here come some of those there quote stripes
Jack wrote:She said cobalt was wrong once again, and that it wasn't surprising because [link to your post about cobalt], implying that cobalt is always wrong. That's pretty strong.
I read that as more of a joking, lighthearted way of saying that she wasn't concerned about the vote. Note that, as I said before, I do not think this is a good way to respond to a vote, but I don't think it's a suspicious way to do so either.
Jack wrote:You really like the "hurting/beneficial" line huh? Scum are trying to do "beneficial" things remember. What's relevant is my gut. i.e. you have to decide whether someone doing something beneficial is really trying to help the town, or just trying to look like it, and whether someone hurting the town is doing so for scummy reasons, or for one of the many reasons townies do it.
Yes, I think I do. And I understand that one has to make that distinction, it is not a rule that someone doing beneficial things is town and that someone hurting things is scum. However, it is worth looking at, analyzing, and coming to a decision either way and I have clearly chosen what my gut told me, like you say you have.
Jack wrote:It doesn't sound particularly concerned. It's more of a "oh you two and your arguing" post.
It seems like you've been working your way up to this vote, which is what scum often do because they don't really suspect the person.
My vote comes from you responses to this discussion and the actions that sparked it, not just the actions. I don't like the way you're defending it; my "gut" makes me think you are worth a vote right now.
UncertainKitten wrote:To be clear, the unvote is one of those things that just overall feels like "Look at me I'm so conscientious and protown", and also would theoretically make you look better were I lynched anyway.
Good to note that there were no posts from Pitt between his vote and unvote. Still being very diplomatic.
Pittbunny wrote:I'm going to have to agree with UK on the "What the hell are you smoking Cobalt" platform...Cobalt, content. I want some. I don't care if you provide nothing but flowery absurdities, just provide something that doesn't make you look more VI than I already do.
So you went from voting, to unvoting, to completely dismissing the person who started the wagon in less than a page? Amazing. It's also very cool how you can call out Cobalt of all people for CONTENT when you have actually advocated fluff and posted less relevant content in all your many posts than Cobalt has in his few.
Pittbunny wrote:As to rolefishing, why shouldn't I rolefish?
My head hurt after reading this. At this point I'm not sure if you're scum or just dumb.
