Mini 948 - Victorian Vampire - Game Over


User avatar
Darox
Darox
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Darox
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2970
Joined: May 10, 2008
Location: The Future

Post Post #450 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:55 pm

Post by Darox »

NOT IMPRESSED.
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #451 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:08 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

Hey Darox. Could you be persuaded to switch to Nobody Special? I'm more sure he's scum.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #452 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:29 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

TheSkeward wrote:Hey Darox. Could you be persuaded to switch to Nobody Special? I'm more sure he's scum.
Seriously? Your vote depends on Darox's vote? Why are you voting me when you think he's scummier?
Larger FoS on Skeward
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
Darox
Darox
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Darox
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2970
Joined: May 10, 2008
Location: The Future

Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:34 pm

Post by Darox »

Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?

I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #454 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Darox wrote:NOT IMPRESSED.
Wasn't meant to impress anyone. It was meant to state who I think was scum and to convince people that I'm not scum and others are. Not to mention your only reasoning behind your vote for me was that I hadn't been posting a lot (which I've posted more than some people still, content wise and post wise).
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #455 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:36 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Darox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?

I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
How about the case I just posted?
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
Darox
Darox
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Darox
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2970
Joined: May 10, 2008
Location: The Future

Post Post #456 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:40 pm

Post by Darox »

Your case is lackluster.

I am not impressed with it. It did not sway my opinions on NS or yourself.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:42 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Darox wrote:Your case is lackluster.

I am not impressed with it. It did not sway my opinions on NS or yourself.
Why? And the only thing you had on me was that I wasn't posting, and now I am, so...
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:00 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

Darox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?

I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
Nobody Special
Doesn't like Darox's nameclaim.
"Very skeptical of Josh". No given reason. At this point Josh is obv the D1 lynch.
Says SpryeX is "less jovial, less outspoken" than usual.
Is way, way too ready to lynch Josh, for "purposely misinterpreting things" - his example is the slippery slope debate. Concludes with "Please, get lynched. Vote: Josh. Still on Page 7. Still reading. Still happy with a Josh lynch."
When SpryeX (not harshly at all, complete with a wink smiley face) responds to his comments, he says "Just observing, sheesh. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Have NONE of you on this whole fucking board EVER heard of '"hyperbole?'"
D2, he votes a lurker. Laughably, he also says "I also have some suspicions about Darox (admitted active lurking, distancing from Josh)"
When Darox pressures CMAR, he says to CMAR, "So, what you're
really
saying is that your target ceased to be a target, and, for whatever reason, you declined to even look for another target. Gotcha."

In essence: he seems to think everyone is scum. As soon as anyone is under any kind of pressure at all, he jumps onto them as though he's always been there. Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.

I'm definitely happy with a CMAR lynch. I'm fairly sure one is scum, and it's possible both are scum, and I don't see the other contributing positively to the game anyway. But I think NS is more likely to be scum, and CMAR's more likely to be just stupid.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:07 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

TheSkeward wrote:
Darox wrote:Got any reasons/post #'s/vague gut feelings to back that up?

I'm kind of neutral to NS right now.
Nobody Special
Doesn't like Darox's nameclaim.
"Very skeptical of Josh". No given reason. At this point Josh is obv the D1 lynch.
Says SpryeX is "less jovial, less outspoken" than usual.
Is way, way too ready to lynch Josh, for "purposely misinterpreting things" - his example is the slippery slope debate. Concludes with "Please, get lynched. Vote: Josh. Still on Page 7. Still reading. Still happy with a Josh lynch."
When SpryeX (not harshly at all, complete with a wink smiley face) responds to his comments, he says "Just observing, sheesh. Don't get your panties in a bunch. Have NONE of you on this whole fucking board EVER heard of '"hyperbole?'"
D2, he votes a lurker. Laughably, he also says "I also have some suspicions about Darox (admitted active lurking, distancing from Josh)"
When Darox pressures CMAR, he says to CMAR, "So, what you're
really
saying is that your target ceased to be a target, and, for whatever reason, you declined to even look for another target. Gotcha."

In essence: he seems to think everyone is scum. As soon as anyone is under any kind of pressure at all, he jumps onto them as though he's always been there. Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.

I'm definitely happy with a CMAR lynch. I'm fairly sure one is scum, and it's possible both are scum, and I don't see the other contributing positively to the game anyway. But I think NS is more likely to be scum, and CMAR's more likely to be just stupid.
Why am I stupid again? Because I didn't post for a while, I spectated about the setup, and I provided cases on my suspects while defending myself from every argument?
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:08 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

Why am I stupid again? Because I didn't post for a while, I spectated about the setup, and I provided cases on my suspects while defending myself from every argument?
The grownups are talking right now. Go to your room.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:11 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

TheSkeward wrote:
Why am I stupid again? Because I didn't post for a while, I spectated about the setup, and I provided cases on my suspects while defending myself from every argument?
The grownups are talking right now. Go to your room.
Skeward's hypocritical statement wrote:
Furthermore, whenever he perceives any kind of pressure on himself (above, in the response to Darox, and also in the back-and-forths with CMAR), he responds with venomous ad-hom.
Noted that you can't answer the question
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
Darox
Darox
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Darox
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2970
Joined: May 10, 2008
Location: The Future

Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:20 pm

Post by Darox »

That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:24 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.

