly.

[Muffin]

My point stands. If you read my big post, the point was to point out how you haven't done any scumhunting. You claim to have made "accusations" but they've got no substance. Put together a case and then we'll talk. Also you haven't responded to the blatant and somewhat bizarre lie you made in post 704: http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p2390966

[Ythan]

When you're entire case is that I'm not hunting and you simply dismiss any instance of me doing so there is nothing for me to do but scoff.

As for the next bit. When you're facing accusations that you're attempting to paint me as scum by dismissing my arguments, a good place not to start is asking me to explain why I lied instead of asking me for clarification. You're overeager to skip past your summary questioning. As for the explanation you're likely to ignore, I said from the start that my PM indicated that I was visited in the night. Furc's dumb ass asked me to explain how I knew I had been visited. Beyond what I had plainly stated in the very post that he must have read in order to ask such a question, I don't know anything. I said that my PM indicated as much.

[SaintKerrigan]

"So, you wanna woohoo in my parents' basement later tonight?"

- excerpt from

How to Pick Up Hot Video Game Chicks

by Ivan O. Lyfe

Vote Count 2.1

(2) ShottytotheBody: Furcolow, MagnaofIllusion
(1) Furcolow: Robocopter87
(1) Ythan: Muffin

FU FURC

Don't post after you're dead, please. I'd really rather not have to resurrect you, change your alignment to neutral survivor, and modkill you...at least not before my shiny new titanium banhammer comes in the mail.

[Ythan]

Seems like a pointless and arbitrary way to "punish" someone who's not actually in the game anymore.

[Shotty to the Body]

More affectionate? What does that even mean? Wall of text... tl;dr. Still didn't answer my question Iec. Go back to before the D1 lynch if you can't remember.

[SaintKerrigan]

Ythan, if and when you run your own game, you can punish people for posthumous rule violations in whatever way you like. Here, Reaper and I make the rules, and punish lawbreakers as

we

see fit. Am I making myself clear?

[Robocopter87]

SK are you guy or girl? Dumb loss of Gender tags.

[SaintKerrigan]

SK are you guy or girl? Dumb loss of Gender tags.

Dude (Looks Like a Lady)

[Robocopter87]

Well, if that means dude, then

YESSIR!

[Iecerint]

Iec where is your case again?

Is this what you're talking about? Because...what case are you talking about? If you make this more specific, I can try to answer your question. "More affectionate" => gimme love => moar content plz.

@ Y

Yep, Ythill must be it. I read a game he was in for some reason or other; I assume it was an old Scummies thread, cuz I dunno why I'd read a random game otherwise. I remember him commenting postgame that wall of text posting is a favored scum strategy because people give you the benefit of the doubt for being workmanlike, etc.

Your framing this as some kind of "scummy backtrack" is very silly, because the parsimonious explanation is that I read this like last October or whenever and can't remember details. The scum motivations for "lying" about something easily verifiable like this (especially by the person I'm making the comments toward) are near zero.

Yes, you never EXPLICITLY said you thought there were two Kerrigans. However, the stuff that you DID say implied that you believed as much. Your refusal to elaborate on your own beliefs prevents us from being quite sure of what your position on anything is, so.

[Muffin]

When you're entire case is that I'm not hunting and you simply dismiss any instance of me doing so there is nothing for me to do but scoff.[/quote[Okay, please quote what you believe to be instances of scumhunting.

As for the next bit. When you're facing accusations that you're attempting to paint me as scum by dismissing my arguments, a good place not to start is asking me to explain why I lied instead of asking me for clarification. You're overeager to skip past your summary questioning. As for the explanation you're likely to ignore, I said from the start that my PM indicated that I was visited in the night. Furc's dumb ass asked me to explain how I knew I had been visited. Beyond what I had plainly stated in the very post that he must have read in order to ask such a question, I don't know anything. I said that my PM indicated as much.

Challenging someone to quote where you stated something seems like you're implying you didn't state it.

[Muffin]

Better post this before I forget:

I'll be VLA from the morning of the 23rd until Monday the 26th

when I get back from Quebec city.

[ReaperCharlie]

Better post this before I forget:

I'll be VLA from the morning of the 23rd until Monday the 26th

when I get back from Quebec city.

Noted. But don't blame me if you happen to get lynched solely out of spite.

It's a girl

, by the way! w0000000000000000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

[Robocopter87]

Congratulations ReaperCharlie!!!

Just try not to teach her how to play Mafia lolz

[MagnaofIllusion]

We need more input from bv310 and kdub.

We need less spam from various others.

We need more vote on Shotty.

Get to work people!

[ReaperCharlie]

Just try not to teach her how to play Mafia lolz

NEVER! I will NOT corrupt her soul!!!

[Robocopter87]

Don't worry, Reaper, you'll be a fine Father.

[ReaperCharlie]

Thanks for your vote of confidence!

[bv310]

Just try not to teach her how to play Mafia lolz

NEVER! I will NOT corrupt her soul!!!

There's no escaping destiny.

[bv310]

Also, probably should have mentioned this before, but my action last night failed too. Anybody else thinking global roleblock?

[Iecerint]

It's possible if Ythan's stalker was scum.

Careful how you respond to bv's speculation @ all.

[Robocopter87]

I think that bv310's speculation is very plausible. May I ask, was there any flavor with your Roleblock Message? If so, what did it say?

We can find out if it was a possible global if the flavor was the same.

[Muffin]

Also, probably should have mentioned this before, but my action last night failed too. Anybody else thinking global roleblock?

2 kills went through, so I doubt it.

[Robocopter87]

Well, its obv a mafia Roleblock so it wouldn't effect them, duh.