FakeGod wrote:Fugi, sorry but I tend not to trust people who pretends lying is part of their grand strategy, and you are not helping town any by keeping this "2-part strategy" to yourself. So until you explain how your lying will help the town find scum, I'm going to include "Fugi lies" in all my posts. And I feel justified in doing so, because I was the victim in this case.
Okay, going to say that the man has a point here since I do not approve of whatever the hell Fugi is doing right now. Seriously, explain why you seem to be screwing around, Fugi. I don't get it, I don't think anyone does, and you've openly admitted to doing scummy things with no real explanation except "I have a strategy."
Espeonage wrote:btw I am liking Fugitive as town.
If you're going to appeal to someone, appeal to the people attacking you, not the one defending you. That just screams "buddying."
The Fugitive/FakeGod life gamble is the most retarded thing I have ever seen.
THE MOST RETARDED THING I HAVE EVER SEEN.
Fugitive wrote:Now, second order of business. Esp is clearly my second candidate for scum now. I think he's scum, possibly even more likely than FG. BUT, we stand to gain less from his lynch, so I'd still like an FG lynch today.
I hate this. Lynch the most likely scum regardless of the information it will give you. If you're more likely to hit scum with lynch A than lynch B, then obviously lynch A is a better lynch.
Fugitive wrote:No, it's not meaningless because Esp will probably be lynched today, leaving, likely both of us, tomorrow. And my way is much more town friendly.
Note this for later people because this is going to come back to haunt Fugi, I promise.
InflatablePie wrote:Espeonage wrote:No i don't think Zang is scum.
Okay. Would you support a Zang lynch, then?
Saying you think someone isn't scum implies you don't want to lynch them. Why are you asking such a pointless question?
Fugitive wrote:InflatablePie wrote:It's one of Mastin's Insane Tells (wiki it) and I've found it to be generally true.
You realize they're called "insane" tells because most people regard them as worthless. Like me. Espeonage could be scum, but I wouldn't vote for him, yet, based off of what I've seen no matter what Mastin says.
Argument from experience here but yes people who answer questions directed at other people are more likely scum because they're acting with more authority than the town would and are responding with their opinion for another person who might have a different opinion.
InflatablePie wrote:Shh, Fugi. It's bad enough I had to bring up the tell - don't ruin my plan.
Why does everyone seem to have some sort of evil plot?
DocPotter wrote:lol Espeonage.
FG is starting to show obv town, along with Fugi, so perhaps you should try casting your mis-information wider.
Then where are the scum?
Fugitive wrote:InflatablePie wrote:There's a Penis of Suspicion.
I forgot about this one. Oh, Scoreheroers.
Inb4ObligatoryParamaPainOfSalvationJoke
*Obligatory Parama Pain of Salvation Joke*
OH MY GOD BROOMHEAD IS SCUM.
SERIOUSLY LOOK AT THE TIMING OF HIS ARGUMENTS.
broomhead wrote:So what does that mean? We can lynch him now (probs not the best idea - in case he is doc) or wait to see if he is killed in the night. If he is, then he was the doc, if not: scum. There is a big flaw with that plan though, say he is doc. Then scum won't kill him over the night and we'll waste our day 2 lynch on an innocent. I see no way to see if he is telling the truth or not besides my gut.
broomhead wrote:unvote
Vote: Espeonage
The problems with your initial idea:
1. Lynching a claimed doc is never a good idea, because - like you said - if he IS really a doc then scum will kill him.
2. You set up a nice Espeonage framing here - you're basically saying "If he's alive tomorrow we lynch him." Ever think the scum might intentionally leave him alive for this reason? Not a very townie thing to say.
And the worst part is that you say we shouldn't lynch him and then you go and vote for him two posts later. /contradict self much?
broomhead wrote:So what does that make me think?
It makes me think that Fugi is the scum and FG is the town. That does not exonerate FG from making a stupid 'life gamble', but whatever.
So what do you think Fugi jumping onto Espe was? Scum bussing their buddy when a potential ML could happen just as easily? You seem to be forgetting you have a scum read on Fugi as well as the person he's voting.
broomhead wrote:Well there is a thought. I am am not going to vote for Fugi right now (as I planned) because i have a better idea. But the idea requires more quotes.
I'm starting to think that everyone but me is plotting something sinister.
I don't get the point of your post following that quote. Are you implying that if we lynch Espe and he flips scum then Fugi would be a good lynch as well? Lining up lynches much?
By the way, blatant defending of someone =/= scum defending scum. In fact, that's rarely the case. If it gives them more town cred then scum will bus their buddies to death if it looks like the lynch is inevitable anyways.
Broomhead's continued push on a claimed PR reeks of scumminess, especially the major logical fails involved.
broomhead wrote:yeah, I think he's lying. and if he is not he'll be killed in the night anyways. And if he is not killed in the night then we are forced to kill him day 2 because why wouldn't the freakin scum kill him? Because he is scum.
Yay there's that framing job again. If you want this to happen the why the hell are you voting Espe instead?
Zang wrote:Parama wrote:Zang are you going to ever do anything substantial? All you're doing is commenting on other people's posts without providing anything original and you're not really doing any scumhunting. At all.
Why must there be so many scummy people in this game? My Espe vote isn't moving until he responds, maybe not even then if his responses suck. But srsly... FG, Espe, Zang, all need to die.
I believe that I am, I'm not just commenting, I'm responding to questions or accusations at me and I'm asking questions myself. I am scumhunting. And at least I'm contributing, people like docpotter or fate get away with posting little content and I'm the one being criticized for not scumhunting.