*crawls off to his room*
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:32 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

Unvote; Vote: Nobody Special
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #465 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:45 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

CryMeARiver wrote:
Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.

*crawls off to his room*
Image
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 2:59 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

TheSkeward wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.

*crawls off to his room*
Image
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:01 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

CryMeARiver wrote:
TheSkeward wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.

*crawls off to his room*
Image
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.
You just don't have my animal magnetism.
User avatar
CryMeARiver
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CryMeARiver
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3460
Joined: January 6, 2010

Post Post #468 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 3:03 pm

Post by CryMeARiver »

TheSkeward wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
TheSkeward wrote:
CryMeARiver wrote:
Darox wrote:That's pretty convincing. Yeah, I could go for a NS lynch over CMAR.
Let's get the ball rolling.

Vote: Nobody Special
I am stunned. He virtually posted the same thing I posted.

*crawls off to his room*
Image
Seriously though, you pretty much posted what I did.
You just don't have my animal magnetism.
That's why animals hate me. OHHHHHH'
Image
Show
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.


"postgame i'm going to pee on you gandalf

pee on you" - Chesskid

V/LA (No access) from July 8th - July 14th


CMAR :cop:
User avatar
SpyreX
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
User avatar
User avatar
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
POWERFUL WIZARD
Posts: 18596
Joined: April 24, 2008

Post Post #469 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:07 pm

Post by SpyreX »

I could go on with the largest ISO ever on how he tunneled Josh all of D1 and me all of D2 and how he has been misrepresenting me and providing cases without validity on me and how he is still obsessed with Josh even on D2, but if you can't already see that and you need an ISO to establish that, you can do it yourself. All of this could easily be misguided townie though, so I'm still not sure on you.
:roll:

Seems like I've been accused of misreprsenting someone earlier this game.

Funny how that turned out.

I'm not digging / understanding this switch.
Show
I always lynch scum... sometimes they're just not mafia. :P

Town: (49-47-1)
Scum: (23-11)
Third Party: (2-0)
Proud member of BaM
User avatar
TheSkeward
TheSkeward
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
TheSkeward
Goon
Goon
Posts: 156
Joined: March 26, 2010

Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:14 pm

Post by TheSkeward »

Hey Spry. Switch to NS please?
User avatar
SpyreX
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
User avatar
User avatar
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
POWERFUL WIZARD
Posts: 18596
Joined: April 24, 2008

Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:16 pm

Post by SpyreX »

I'm not sold from what I've seen - not enough to warrant the jump.
Show
I always lynch scum... sometimes they're just not mafia. :P

Town: (49-47-1)
Scum: (23-11)
Third Party: (2-0)
Proud member of BaM
User avatar
ElectricBadger
ElectricBadger
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ElectricBadger
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1255
Joined: June 22, 2009

Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:02 pm

Post by ElectricBadger »

Vote Count:

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

(2) CryMeARiver: SpyreX, cruelty
(1) Cruelty: Ooba
(3) Nobody Special: CryMeARiver, Darox, TheSkeward

(4) Not Voting: easjo682, Zang, MagnaofIllusion, Nobody Special

Day One ends by May 13th at the toll of midnight PST.


User avatar
cruelty
cruelty
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
cruelty
Goon
Goon
Posts: 950
Joined: July 14, 2009

Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:38 pm

Post by cruelty »

mod can we get a prob on easjo
the nexus of the crisis
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...

Post Post #474 (ISO) » Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:56 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

ooba wrote:@Magna: When you posted your second last post (before the V\LA notice), you must have been able to see Cruelty's vote. Why didn't you ask him anything about it?
Because the only reason for vote from the blue like that is reaction fishing. I don’t see any point in responding to what amounts to an RVS style vote. Had he attempted, for example, to put some sort of case with it I would have responded. But he didn’t.
cruelty wrote: ooba i aint gonna answer that right now.
So you placed a vote with no support and aren’t going to bother to respond when questioned why? That’s certainly not pro-town in any way, shape or form. I see you responded much later (444) but the attitude you are expressing still is not pro-town.
Sprex wrote:While this makes me a little it did give me a missing the trees for the forest moment: Josh was a Doctor.

No way in hell he didn't know who the scum were.
If this circumstance is indeed the set-up and he was a traitor then logically the Mafia didn’t know his identity. So anyone attacking him (including yourself) should get no ‘town cred’, as it were, regarding lynching Josh.
cruelty wrote:well i guess that'd depend on the reason for my prod - was i bored with the stagnation, or did my inactivity cause said stagnation?
You were proded for not posting. Whether you were bored or not is irrelevant. Not posting and then complaining you were bored is just plain stupid. The game is as active as all the participants make it.
ooba wrote: Just curious – what brought about this question?
Given that you were a part of Weeds Mafia also I should think you would know exactly why I posted this. For those interested look up Mini 938 and specifically Ythan and McGriddle. Knowing players have a history (usually involving animosity) is something I want to know when assesseing their interactions with each other.
cruelty wrote:also lol @ bringing up my speedlynch post. world's most brazen scum, right here. gimme a break.
Then are you the world’s worst town scumhunter? What possible pro-town purpose does the original post have? Answering the valid point about the post by WIFOMing that ‘no scum would make a post like that’ is even scummier.

Nobody I'd like to see your response to TheSkeward and Cry's cases on you.

@Zang could you elaborate a bit on your suspicions?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”