Okay. Right now, I'm trying to catch up in another game and don't have much time, so I'll save my suspicions, thoughts on what I missed, and reread of Percy/inHim for later. But first I'll come forward with the information everyone is waiting for.
Like Mighty Orbots said, we share a QT with night-talking together. We have not been confirmed to each other as town; however, I currently trust him.
Mighty Orbots warned about the no action Day-Night cycle on D3 long in advance. He also said on N1 that he would investigate Starbuck and Saint_Kerrigan, so it really was bad luck that both of them ended up dead by N2. He is also telling the truth about someone redirecting a kill toward inHimshallibe.
Everything dramonic has mentioned in the thread about limbo is what he told me. He did tell me I was his meatshield, and we were chatting in a QT all day. When I saw that I'd been placed in limbo, I thought it was because the scum wanted to shut me up...but no, apparently dramonic just suspected me. Our QT was called an interrogation room, and Kinetic's opening post said it was a place for [insert role name] to interrogate his captives (which implies I'm a suspect, although Kinetic might have been deliberately misleading). That said, I kind of have to do mental gymnastics to understand how the flavour of his role fits with his abilities.
He chose me because he wasn't sure I was town, but wasn't sure I was scum, either. When I pressed him afterward, dramonic pretty much admitted in our QT that he was just sheeping SpyreX because he trusted him due to SpyreX's redirection ability fitting with dramonic's immunity to it. (Thanks, SpyreX. <_<)
Finally, he released me because he
was fed up with all my walls of text in the QT
said I'd probably be more useful here. Before Zorblag's Plum suggestion, he'd wanted to take someone he said would be a good meatshield because of his lurking (not sure if I should reveal the target), although dramonic wasn't particularly suspicious of him.Not to bring back Sky flashbacks, but dramonic originally posted under a pseudonym. He revealed himself after I had fun guessing who he was (I guessed right, because I'm awesome
). However, Kinetic referred to dramonic by that same pseudonym. And later, dramonic said it was his real role name. In fact, he joked that he wouldn't give himself a pretentious title like that. I don't think dramonic is Sky.You know, maybe I'm suffering from Stockholm syndrome, but I'm actually leaning toward trusting dramonic. As with Mighty Orbots, his play in the thread has been consistent with his play in the QT. And judging by his spotty play, I don't think he could keep up the act that well if he were scum. Of course, he might have pretended to be town so that I could vouch for him when he released me into the thread. And I would also be a great limbo target for scum, because I was both active and a viable lynch. But I dunno. His suspicions and opinions aren't fleshed out, and I find he tends to parrot a bit, but he sounds genuine and consistent.
I was planning on revealing everything about limbo in the thread today without giving away the identity of the limboer unless he was in danger of a lynch. But everyone threatening to vig dramonic forced his hand (read: made me shout that if he didn't confess and I got vigged instead of him, I would throw a fit). It would tell scum how to work around the jailkeeping, but I'd rather eat a nightkill than a vig kill. The fact that dramonic confessed is a point in his favour, although I did mention in the QT that he might be lynched or vigged again if the kill on him failed.
If people have any questions, feel free to ask them.
Oh, yeah. One last thing.
I
was the one who noticed the inconsistency in ooba's suspect list. I was venting in the interrogation room QT over how no one else had picked up on it. Had I been in the game, I would have pressed ooba a lot harder on it. His weird theorizing gives him a few town points, but I still don't quite buy that he had a total change of heart on ALL his suspects. MO was defending me BEFORE ooba implied he still wanted to lynch me. As SpyreX would put it...cognitive dissonance.Iecerint, you said that you found dramonic's misrep of ooba scummy--to the point that you VOTED him primarily for pointing out the contradiction. Does it change your read on me to know that
I
was the one who thought it was a contradiction? Then, when I
dramonic pointed out quotes where ooba had clung to his suspects even after new events had occurred, you saw his point, but still left your vote on him. I've been wavering back and forth on you (I started suspecting you again at the beginning of Day Two, but thought you were more likely town by the end), but why the hell would you give a kneejerk defence of ooba before even rereading to see if dramonic's accusations were true? Regardless of ooba's alignment, that's fishy. Couldn't you have just waited for ooba to answer that himself?