Okay, I'm going to use the remainder of your post to point out why you're wrong.
Zang wrote:Fate wrote:Fugitive please bus Espeon now.
Zang an espeon vote would go a long way with your content problem.
I don't know what "content problem" your talking about but I am thinking about voting esp.
Content problem = active lurking
Why are you thinking about voting Espe? You say you want to (after a claim) and then you don't act upon it. And there's absolutely no reason.
Zang wrote:DocPotter wrote:Zang, yes I suppose it is.
I learned recently that I don't make good arguements/cases, that my most effective way of playing is to wait for the scum to out one of their number and then track the others down that way.
Which is what I plan to do.
I recently have also learned something like that but you should still try.
^pointless filler^
Zang wrote:InflatablePie wrote:You say you don't want a Zang lynch and you tell us what Fate was thinking, rather than letting Fate answer the question.
So you're hinting that you think Zang is scum, but at the same time saying you don't want him lynched. I don't like that. It looks like you're trying to be on both sides here, so you can back up either side later on.
I don't mind your vote on DP, but it's not making you look better. ]
I think you overreacting. All esp was doing was explaining why he agreed with fate. I don't know how you can get that he thinks I'm scum from that.
Have you seen him say I was scum anywhere?
Here we have Zang defending Espe and giving Espe's reasons for him. That doesn't look anything like buddying, does it?
Zang wrote:FakeGod wrote:Off-Topic Question: is there a Arm of Suspicion? or maybe Half-My-Body of Suspicion?
No, I think the highest suspicoun is the hand but I have seen a KOS or knuckle of suspicoun which is slightly less than a FOS.
^pointless filler^
Zang wrote:InflatablePie wrote:InflatablePie wrote:You HAVE voted for Zang. Your first post:
Espeonage wrote:OMGUS
Vote: Zang
Other than the posts I brought up in my arguments against you (policy lynching, Zang being a good scum), I don't think you've mentioned Zang much.
Calm down, Esp. Maybe hum a little bit of "I Feel Pretty"?
That vote was in RVS, it shouldn't count toward if esp has voted for me.
More defending Espe, trying to justify HIS votes. Um... buddy more why don't you?
Zang wrote:espionage wrote:Doc peeps.
I'm not really sure if i believe this yet.
Oh really? See: later on in this post.
Zang wrote:broomhead wrote:I seriously doubt we have 2 docs in one game so there is no way to save him if he is doc.
Are you claiming doctor? as far as I know he is the only person who's claimed doctor unless I'm missing somebody. If your not claiming, how do you know we have two doctors?
ROLEFISHING ZOMG
Zang wrote:Brandi wrote:Eh, because I'm dumb and just didn't think of it. Even still that definition alone would not have helped me much as Parama explained it better.
Thank you for responding to my questions, and also
Unvote
Did you really have a reason to hold a Brandi vote for that long? What about Brandi's responses made you see her as townier?
Zang wrote:I'm going to hold off on voting espionage for now because of his claim.
So you believe his claim... but earlier you said you didn't believe it. Contradiction.
Notice how the majority of your post here does not even attempt to find scum - it's more defending and doing generally scummy things. There's no logic, there's nothing even worth posting - yet you say you're scumhunting? You're either stupid town or scum. Maybe even stupid scum.
Whoops, back to the Fugi thing I mentioned earlier.
Fugitive wrote:No, it's not meaningless because Esp will probably be lynched today, leaving, likely both of us, tomorrow. And my way is much more town friendly.
Fugitive wrote:Unvote
Vote: Espeonage
I've been convinced.
Your first quote was from BEFORE you were even voting Espe? Really Fugi? I thought you were better than that. You're saying "Well Espe is going to be lynched" even though you oppose the lynch, and then later you jump on this same wagon.
Um, hello?
Fugitive wrote:That's L-2, on FG, Parama. Unless I grossly miscounted, but I triple checked.
Unvote
Vote: FakeGod
This is L-1.
Fugitive wrote:Esp will probably be lynched today, leaving, likely both of us, tomorrow
WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
Seriously, screw this game.
Parama-certified scumlist:
Broomhead
Zang
FakeGod
Fugitive
Espeonage
If all the scum aren't on this list then I fail at mafia forever. The fact that this list is so big is frustrating me. This is my preferred lynch order for now. It was actually rather hard to order - Broomhead is top because of the repeated contradictions pointed out here along with a lack of activity during the heated parts of the Espe wagon. Zang is there because I have no reason to see him as town, and he's either lying about his posts or just doesn't get it; more likely the former. FakeGod is still scum because he still hasn't done much to help the town. Fugitive has done some ridiculous stuff and has massive contradictions in his voting record. Espeonage isn't on the bottom of this list just because of the claim - my vote was more pressure before and though he hasn't done much to change my mind everyone else above him has proved to be scummier.
unvote, vote: Broomhead
This is a really frustrating game and I don't like having to post huge walls like this just to say everything that needs to be said. This took an hour and I'm all but 100% sure that the entire scumteam is on my list.
Extra notes:
Broomhead is not scum with Espe (unless he's pulling an extreme bus technique that makes no sense at this point)
Fugi is not scum with FakeGod - obvious
Fugi is probably not scum with Espe, though this may be an opinion based on my crazy theories.
Zang is probably not scum with broomhead (rolefishing attempt; this is one of my least favorite things to have to do because these are my top two scum reads
)
Man, I'm exhausted.