Left 4 Dead Mafia - Day 6?

[ReaperCharlie]

Also, @ Amished's 1243: I suppose I agree with you.

Looking back, I also see that my FoS from last post was directed toward SPS as well, so I guess I'll make it official:

FoS: Steam-Powered Shovel

[crypto]

Hi there. SPS is town.

Hm. Dr.Cyanide might not have been. But yeah, SPS is.

[ReaperCharlie]

Ok, why is SPS town?

[Amished]

@SPS: re: selective scumhunting: You've said that I had ample scum-motivation to go after Glork N1 (the om-nommed kill); and that Tar was attacking me, giving me scum motivation to go after him (again, the om-nommed kill). You haven't discussed Socrates nor Furry being NK'd; therefore redeeming those NK's to something else and only focusing on one "set" of NK's, attributing both of them to me without really looking at who would benefit from either/both of those deaths. That's why I say you're selective scumhunting.

Ok, so your case (aside from now admitted NK-WIFOM) is that you're following the cop when the person you're following... isn't actually an investigative role..? Seriously, how do you expect anybody to believe your horseshit position when you can't even possibly believe that you're right?

[Steam-Powered Shovel]

Another point: If I was scum, I would probably have killed Glork and Socrates too (especially Socrates). He had good arguments and I would have feared him catching on to me. That being said, whoever made the point in the last couple pages that people don't pay attention to (or care) who was killed, you are absolutely wrong. It is an integral part of scumhunting and cannot be ignored. FoS: YOU, lol

Since you clarified that you meant me, I'm going to have to ask you to back up that position. People do pay attention to NKs, just not substantially so. (And people should look at NKs more often, too.)

You've said that I had ample scum-motivation to go after Glork N1 (the om-nommed kill)

Or Socrates. Proof:

I consider you a very plausible candidate for having killed either Glrok or Socrates.

and that Tar was attacking me, giving me scum motivation to go after him (again, the om-nommed kill)

This is just plain wrong. Completely and utterly wrong.

Ok, so your case (aside from now admitted NK-WIFOM) is that you're following the cop when the person you're following... isn't actually an investigative role..? Seriously, how do you expect anybody to believe your horseshit position when you can't even possibly believe that you're right?

What? I was just using an example to illustrate that your "complaint" was invalid.

[Amished]

Oh, 1080 by Dizzy and your 1081 ran together in my mind, I see where I was mistaken over that.

Fine, I seem to be missing every single point that you're {SPS} trying to make. Put everything that you think is scummy about me together in one place so that you can't say "that wasn't my main point" or anything and we can get to the bottom of this.

[ReaperCharlie]

Another point: If I was scum, I would probably have killed Glork and Socrates too (especially Socrates). He had good arguments and I would have feared him catching on to me. That being said, whoever made the point in the last couple pages that people don't pay attention to (or care) who was killed, you are absolutely wrong. It is an integral part of scumhunting and cannot be ignored. FoS: YOU, lol

Since you clarified that you meant me, I'm going to have to ask you to back up that position.

Ok;

Vote: Steam-Powered Shovel

.

People do pay attention to NKs, just not substantially so. (And people should look at NKs more often, too.)

Yes, people

should

substantially

pay attention to NKs. It is one of the only tools we have to finding out who is scum and who is not.[/quote]

Like Amished, I seem to be missing your points as well. Why are you tunneling on him? Sounds like you're one member of a scum faction gunning for who you think is a member of the

other

scum faction, and the reason we don't get why you're doing it is... perhaps because you possess inside info?

Or am I reading too much into the situation?

[ReaperCharlie]

...I think I spilled a little QuoteFail™ in that last post, mb

[crypto]

Ok, why is SPS town?

Highly sophisticated intuition, my good sir. Last game there was something off about him and he flipped scum. This game there isn't.

[Amished]

So.. essentially a gut-meta... That's almost convincing.

[crypto]

So.. essentially a gut-meta... That's almost convincing.

Thanks, I thought I was getting there. You should vote him and you'll be shocked and awed and happy. Unless you are scum. Which means you must be scum seeing as you are not currently voting him in anticipation of said shock and awe and happiness.

[crypto]

You should just vote him.

[Amished]

Wait, what? Rephrase? I'm already voting SPS ...

[The AI Director]

The Second Vote Count of Day Three

DizzyIzzyB13 (3): almightybob, Starbuck, crypto
Amished (2): DizzyIzzyB13, Steam-Powered Shovel
dramonic (1): Charlie
Steam-Powered Shovel (2): Amished, ReaperCharlie
Charlie (1): jmj3000

Not voting (4): nhammen, dramonic, bv310, SaintKerrigan

Deadline is in 8 days.

[The AI Director]

As the group marches through the abandoned town, someone suddenly shouts... "PEELZ HERE!"

Pain pills

are up for grabs! Since there are

13

people alive, that means only

3 people

are eligible to grab them! Type

Grab: Pain Pills

if you want to go for it!

Modnote: "

GRABBIN PEELZ

" is also totally acceptable.

[Amished]

GRABBIN PEELZ

[nhammen]

Is there any structure to how we are doing this, or is it just first come first serve? Because I remember that I was annoyed at Deathnote for just grabbing straight up and setting this precedent.

[nhammen]

Page 46 is very helpful. That was the last item (from ISOing the mod) and it seems that this policy

is

still in effect. However bob's post (the very helpful part of page 46) shows that Starbuck has claimed an innocent result on jmj, who I was very convinced was scum. Interesting.

Grab: Pain Pills

Reread going smoothly (done with Day 1 again), except I was about to launch a 5 paragraph manifesto of why jmj is obvscum. And now I don't know what is going on (again). I guess that is why you investigated him, Starbuck?

[DizzyIzzyB13]

GRABBEN PEEEEEEEEELZ

, bitches.

[Charlie]

Grab: Pain Pills

My nameclaim is Ellis.

[Charlie]

EBWOP: Ninja'd by Dizzy.

[ReaperCharlie]

Dizzy didn't use the correct syntax; neither did Amished. You may find yourself the proud owner of a brand new bottle of pain pills soon, Charlie! [=]

But I doubt it. Haha

[Charlie]

Nah, Amished did it right. Dizzy used a deadly obvious variation. Check the Modnote above.

[Steam-Powered Shovel]

Yes, people should substantially pay attention to NKs. It is one of the only tools we have to finding out who is scum and who is not.

I think we're in agreement here, RC.

Like Amished, I seem to be missing your points as well. Why are you tunneling on him? Sounds like you're one member of a scum faction gunning for who you think is a member of the other scum faction, and the reason we don't get why you're doing it is... perhaps because you possess inside info?

Or am I reading too much into the situation?

Basically, the main reason is that Glrok had a gut read on him and seriously suspected Amished. Since Glrok is a good scumhunter, I'm quite willing to follow his lead. I suspect the reason you're confused about my reasons is that Amished has consistently misrepresented me. Once I have a little more time, I'll show you the pattern of systemic misrepresentation in Amished's posts. (And that will be the case you asked for, Amished.)

[Amished]

Yeah, that's especially convincing. If the entirety of your case is going to be based on somebody else's thoughts; I'm not going to respond.