Yes, I do. But nobody has really given a case on me. With the exception of you, and I responded to that as best I could.antiximo wrote:and zang, you do notice that two people are hinting at you being the lynch of the day right..?
Well, it depends on what you mean by good.Espionage wrote:Because Zang is a very good scum.
He could be newbie scum.Antiximo wrote:I want him to talk. My reasoning for thinking he's town is that he's newbie. While he's either newbie or scum, would town want either of them late game?
Fugitive wrote:Oh hey, I can post again.
Just want to point out one quick thing. Look how quickly FakeGod jumped onto the case against Esp and sided with Pie. I know it seems a bit obvious, but he is new (right?), and new scum, from what I've seen, tend to do this. They take sides with their more experienced scum buddies and jump onto any little case presented against someone.In my experience, newb scum usually try their best not to vote for their buddies. This, I know for sure. About your theory, depending on whether scum are allowed to talk pre-D1 or not (also depending on playstyles and experience and what-have-you), usually determines if newbscum vote with their buddies or avoid doing so. Not like this really matters since I am town and I believe FG is town for the time being.
Quite frankly, the case against Esp that Pie just brought up was simply due to wording. Yes, Esp did downplay his aggression a bit, but people can change their minds. Now, I'm not by any means defending Esp, he's got a few bleeps on my scumdar, but what's being discussed right now is ridiculous.There's a difference between changing your mind, and after people start suspecting you, you do a complete 180 on your views and start to backtrack.
I'm liking my Fake-Pie scum team more and more, if not only for Fake giving Pie away. If Fake flips scum Pie has some explaining to do.Yes, I realize that if I'm wrong and FG is scum, then I'll be a prime lynch target, most likely. I do have some doubt about FG, but I'm going with my gut for now.
Lastly thing: lol@lynching someone who could be good scum.Agreed.
Uh... what?Antiximo wrote:Also, FG, i think you should extraordinarily helpful if not any other time, now. If you are town, it will do us nothing but good.
@inflatablepie - I'm voting so he can talk, I want him to actually do some damn good to town, if he's being worthless, that's more of a reason to consider him scummy, this person isn't assured to be a townie just because i have a sense that's he's a newbie, in the case that he's a newbie town, he needs to step up and be able to catch contradictions just like everyone else, because chances are, mafia will keep him alive for that reason alone.InflatablePie wrote:
FoS: Anti- newbie or not, a townie is a townie. You think someone is town, you don't vote them. You vote people who you think are scum. That's how this works.
Antiximo wrote:Also, FG, i think you should extraordinarily helpful if not any other time, now. If you are town, it will do us nothing but good.
). Yes, I really want to know what you were asking me. (shakes head)Antiximo wrote: @Fakegod - You really want to know what I was asking you? I'm asking you to help town, and do it now. Stop defending your own buttocks or parroting and legitimately help.
I like how you don't heed Anti's advice at all and this post is still just a giant defense of yourself. >_>FakeGod wrote:Yes, I really want to know what you were asking me. (shakes head)Antiximo wrote: @Fakegod - You really want to know what I was asking you? I'm asking you to help town, and do it now. Stop defending your own buttocks or parroting and legitimately help.
That shouldn't be a case in any situation. So you are intentionally writing weirdly worded questions? Because I really had no idea what you were trying to tell me.
and have you seen my vote and the reasoning behind it? And what do you mean you want me to talk? I've been very active in the game! and I'm parroting? I only asked what in the world you asked me in post 250, because it was worded poorly. And yes, I already admitted that this is my second game in the forums. I never asked you to consider me differently because of it. No need to put me on a pedestal, sheesh.
I didn't jump. I simply reread and made a conclusion, then expressed my thoughts. And my logic hasn't been brought up before: hence it was original, and I'm not just bandwagonning on people.Fugitive wrote: Just want to point out one quick thing. Look how quickly FakeGod jumped onto the case against Esp and sided with Pie. I know it seems a bit obvious, but he is new (right?), and new scum, from what I've seen, tend to do this. They take sides with their more experienced scum buddies and jump onto any little case presented against someone.
I'm at L-2 (or soon to be).Fugitive wrote: I like how you don't heed Anti's advice at all and this post is still just a giant defense of yourself. >_>
People get defensive when they're at L-2. Good idea, I'll do a PBP tomorrow and state my main case.FakeGod wrote:I'm at L-2 (or soon to be).Fugitive wrote: I like how you don't heed Anti's advice at all and this post is still just a giant defense of yourself. >_>
Fugi, state your case against me, so that I may give you a response.
broomhead wrote:MOD: I feel like in post 250 and 252 Anti voted for FG. As far as I can see that is not represented in the vote counts.
StrangerCoug wrote:Antiximo's vote on FakeGod doesn't count as he needs to unvote Brandi. Yes, I've checked.
