Well. I've got some time online in town apparently. Let's see if the site wants to not lag long enough for me to finish this post.
----------------
On Reap's posts:
-If you are town, I agree that a scum or two is likely on your wagon.
-Your point on UK mod-voting is null. She does it in every game she plays.
-About RVS, I STRONGLY dislike a stage where everyone is doing nothing but joking and basically ignoring anything serious in the game.
--------HOWEVER, it is a game and should be fun, so jokes throughout the entire game are perfectly fine as long as it doesn't distract from the game.
-
Reap wrote:which is why I didn't complain about a lack of content in my only notable post thus far, i was just trying to get MYSELF out of RVS and begin to scumhunt a bit before my weekend vaca... looks like that backfired on me once I did the omgus (literally) vote. but then, people will always misread.
This..actually.. looks genuine. As long as you continue to contribute, I can believe this.
-
Reap wrote:also, this post has good points about MMM, NS, and mb, but overall I'd say this post bears a striking similarity to my own 121, which kmd disparages in his post. yes, my post WAS an attempt at content. whether it was 'lame' or not is a matter of opinion.
No. The other one basically looked like content for the sake of content to appear townier. I like these posts better.
-See, the bottom of 190 is exactly what I was talking about. I had actual points on you with some jokes mixed in. You choose to respond to the jokes rather than the points.
-----------------
So, overall on Reap, as much as I hate this, my read is...
*Shrug*.
I still feel like some of my points apply, but he kind of seems more like a jokey player than doing anything that makes more sense as scum than town. I also feel uneasy about the way people jumped right on to the wagon.
I think I'm going to have to
Unvote
(Retracted, see below) and admit I may have been wrong.
---------------
Farside, are you really suggesting that UK replaced out
strategically
? Because I don't see that at all.
---------------
Reap wrote:So far, the only 'scumtell' that you seem to be concentrating on is lack of content. This strikes me as odd, because it doesn't seem that you've made a sincere effort to hunt any scum, you just want to crucify people for not posting much. Which in my experience is exactly what scum do, to throw suspicion elsewhere and make themselves look better in the public eye.
Gah!
Isn't this EXACTLY what you are doing?
I'm retracting that unvote.
Crap. Guys, we have a problem. Reap and Mac are both pretty scummy, but I don't think they are scum together because their spat looks genuine.
So either:
A.) I'm misreading one of them
B.) I'm misreading both and it's town vs town
C.) We have two scum groups or an SK.
I think I'm ok with a lynch of either of the two. If it's a misread, I think I lean Mac as a lynch because Reap has me tearing my hair out trying to determine his alignment.
Ok, yeah.
Unvote, Vote MacavityLock
------------------
Fake wrote:@MLock: if you were indeed miller, why would you mention your claim more than once? Even asking people to comment on it?
Because he's scum playing the ol' miller Gambit.
-------------------
Esp wrote:Why would you claim miller straight off and not wait to see if you even get investigated. In all honesty the main incentives I can see for that is that you are non godfather scum trying to get yourself cleared if you get investigated or a third party role that doesn't want the scum to kill you because you can easily be set up.
If he's honestly a miller, the idea is that by claiming Day 1, he isn't wasting a cop's investigation or bringing up a distraction later. It's still debatable whether or not that is the best strategy, but it has become common.
--------------
Crap, gotta go.
Note to self: Read 209 next.
