With 7 alive, it took 4 to lynch.
(4) TheSkeward: Ooba, SpyreX, Zang, cruelty
(1) Darox: TheSkeward
(2) Not Voting: MagnaofIllusion, Darox
TheSkeward,
Ooba wrote: Gut tells me its spyrex - not voting. Magna think you should unvote in the off chance it is Zang.
So your premise is that the set-up is Town RB + Town Cop + Town Vigs + Town Spiritualist versus Goon + Goon + Traitor Doctor? That’s ludicrous.Darox wrote:Spyrex was innocent as told by our town confirmed cop.
If magna and zang were both telling the truth Spyrex should be dead.
Then why didn’t you bother to make a case against Ooba?Darox wrote:Really Ooba should have been lynched and Spyrex be the deciding vig, but whatever.
Voting for the player I am most confident is scum (Sprexy) right out of the box isn’t absurd. I know I’m Town. The only way a quicklynch happens is under the following two scenarios –Darox wrote:I would be surprised if the remaining scum were 2 goons, but to leap to the conclusion you have and vote right out of the gates in LYLO is absurd.
Confirm that you are Mafia of course.Spyrex wrote:The quickvote and ooba's little dance confirm it.
One more thing: Zang, did you get an action successful message?
I bet you did, since I did.
Ohh, you mean the same one you were espousing at the end of the day? Funny how you forgot that.What happened to your grand theory that TS and I were scum-buddies?
It was successful. And the fact you said Zang specifically means Zang's was too.And please post your successful action message from EB so Zang can comment on it.
Sprexy you make me laugh. I’m now as certain as ever that you are scum. Because the only messages I have ever received from EB are to say that he has received my action. Because as a Weak Vig it is APPARENT IN THE PLOT whether I succeeded or not. But not really being a Weak Vig you didn’t know that, did you.Spyrex wrote:It was successful. And the fact you said Zang specifically means Zang's was too.
Which, normally, wouldn't matter but we have proof that an unsuccessful message is given if the result is not successful.
Which, thus, means that if you were telling the truth about being roleblocked you wouldn't have segued into supposition - but, instead, directly said you were roleblocked.
That didn't happen. Why is that?
Dingle dangle.
EB for Night 1 wrote:Okies, gotchaMoI wrote:Tonight I will be coming after CryMeARiver for my Angry Mob action.
EB for Night 2 wrote:Thanks for letting me know your action!MoI wrote:Angry Mob on Nobody Special.
Moi Night 3 wrote:For my Angry Mob action Night 3 I will of course attack Spyrex.
As for the whole bet re: Avatars issue I'll take this opprotunity to apologize directly. I've seen those sorts of bets made in several other games here and didn't realize that it would be offensive to you.
Magna
Way to gambit yourself into confirmation that you aren’t a Weak Vig. Which Zang will be able to confirm.EB for Night 3 wrote: Gotcha; and no worries about the bet thing, I just don't want to see a pattern of outside influences that could break the game
You are right about only saying that he has received the action IF IT IS SUCCESSFUL. (Hence, I know mine was because I didn't get the above).ElecrticBadger wrote:Your attempt fails.TheSkeward wrote:I target Nobody Special.
I asked you to post yours so Zang could see you were full of shit. Note that you haven’t posted your “action successful” message as requested, even after I posted all three of mine. Note that none of mine say Action Successful or Action Failed. But I’ll happily wait for Zang to come and vote for you. But while we are waiting post your messages from EB for all three Nights. I dare you. You haven’t because you know you aren’t allowed to post fake material from the GM. I already posted my correspondence and if I had fabricated them I’m sure I would have been modkilled for faking information from the GM. But I didn't need to fake them because I'm telling the truth.Spyrex wrote:You are right about only saying that he has received the action IF IT IS SUCCESSFUL. (Hence, I know mine was because I didn't get the above).
However, you opted to come in and go "ohh snap someone was roleblocked" but then ask specifically for me to compare my successful message with Zangs.
Because, gasp, when I didn't get killed you had to claim something right. And you knew Zang was going to be successful. You just didn't remember the fact that unsuccessful actions are responded to by the mod.
Spyrex wrote:What a surprise, a swing and a miss.
Pro-tip : All caps makes you look like caught scum. Also I not you don’t attempt to actually say that I’m scummy for speculating about the set-up. You just now start because it otherwise points out that you, of course, as scum already know.Spyrex wrote: Not to mention that now your claiming the setup is Godfather, Roleblocker, Doctor for scum. Which is just awesomeo.
Tinfoil theory: Manga is the godfather. That would explain the adamancy in OHH SNAP GODFATHERS MUST BE THERE EVEN THOUGH THAT MEANS OUR COP HIT THE FALSE POSITIVE AND THE FALSE NEGATIVE BACK TO BACK!
ElectricBadger wrote:Confirmed. Thanks!SpyreX wrote:BOOM. Vig: Manga
ElectricBadger wrote:Action confirmed.SpyreX wrote:Vig: NS
ElectricBadger wrote:Confirmed!SpyreX wrote:Hells bells. It BETTER not be Zang. Vig: Manga
ElectricBadger wrote:Confirmed, thank you!Zang wrote:I will try to kill Darox.
(He didn't quote my second one)ElectricBadger wrote:Okies
ElectricBadger wrote:Alrighty, thanks for getting your action to me so fast!Zang wrote:I will try to kill SpyreX.
I didn't read that In the rules but if your right and SpyreX is the godfather, than couldn't he post the messages from the mod he got from sending in a mafia kill, except changing the quote. Or would that be considered faking a message.Magna wrote:You haven’t because you know you aren’t allowed to post fake material from the GM. I already posted my correspondence and if I had fabricated them I’m sure I would have been modkilled for faking information from the GM. But I didn't need to fake them because I'm telling the truth.
I'd rather not yet, I believe it is lylo and I want to be careful with my vote.Magna wrote:Hammer away Zang and Ooba
If I was faking it I would have posted incorrect messages from EB then, wouldn't I? Oh wait, you said it isn't a rule because you weren't killed. Thanks for confirming your posts were doctoredSprex wrote:Look at what I quoted about TheSkeward. Unsuccessful actions are told so by the mod. Manga came in insinuating he was roleblocked but, as we can see, thats not the case.