Tarhalindur wrote:Wow, I haven't seen such a good example of useless blather disguised as game analysis (Information Instead of Analysis) in a while.
Vote: Katy
Well, as I said in my post, I still wanted to go back and look at yesterday. I was just putting my thoughts in response to what had happened so far this day, because this game moves freaking fast.
In any case, now that I have been able to take a look at the end of the last day, which I missed due to my V/LA, I have a better handle on what I think about people.
For my worship, I voted
Egyptians
, but I did it just to see if it would show up in whatever ABR was doing for today. In order to help people who are trying to figure things out, my worship vote doesn't count. I'm not sure if there's any point in me voting or not at all from now on.
Anyways, as to people in the game:
The Scummy:
Snow_Bunny and DarkStalker are two that are confusing me, both have made blatantly anti-town actions but both have done them unambiguously and out way in the open, so I can't tell if they are town that isn't paying attention or scum that are making themselves as plain as day.
Snow_Bunny
claims a kill on someone everyone thought was anti-town, and
DarkStalker
suggests lynching a player of unknown alignment who cannot affect the game right now. I'm still feeling that Mina was town so this is not only a time-waster, but probably directly anti-town as well since I think it would lead to a town lynch of a person who can't defend herself against it.
because I think there's more chance Snow_bunny is actually being truthful.
Dramonic
was the very picture of active lurker yesterday, posting regularly, but posting little of substance. He was also fairly eager for the hammer to fall on Orto.
I also haven't changed my mind on
Nikanor
from yesterday. I disagree that the justification given for a vote does not indicate alignment. He made more than one vote whose justification indicated little to no thought put into his vote. I think town players are motivated to win and therefore motivated to find scum, not just vote for whoever has the most votes already, or other equally lazy reasons. I'm not saying every vote has to be accompanied by a dazzling case, or that you can't follow on the reasoning of others, but I tend to give town reads to people who put in some effort.
He also tried more than once to downplay ABR's plan, which now that it's actually played out into helpful info goes in the scum column.
The only thing that's holding me back is I am sure he and Parama wouldn't be scum together, and Parama's whole game consists of "Too much spam, I'm not playing" which is no more pro-town than anything I pointed out for Nik.
Towners:
ABR
: His power works and it seems to be a pretty pro-town power. I am buying what he is selling.
Tar/DTM
: This would be an outrageous gambit if they are lying and their claims match with ABR's census. I don't see how they could be other than what they claim.
Iecerint
: I still think he's town based on behavior and the info he's shared with everyone.
Orto
: As I said, I have info from the night that indicates he has to be a good guy. Unless anyone can think of a way that "benevolent spirit" could be bad. And because of that I'm also not interested in finding out why his lynch didn't work.
