Pick Your Power III: A Brave New World

Zang · Post Post #1150 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:19 am

Official Vote Count

Players needed to Lynch : 8

Hoopla

- 2 -

DrippingGoofball

,

Socrates

- (L-6)

Players not voting - 12 - 12keyblade, CryMeARiver, Ellibereth, Faraday, Fate, Hoopla, mb53, Parama, Pomegranate, PranaDevil, Sando, Zang

I would like a massclaim

And also I don't really agree with DGB's case on hoopla. I can see both advantages and disadvantages of a massclaim and that being on either side is null. And why hoopla? He wasn't the only one against a massclaim.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1151 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:44 am

Hoopla wrote:I'm sorry I don't play to your standards DGB.

Consistently defending scumbags and rounding up the townies for executions... that's my standard of SCUM play.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1152 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:44 am

Zang wrote:I would like a massclaim

And also I don't really agree with DGB's case on hoopla. I can see both advantages and disadvantages of a massclaim and that being on either side is null. And why hoopla? He wasn't the only one against a massclaim.

You think my case is all about massclaims? Did you read it?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1153 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:45 am

## unvote
## unvote: Zang

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1154 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:45 am

## vote: Zang

Hoopla · Post Post #1155 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:47 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Hoopla wrote:I'm sorry I don't play to your standards DGB.
Consistently defending scumbags and rounding up the townies for executions... that's my standard of SCUM play.

It's also the standard of town having a poor game too - I'm sure you must have had one or two somewhere along the line. But I don't expect you to see purity in my motivations.

Hoopla · Post Post #1156 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:48 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:

## vote: Zang

lol

Zang · Post Post #1157 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Zang wrote:I would like a massclaim

And also I don't really agree with DGB's case on hoopla. I can see both advantages and disadvantages of a massclaim and that being on either side is null. And why hoopla? He wasn't the only one against a massclaim.
You think my case is all about massclaims? Did you read it?

I did read it but massclaim is the only one I'm arguing about.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1158 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:55 am

Hoopla wrote:
DrippingGoofball wrote:

## vote: Zang
lol

You forgot to vote Zang.

Hoopla · Post Post #1159 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:56 am

I'd rather craft a plan, than act on irrational impulses. That's for Day 1.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1160 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:56 am

Zang wrote:I did read it but massclaim is the only one I'm arguing about.

OK you're right, so we're lynching you now.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1161 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:57 am

Hoopla wrote:I'd rather craft a plan, than act on irrational impulses. That's for Day 1.

Howzit working for you?

Hoopla · Post Post #1162 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:58 am

Why don't we massclaim tomorrow then?

Fate · Post Post #1163 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:06 am

We will, after we lynch scum.

100% game, though I'm less sure about Hoopla than any other lynch so far. Scum had far better devious role combos than what they choose, which was essentially 3 roles just to keep the vigs alive longer.

But lolwifom. I want the hammer this time, Parama

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1164 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:06 am

Hoopla wrote:Why don't we massclaim tomorrow then?

We already know where all the scummy roles are (they're dead).

What's the advantage now?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1165 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:07 am

Except Socrates of course. He's still alive.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1166 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:08 am

Fate wrote:We will, after we lynch scum.

100% game, though I'm less sure about Hoopla than any other lynch so far.

Do you have a working meta? I'm wavering on Hoopla though the evidence is solid. I need re-assurance.

Fate · Post Post #1167 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:08 am

Socrates, janitor pom tonight for teh lulz.

Oh and to prove yourself... But mainly for lulZ.

Fate · Post Post #1168 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:11 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Fate wrote:We will, after we lynch scum.

100% game, though I'm less sure about Hoopla than any other lynch so far.

I've never seen Hoopla wrong so much as town, or fail to gambit as town (aka sign up thread where she didn't change her numbers like I did post roll)

Do you have a working meta? I'm wavering on Hoopla though the evidence is solid. I need re-assurance.

Hoopla · Post Post #1169 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:13 am

Well, now I think about it, massclaim tomorrow is probably a slightly better option than today. Scum's next two moves are basically chosen for them, so they won't deviate into the pool of unknown roles, which means we get more information for tomorrow. I'm looking at you gunsmith.

We should have enough innocents/prob-innocents to break the game tomorrow, I think. How about I be investigated by the gunsmith tonight?

Hoopla · Post Post #1170 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:16 am

Fate wrote:

I've never seen Hoopla wrong so much as town, or fail to gambit as town (aka sign up thread where she didn't change her numbers like I did post roll)

Yeah, that would have been a pro-town move!

Fate · Post Post #1171 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:17 am

Waste an investigation to buy your buddy more time? Hmmm. Here's literally no way town can lose with all our innocents and 6 lynches.

But I guess you have to play to your win con till the end, eh?

Hoopla · Post Post #1172 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:18 am

Fate wrote:Waste an investigation to buy your buddy more time? Hmmm. Here's literally no way town can lose with all our innocents and 6 lynches.

But I guess you have to play to your win con till the end, eh?

5 lynches?

Fate · Post Post #1173 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:19 am

Hoopla wrote:
Fate wrote:

I've never seen Hoopla wrong so much as town, or fail to gambit as town (aka sign up thread where she didn't change her numbers like I did post roll)
Yeah, that would have been a pro-town move!

Worked like a charm for me.

How come I'm not a suspect of yours again if I'm so antitown? You think I'm above ruthlessly bussing?

MwhHAAhAHAP

PranaDevil · Post Post #1174 (ISO) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:21 am

Fate wrote:Socrates, janitor pom tonight for teh lulz.

Oh and to prove yourself... But mainly for lulZ.

How will janitoring Pom prove him as town? It wont help him.

Hell, at this stage I doubt the Janitor role would help anyone as it's not going to benefit scum, nor will it benefit town. It's just a non-entity anyway, may as well not use it at all.