Mini 975 - Dirty Dirty South Mafia - game over

[TheButtonmen]

The case on you has been made multiple times and you continue to change your story everytime you post; complaining people aren't explaing why they are voting you is absurd.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

They're not "unforgivable" Eldar. And they are not mistakes They're something someone found cute to take to cause, and found out they bit more then they can chew.

And my noose is far from unavoidable if you actually open your eyes

Catch scum, not some

you

think is horrible town.

That is one of the greatest mistakes any one can make of me in this game.~

[Midnight's Sorrow]

*sigh*

God. Pray that you hold me back from coming through the internet and strangling some people.



I thought you, button, at least, we one of the saner ones in this thread. I guess I was wrong?

And I am not asking why people are voting

me

. I am asking you all why you have felt the need this whole game to change votes and leave it at that, no explanation unless some one asks them. No one should HAVE to ask, is what I am getting at. You you are dodging the question still. Its a simple question that should only have a simple answer, yet it continues to be ignored. This will not do. Not do at all.

And no I have not changed my story I will

not

be repeating this after this post. I'm done with that accuasation. Move on to better ones please. kthksbai~

[Kenman]

[quote"MS"]
God. Pray that you hold me back from coming through the internet and strangling some people.
[/quote]

LOLOLOLOLOL

[Incognito]

Kenman (1) <-~ Earlder1
*Midnight's Sorrow (6) <-~ SaintKerrigan, Hoopla, SerialClergyman, Steam-Powered Shovel, camn, Kenman
camn (1) <-~ Midnight's Sorrow
Steam-Powered Shovel (1) <-~ Ellibereth
Earlder1 (1) <-~ TheButtonmen

Not voting (2) <-~ bouncy.bouncy, Maemuki

12 alive; 7 votes will do it.

An asterisk by a player's name indicates said player would be lynched if deadline were to hit right this moment.

Morning Deadline:

Wednesday, May 19th at 8:30 P.M. EST

Day Deadline:

Friday, May 21st at 8:30 P.M. EST

---

About 4 more hours until Morning's deadline.

[Midnight's Sorrow]

So. Am I going t get killed in 4 hours if it stays the same? Or is it the day deadline that matters?

[Incognito]

So. Am I going t get killed in 4 hours if it stays the same? Or is it the day deadline that matters?

Day deadline is what counts for lynches.

[TheButtonmen]

Relevant

[Steam-Powered Shovel]

The Morning deadline is only relevant for role actions, not lynchings.

bouncy.bouncy, please hammer Midnight's Sorrow. It would be mucho appreciated.

[TheButtonmen]

Why bouncy.bouncy in particular?

[Midnight's Sorrow]

So then. There is hope for me I guess?

...somehow I dobt that >.>

My thoughts are. That either camn or mae are scum. Or they both are. There is no way they are both town. Not by a long shot folks

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Hmm...lets say theres 2-3 scum in this.

I would rate them atm as

Camn and/or Mae

SPS

Third one either being camn and/or mae on the

very

much likely hood that they are both scum, or Eliberth.~

[SaintKerrigan]

MS, didn't I tell you that abusing the rolling eyes smiley was a scumtell? Tsk, tsk.

Why should we believe you're town? You haven't been very convincing in that department...

[Midnight's Sorrow]

And neither have other people. Why the tunnel vision where I am concerned? Should you not be also looking else where for people who are scum???

[Midnight's Sorrow]

Why bouncy.bouncy in particular?

So he can be easy to lynch next day. Why else?

[SaintKerrigan]

And neither have other people. Why the tunnel vision where I am concerned? Should you not be also looking else where for people who are scum???

You aren't presenting convincing evidence why other people aren't town.

Nobody's been tunneling on you, by the way. You just stole most of the show.

@ Buttonmen: Why were you voting for Hoopla earlier?

[Midnight's Sorrow]

And again. Neither is anyone else??

Also if it isn't tunneling it sure as hell feels like it

[TheButtonmen]

'cause she got a scum PM.

Also her ISO 4-7 made me go hmmm.

[Steam-Powered Shovel]

Why bouncy.bouncy in particular?

I could tell you, but

then I'd have to kill you

that might defeat the point of asking the question depending on my motivations (or possible lack thereof).

ISO 4-7 of Hoopla strikes me as innocent jokewagonning. Was anyone seriously thinking about lynching bouncy.bouncy?

[Ellibereth]

Still like my vote. Let's string him up.

I see no problem with Ellibereth. (I totally knew she'd end up voting for me sooner or later too. Eerily DGBish.)

Saywhat? Does DGB always vote you?
Assuming Midnight-town I would assume something like 1-2 scum on him right now soooo yeah. And even if he was scum there's probably 1-2 bussing.

[Incognito]

I received a question via PM about potential role actions and what would happen to them if a lynch happened before the Morning's deadline, so I'll just answer here so that everyone's aware:

If the action

is

submitted during the Morning phase before the lynch actually does occur, then the action will be counted and it will just resolve after the lynch has happened. The lynch would technically end the Morning and as per the rules, all actions submitted during the Morning resolve at the end of the Morning phase.

If the action is NOT submitted during the Morning phase before the lynch actually does occur, then the action WON'T be counted since it didn't get sent in before the Morning phase ended.

I hope that helps.

[Incognito]

Morning 1 is now ovah! Afternoon 1 begins now.

bouncy.bouncy has been prodded.

