Mini 983: It Got Worse (GAME OVER)

[LlamaFluff]

This line of thought is dumb and misleading. In-joke? Quit trying to lace posts with devenomizing words.

How is basing a (somewhat joking) vote on something that only Nik would know not an in-joke? I reacted to what looked like a baseless attack, and you responded as if I should have known of the event that I had no good way of knowing of.

Stop trying to fight Nik's non-existent battles, you aren't doing a very good job of it.
All it is doing is making you look worse.
And doesn't change my opinion of Nik.

Im not fighting his battles, or trying to change your opinion of Nik. I am trying to see what the basis of your vote right now is, since it appears to be soley based on things that there was no chance of me actually knowing.

Also again, how is V/LA (SK) the same thing as flaky (RF)?

[magnus_orion]

How often have you played with him?

Ongoing. Though LRC and LRC v 2 gave me some impressions, though I was merely backup modding for Kairyuu, so that wouldn't count as playing with him per se.

I generally find mod meta to be more reliable than playing meta. You've watched them the entire game, knowing their alignment, and how they interacted with others, as opposed to a player who only gets half the story until they flip.

oh I was supposed to watch the game?

Yes, I agree. Unfortunately, that more reliable bit is saying he's difficult to read

[sykedoc]

Fun Fact: RayFrost's last post was on Saturday. He has until the end of today to post before I prod him

[magnus_orion]

@sociopath:

I humbly demand that sociopath please make a response to my comment, preferably of an elucidating variety.

/\

[Amished]

I think that the mod is a pansy and should place a vote. Not voting is clearly anti-town. He's also active lurking.

Amished gains a point for being a pansy.

I had (and have) my vote on somebody, I'm not a pansy you pansy.

FoS: Sykedoc

(:shock: this is my first FoS EVER )

Socio's end of 117 is completely bogus. Because one person doesn't refute your shitty points doesn't mean that they aren't shitty.

@RC: There's just a lot of nuance-y things that bug the hell outta me about SP. Attacking Llama for something like that seems out of bounds for a townie, his response to magnus (admittedly happened after my post there) is the same way. I don't see how it's in the town's best interest for SP-town to be so outrageous when he's not always like this.

[SocioPath]

This line of thought is dumb and misleading. In-joke? Quit trying to lace posts with devenomizing words.

How is basing a (somewhat joking) vote on something that only Nik would know not an in-joke? I reacted to what looked like a baseless attack, and you responded as if I should have known of the event that I had no good way of knowing of.

Its not a joke.
Flakers are annoying.
Stop undermining my actions by saying everything I do is a joke.

@sociopath:

I humbly demand that sociopath please make a response to my comment, preferably of an elucidating variety.

/\

And for MO: I'm not going to respond to your silliness, when you call me out on my conclusions...and yet Nik doesn't.
Obviously they aren't completely invalid, or Nik would have been the first in line to clarify.

/\

Socio's end of 117 is completely bogus. Because one person doesn't refute your shitty points doesn't mean that they aren't shitty.

No its not.
That "one person" is the person whom made the original statement, try to keep up.
MO was talking about conclusions I got from Nik's post.
My conclusion was accurate in that Nik didn't refute it.


Seriously, this game is starting to feel like babysitting a bunch of crayon eatters.

[LlamaFluff]

This line of thought is dumb and misleading. In-joke? Quit trying to lace posts with devenomizing words.

How is basing a (somewhat joking) vote on something that only Nik would know not an in-joke? I reacted to what looked like a baseless attack, and you responded as if I should have known of the event that I had no good way of knowing of.

Its not a joke.
Flakers are annoying.
Stop undermining my actions by saying everything I do is a joke.

Ok fine, inside-information if you really insist upon it. What is not changing is that you were basing it on something that I did not, and could not have known, yet turning around and attacking me like I should have.

[Amished]

So.. other people can't comment on your shitty points? Just because Nik didn't refute it doesn't mean they didn't deserve to be refuted.

[SocioPath]

Ok fine, inside-information if you really insist upon it. What is not changing is that you were basing it on something that I did not, and could not have known, yet turning around and attacking me like I should have.

Nice misrep.
That is not what happened at all.

So.. other people can't comment on your shitty points? Just because Nik didn't refute it doesn't mean they didn't deserve to be refuted.

What the fuck are you even talking about.
You make fucking zero sense.
Stop talking.

[Amished]

Nik posted
You "made a conclusion" from nik's post
mo talked about your conclusions

Whether or not nik refuted jack shit means nothing. MO can still question you about your posts/conclusions. Why are you impossible?

Also, why aren't more people voting SP?

[SaintKerrigan]

Also, why aren't more people voting SP?

Because SP feels more anti-town to me than scummy atm.

[Amished]

So why is RedCoyote scummier than SP?

[SocioPath]

Why are you impossible?

Because it catches scum.

[SaintKerrigan]

So why is RedCoyote scummier than SP?

Because he piggybacked on SP's bad reasoning and added nothing original, which looks like lazy scum hiding behind someone else's case.

[Amished]

Not really. Everyone attacks incomprehensible actions. That's like saying voting everyone on the player list at some point will make you vote scum. It's technically true but the result is worse than sticking a fork into an electrical socket.

[SocioPath]

My results are far more accurate and likely than getting shocked by sticking a fork in a light socket.

[SaintKerrigan]

Getting shocked by sticking a fork in a light socket is far more accurate and likely than my results are.

Fixed for accuracy.

[Amished]

No, because I believe you're more likely to stick a fork in a light socket than to find scum.

[SocioPath]

No, because I believe you're more likely to stick a fork in a light socket than to find scum.

I found YOU in LRC v1.

But I don't need to start spouting off my credentials.
Its annoying in that every game I'm in I have to go 'YES I DO WHAT I DO WELL. HERE IS PROOF. LINK LINK LINK LINK"

Go meta me, or shut up.

[Amished]

You found Ray, not me. Besides, fuckall @ meta.

[SocioPath]

You found Ray, not me.

This is a blatant lie.

Besides, fuckall @ meta.

Don't say this directly after saying this:

No, because I believe you're more likely to stick a fork in a light socket than to find scum.

But you did convince me for now.

Unvote
Vote: Amished

[Amished]

Yep, more likely to find a fork in a light socket than scum. That was based on this game, not any meta.

[LlamaFluff]

Ok fine, inside-information if you really insist upon it. What is not changing is that you were basing it on something that I did not, and could not have known, yet turning around and attacking me like I should have.

Nice misrep.
That is not what happened at all.

So what part of it is wrong? You keep saying "your wrong" and then refuse to explain anything clearly. I shouldnt have to spend four pages of the game guessing what convoluted reason you are voting me for.

[SocioPath]

Yep, more likely to find a fork in a light socket than scum. That was based on this game, not any meta.

Shut up Ed, your hypocrisy is showing.

I shouldnt have to spend four pages of the game guessing what convoluted reason you are voting me for.

Stop acting like its a requirement that should know such in the first place.

[Amished]

I don't possess hypocrisy. It's a technological invention, and I have 0 technology.