To preface this: Sorry for my absence, couldn't stay awake at all Thursday night, Bio AP coming up &c. (and SATs tomorrow morning as well).
Okay, so lemme get this straight.
Innocent Investigation/Claimed Masonhood = Off the Table for Now
Ooba
Alm
Iecerint
SD
Flava
Andrius
ShadowDancer wrote:At first glance that makes it a good choice for a fake claim, of course. How ever, a fake claim of an existingrole provokes a counter claim - that is unless Alma is Scum and Ares is scum but nor Alma is not Ares...
Yeah, or the Mod provided safeclaims (that is, told the scum a few charcters he deliberately left out of the game). That's always my first assumption in games like these. Ooba's claim that he at one point hada Vig ability hold a lot more weight, in my opinion.
ooba wrote:@Iece, SD: Are you both Masons? Your soft claiming and following each other is neither here nor there. Any good scum would have been able to spot this on Day 1. Is your alignment confirmed to each other?
Weirdest. Post. Evar. Seriously, who saw that one coming/who would want to try to out masons if he thought he saw them? If you're Town and you see this, you shut up; there's generally no good to be gained from it if you're right. If you're scum, well . . . I could see rolefishing value in it. The fact that I can only see scum motivation for such a thing is bad bad bad. And considering Ooba's prior claim - rolecop? And then again LC claims he protected Ooba, which may account for lack of kills which would point to Town/not a specific type of scum Ooba. And of course he's Athena, which seems fairly Town for all intents and purposes. Doubt that he has a power which could cause him to be revealed as a role he isn't. Nevermind, I'd forgotten some of this, so throwing Ooba into list of players-not-to-lynch today.
Jack wrote:The fact that they are both majorly protecting alma is looking bad right now.
Well, if they're confirmed-to-one-another Masons and one has an investigation on Alm, it would kinda make sense.
I'd be more likely to be on something like 3:1:8 than 2:2:8 but that's just me.
Andrius wrote:Iece said him and SD are alignment confirmed masons. A quick question from a newer player: how likely is it that scum try to pass themselves off as masons? It seems like it would be a good idea, but I haven't played in many non-newbie games here yet, so I wouldn't know. (This is my first non-newbie game I got into.)
Might work okay in the short term; long-term it's a huge gamble most scumbags wouldn't want to try; it takes courage, luck, and lots of attention to detail to pull off. Offhand I can't remember an instance of scum even attempting it.
Andrius wrote:Needless to say, I'm kind of worried that the masons might be a cult. Mafia to a lesser degree, unless someone tells me the likelyhood of mafia claiming masons.
Again, not a major concern (especially given that the leader would need a Night 0/pregame recruit ability to be confident in pulling off the fakeclaims). I'll start being concerned if one mason dies and flips non-Town or neither of them die for a long time and people claim to have not protected them or whatnot. Anyway, which of the gods would be a Cult Leader, anyway?
If we want to keep our noses out of both claimers and claimees, at first glance I'd vote Joh over Jack. Had some bad feelings on Joh yesterday but felt all right overall about Jack, Town-on-Town vibes on the very early Jack/Iec argument.
Andrius wrote:But perhaps we should look into LC's alignment, because its not feasibly hard for a mafia to claim Cop, and prove their scumbuddy innocent.
Or claim an innocent on a true innocent and look the Townier for it when all's said and done.
All things being equal, we'd rather lynch claimees over people claimed to be Town. Scum might/might not lie about results. However, between possible Cop Insanity and Godfather(s). I'd have to think about the utility of putting claimers as well as claimees into the 'we're not touching these today' pool or not.
I can't tell what's meant with this Wiki article Andrius linked to/this 'Sacred Saga' stuff.
Unvote; Vote: Joh
Until further rereads on Jack and anyone else we're not touching with a 12-fott pole today.