Iecerint wrote:@ Fate, I didn't out anyone. Blaze claimed when he didn't need to. I'm not going to apologize for bringing his bizarre QT behavior to light, because it WAS bizarre, and I went so far as to wait A WEEK to get feedback from QT mates who NEVER POSTED. Then the straw that broke the camels back was when he (this still makes no sense whatsoever) claimed that I "couldn't have a read on him" because he'd only posted a few times, when I said I had a NEUTRAL read on his slot and had flat-out asked him if he'd just claimed scum in QT when he pulled that bizarre move.
AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHWIQH$1@%#@!$#@!$%#@!%$#!#@R.
Because I hate Parama.
manho wrote:blazer should come and explain it clearly
Umm, how so, thats a full claim.
Tarhalindur wrote:Fate wrote:LOL FUCKING SWEET WE GET TO LYNCH GUARANTEED 3RD PARTY:
IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO CLAIM THAT WILL HELP TOWN NOWS YOUR CHANCE.
Uh, no.
However, there are two mitigating factors: 1)
I kinda need the Mafia Godfather dead and soon, and we can be pretty sure that Plum isn't it given reason
2) we have a claimed ability telling us how many scum are in the game (so we can lynch Plum at the correct time - I'd lynch her a day ahead of when we have to just to be safe) and that there is a Survivor in the game.
Especially not when we have a couple of really juicy targets lined up: you and Blaze.
Blaze: Yes, I know he's got a town investigation on him. However, given his behavior so far... I can't rule out Mafia Godfather. And that means I can't rule out a Blaze lynch.
Sane cop rules me as town, if you don't believe me, fine, but I think you should really go after confirmed scum (or people that have a good chance of being scum)
Mighty Orbots wrote:
@Fate, Papa Zito's voting is fine for me (it's at least as good as mine would be.) In the post of his you're referencing pretty clearly his intent was to suggest that the BlazezRb wagon was potentially to distract from something else. While he was doing that we were talking in the quick topic about whether or not to reveal our alignment cop result on him (clearly we decided yes.)
@Iecerint, at this point unless there's enough of a push to get all the gods to declare what worshiping them will do I probably don't think that you should. Mind you, I do think that there should be a move in that direction.
@BlazezRb, it doesn't sound like you're a roleblocker. If I'm reading what you've said correctly it sounds like you avoid redirects for yourself, your target and those adjacent to you in the vote count while you have your hammer. Or do you mean something else by cover action? Do you have any reason to think that your target will be protected or roleblocked beyond that (the roleblocked would be surprising at this point.) Do you know if the hammer recipient will allow those adjacent to them in the vote count to avoid redirects as well?
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
I'm guessing it works like this:
Player A roleblocks Player B
My cover action/hammer blocks the roleblock from activating, therefore, cop gets investigation results anyways.
sounds like a roleblocker, maybe redirector/busdriver