Mini 983: It Got Worse (GAME OVER)

[RedCoyote]

What does this pinata do now?

[SpyreX]

Seriously maybe I'm being screwed with but I sure haven't seen any pinata love.

[Amished]

Seriously maybe I'm being screwed with but I sure haven't seen any pinata love.

Does it help that I love you?

[SpyreX]

Does your love involve stealing my sweet pinata gifts?

If not then yes

[UncertainKitten]

I don't have any known pinata bonus either. It is possible it's a hidden bonus though.

[SpyreX]

This gaaameee

[Amished]

I don't have any known pinata bonus either. It is possible it's a hidden bonus though.

+1

@Spy: I don't steal. (unless it's your heart ).

inb4 gay joke.

[SpyreX]

Dont worry you'll just get bit and turned into a vampire so its all good.

HRMMM PINATA.

Anywho, digress aside: SPS + Rope = Happy Campers

[UncertainKitten]

I disagree. I could be convinced though. Got a cool case?

[SpyreX]

I forgot he was playing - he faded into obscurity after fake dayprotectgate.

And has done nothing, but sure hopped in quick to respond to me saying I forgot he was playing.

[UncertainKitten]

I dunno. I ISO'd him. It reads as busy town. He needs to produce soon though. As I said, I could be convinced ^-^

[Amished]

Fading into the background isn't nearly as cool as a reason to vote as actively scummy (when active)...

[SaintKerrigan]

I don't have any known pinata bonus either. It is possible it's a hidden bonus though.

Perhaps.

The point I was trying to make, SC, is that I hadn't gotten a pinata gift (that I'm aware of) yet, and this seems to be true of other people as well. If you had admitted you had a pinata gift, that would've made you very suspicious. As it stands, since people outed that they didn't have pinata stuff before I forced you into an admission, my plan won't work anymore.

You still get a FoS for not being cooperative.

FoS: StrangerCoug

[UncertainKitten]

I don't think SC had any cause to be "cooperative". His reasoning seems sound to me.

[SaintKerrigan]

EBWOP:

UnFoS
FoS: StrangerCoug

@ UK: He wasn't giving away his role type by admitting whether he had a pinata gift or not. He just claimed incriminating information, which does not necessarily mean investigative role.

[StrangerCoug]

@ UK: He wasn't giving away his role type by admitting whether he had a pinata gift or not. He just claimed incriminating information, which does not necessarily mean investigative role.

I was

SPECIFICALLY TOLD

that Amished targeted somebody. That's why I asked him what I did.

[UncertainKitten]

Except it does. He's right about the flavor of the investigation mattering. And keeping that hidden being a good idea.

[RedCoyote]

I was

SPECIFICALLY TOLD

that Amished targeted somebody.

By somebody do you actually mean magnus?

[LlamaFluff]

Can we stop all going "lol role info" already and get back to scumhunting? Will get recaught up tomorrow.

[StrangerCoug]

I was

SPECIFICALLY TOLD

that Amished targeted somebody.

By somebody do you actually mean magnus?

God damn it, how much about my information do you guys have to ask?

...Actually, I think this one I can safely answer: No. I was not told whom Amished targeted specifically. He admitted targeting whom I think he did, so while I think I'm in the right to keep an eye on him, I want to focus on SaintKerrigan.

[Ythan]

I'll try to catch up and most something meaningful. Having to read through 20+ pages when you get in does not make for a smooth transition.

[SaintKerrigan]

I was

SPECIFICALLY TOLD

that Amished targeted somebody.

By somebody do you actually mean magnus?

God damn it, how much about my information do you guys have to ask?

...Actually, I think this one I can safely answer: No. I was not told whom Amished targeted specifically. He admitted targeting whom I think he did, so while I think I'm in the right to keep an eye on him, I want to focus on SaintKerrigan.

I'm listening.

I also fail to see why this info was incriminating, but meh.

UnFoS: StrangerCoug
FoS: RedCoyote

You've literally done nothing today but make trivial comments today (well, your latest one

might

possibly be an exception, but that's stretching things a lot), and you've only made three posts. There's a lot going on, here, and surely if you can find time to make those three trivial remarks, you can comment on other issues as well. You don't even have a suspect you're pushing for today.

By the way, I'd vote you, but I want to keep it on SPS for a while. Keep up this behavior, though, and I'm sure my vote will swing in your direction.

[RedCoyote]

Well, unfortunately no one sees it fit to answer my questions. I mean, SC just did, but you didn't even give me a chance to respond to that (how am I not surprised?).

If we know Amish visited someone last night, according to SC, then why shouldn't we take a chance on him? Going with the odds that not everyone here has a night action each night, and with the odds that the scumteam probably have more night actions than just a kill, I'd say we have a fair shot with our friend Amish here. I think he's been pretty reluctant to tell us exactly what went on. I can sort of understand this, but when you've been outted as a power role, then you may as well give us the goods. Amish might be hesitant because he's kind of feeling out the town's reactions rather than trying to be forthcoming.

Amish, you claim to have visited Nikanor, right? I mean, do you have any other information about your role or what you learned, do you think SC is leading the town astray, or do you have some other point of view?

[Amished]

Well, unfortunately no one sees it fit to answer my questions. I mean, SC just did, but you didn't even give me a chance to respond to that (how am I not surprised?).

If we know Amish visited someone last night, according to SC, then why shouldn't we take a chance on him? Going with the odds that not everyone here has a night action each night, and with the odds that the scumteam probably have more night actions than just a kill, I'd say we have a fair shot with our friend Amish here. I think he's been pretty reluctant to tell us exactly what went on. I can sort of understand this, but when you've been outted as a power role, then you may as well give us the goods. Amish might be hesitant because he's kind of feeling out the town's reactions rather than trying to be forthcoming.

Amish, you claim to have visited Nikanor, right? I mean, do you have any other information about your role or what you learned, do you think SC is leading the town astray, or do you have some other point of view?

COMPREHENSIVE READING FTW!

@SC: As I hinted in my first post of the day,

I made magnus_orion target Nikanor. (Obviously I'm a town redirector

; not a busdriver).

I've since asked Syke if I target somebody and they chose not to act (which I don't know why an SK wouldn't, but for complete clarification) would I force them to act.

I targeted mo cause there was just something off about his play; it seemed too aloof rather than getting into it; which made me feel he was scum. I didn't have much of a read on anybody that was super scummy, so I decided to make mo target Nik since he seemed to be a big question mark too and he had a decent chance of being scum.

*ADDENDUM*: if they don't act, I can't force them*

I was hoping that mo was either a roleblocker or sent to be the killer from the scum team; so that nik would be blocked/killed. Obviously mo is a killer, but nik didn't die. So I can confirm that MO must've been the scum kill (unless it was blocked on it's own) or nik has some sort of PGO + bulletproof role.

Yeah, I haven't explained anything about my role...

(extra bolding is mine)

[RedCoyote]

Okay, okay. I missed a post; no need to get snippy. You secretly know I'm town anyways.

So why is SC voting you then? Explain that one to me, Amish, from your point of view.