[Earlder1]

@MS

Well, I know you're done responding to this accusation but..

YOU DID CHANGE YOUR STORY!

I am in 100% agreement with Kenman and Camn on that point. You said one thing. Then you said another. That is far from consistent. You can claim that you maybe didn't tell the entire story the first time, even though it can be easily inferred that you hadn't seen the vote count because YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T READ THE THREAD. Regardless, this inconsistency strikes me as quite scummy.

You complain about voting without cause so here it goes.

For more reasons...

EBWOP:

First fail of this game >.>;;

vote:bouncy.bouncy

....jeez >.>#

After claiming to not have read the thread, you noticed your unbolded vote and changed it. If anything, this is minute but it does show you had to have read the thread.

camn wrote:
bouncy.bouncy wrote:
...until that's resolved.

(hit the submit button too early)


Why don't we just lynch you, since you are scum.
That will resolve things nicely.


Why don't we vote you? Cause you clearly cant make more then two sentences. Or can you?

unvote

vote:camn~

You spelled "than" wrong, an obvious scumtell. No but seriously, you cast your first non-"random" vote with a pretty flimsy reason.

Me thinks your on to something Ellibereth.~

Bravo. This is a most precious day in the history of these hollowed three pages~

Let's test then shall we~

Unvote

Vote:bouncy.bouncy

Here, you bandwagon, this time non "randomly". Scum often jump the lynch train without providing their own thoughts or analysis to back up why they are suspicious of a player. You have said this repeatedly, yet you do the same thing here. You have spent so much time complaining about other people voting you for unoriginal reasons, but you do the same. Inconsistent much?

Ellibereth says me and bouncy are scum buddies.

She wants a bouncy lynch. If it comes out scum, then I must be scum as well.~

If bouncy came up town, this would catch her in a lie.

You know???

Wow. If this doesn't imply that you know who the scum are, then I don't know what does. You almost use bouncy's innocence as a way to clear yourself, if we were to lynch him. This post screams that you are scum and bouncy is not. You were just trying to find a reason to not be suspected if bouncy flipped town, and he was carrying the most votes at that point in the game. Scum play.

My thoughts are, that camn is full of sheet.~ The whole bouncy bandwagon was started because of a decent question he asked in response to these posts.

SaintKerrigan wrote:
Meanwhile, Vote: Ellibereth.
Policy lynch. We've never been on the same side.


SaintKerrigan wrote:
camn wrote:
@SK- I am not ready for an Eli lynch, policy be damned.
but Elli has never been on the same side as me, and I'm town in this game. What more could you possibly need?


bouncy.bouncy wrote:
SaintKerrigan wrote:
Meanwhile, Vote: Ellibereth.Policy lynch. We've never been on the same side.
This makes no sense unless he's always scum


camn wrote:
Well, not precisely.

Logically, if it WERE true, SK could be scum sometimes, whilst Elli were town.


SaintKerrigan wrote:
Camn is correct in the interpretation of my logic.

Well, not precisely.

Logically, if it WERE true, SK could be scum sometimes, whilst Elli were town.Quote:
Could you explain better?

Out of the fracking blue he is voted on. lolwut?? He asked a pretty decent question if I say so myself. Even I'm lost with how "logical" that was. If SK said he voted eli for never being on the same sides as him, then that means that if Sk is scum, eli is town. Vice Versa.

Bouncy asked a simple question of elaboration, and all he got was veiled internet meme. This is sad. And the reason why I voted camn in the first place after I read the thread after placing my RV.

Bouncy is not weak in the logic department

His simple question was landslided with votes up the wazoo, by people who seem to not be able to give an eloquently simple answer to a simple question when presented to them, without the use of faceplams and undercurrents of internet meme on the horizon

Which is why I'll change my vote back to camn.

unvote

Vote:camn

I see this as very inconsistent. You first acknowledge that Elli may be correct with suspecting bouncy, who you proceeded to vote without reason. Suddenly, you jump to his defense. You were apparently suspicious of bouncy also but when Camn says so, she's "full of sheet"? INCONSISTENT.

After all of this, the big debate about your "random" vote starts and that is pretty much icing on the cake. I firmly believe you are scum, and once this is confirmed, I no longer see Bouncy as his partner. This may have to be re-evaluated but at the moment, I don't see them as the scum team.

If you do flip town, then an analysis of your bandwagon would still benefit your allignment so you wouldn't have died in vain. If you flip scum, good .

Vote: Midnight's Sorrow

P.S. I previewed this post and there are some formatting issues with one quote. This is MS's 10th post so refer to that if my post gets confusing.

[Incognito]

*Midnight's Sorrow (7) <-~ SaintKerrigan, Hoopla, SerialClergyman, Steam-Powered Shovel, camn, Kenman, Earlder1

camn (1) <-~ Midnight's Sorrow
Steam-Powered Shovel (1) <-~ Ellibereth
Earlder1 (1) <-~ TheButtonmen

Not voting (2) <-~ bouncy.bouncy, Maemuki

12 alive; 7 votes will do it.

An asterisk by a player's name indicates said player would be lynched if deadline were to hit right this moment.

Morning Deadline:

Wednesday, May 19th at 8:30 P.M. EST

Day Deadline:

Friday, May 21st at 8:30 P.M. EST

---

Midnight's Sorrow,

Townie

, lynched Day 1

It is now Day 2, Morning. I will put up deadline information shortly.

[Midnight's Sorrow]