I agree, but this has already been pointed out.Fufitive wrote:In context, this was actually the 5th vote on Parama. He switched his RVS and, if you believe him, specifically asked his 8-ball about Parama. Then, claimed it was just an RVS vote to hide the bandwagoning. This was the post that first made me vote for him.
I don't think he was actually FOSing but explaining the mechanics of FOSing. And I don't really understand his explaination anyway. If you FOS everybody but fugitive, you think everybody is suspicous except for fugitive. Isn't that how FOS's work?Fugitive wrote:This is his very next post. After I'm the first to vote for him and bring up any case at all, he immediately claims that he's already FoS'd me and no one else. He's still talking nonsensically to other players, and even unvotes Parama when called on the massive bandwagon trying to shove it off as a reaction test. This post solidified my vote.
The rest of your case is pretty good though and I agree that we will learn a lot from his lynch.
Is this really all you have to say?DocPotter wrote:Unvote, Vote Espeonage
Mostly to correct the count.
Though Fugi does present a compelling case.