Gut tells me so. So far whenever I have ignored my gut It has ended badly. Need to try a new approach.
Oh and seeing as my vote is nowhere.
233:Espeonage wrote:I never said who i was speaking for I just stated the reason I saw. I did say that I agreed with Fate on that point and i ended up providing my explaination.
You agree that he is acceptable D1 lynch material.Espeonage wrote:From my small experience with Zang. I agree.Fate wrote:Zang is ALWAYS acceptable D1 lynch material. Doesn't make him any more likely scum though...
Anti asks Fate a question.Antiximo wrote:Yo fate, get your ass here and tell me why zang is usually a good lynch d1.
You answer it, for Fate.Espeonage wrote:Because Zang is a very good scum.
You say you don't want a Zang lynch and you tell us what Fate was thinking, rather than letting Fate answer the question.Espeonage wrote:I never said I was advocating a Zang lynch. I was merely giving an explaination to Anti. That is Fate's ideal. Not mine.
You're making my head hurt trying to explain things.Espeonage wrote:No i am not hinting that Zang is scum i was making comment o n Meta.
And yes I provided my reasoning. Mine. Do you see Fate's name onm that post? No you see mine. He wanted an explaination so I gave mine. I didn't say i was providing the answer Fate was going to give. I gave the answer I thought for the interim. I didn't expect fate to end up not even answering in the end.
He said one thing and is now trying to change what he said or meant. If you look in the context this situation was in, it appeared very much like Espeon was speaking for Fate. Also this.Fugitive wrote:Pie. Why is Espeon's inconsistency over the Fate/Zang thing ground for a lynch, in your eyes? Even if he were to admit his inconsistency.
I've generally found that people speaking for others tends to be an action taken by scum. It's similar to heavily defending another player or something of the sort.Fugitive wrote:No no, Pie. Okay, why does the fact that Espeon speaking for fate mean that he's scum? The thing you linked is Fate saying basically what you said. I can pose this to him too. Why does it make him scum to contradict himself?
Okay. Would you support a Zang lynch, then?Espeonage wrote:No i don't think Zang is scum.
You realize they're called "insane" tells because most people regard them as worthless. Like me. Espeonage could be scum, but I wouldn't vote for him, yet, based off of what I've seen no matter what Mastin says.InflatablePie wrote:Fugitive wrote: It's one of Mastin's Insane Tells (wiki it) and I've found it to be generally true.
You realize they're called "insane" tells because most people regard them as worthless. Like me. Espeonage could be scum, but I wouldn't vote for him, yet, based off of what I've seen no matter what Mastin says.InflatablePie wrote:It's one of Mastin's Insane Tells (wiki it) and I've found it to be generally true.
I know. It says it at the top of the article.Fugitive wrote:You realize they're called "insane" tells because most people regard them as worthless.InflatablePie wrote:It's one of Mastin's Insane Tells (wiki it) and I've found it to be generally true.
So, you've changed your mind on the policy lynch idea you posed earlier?Espeonage wrote:Currently, No.InflatablePie wrote:Okay. Would you support a Zang lynch, then?Espeonage wrote:No i don't think Zang is scum.