Mini 946 The new Zachtown (Game Over!)

[Konowa]

unvote;
vote Alexithymia

@Alex: Less babbling, more explaining.

Looking over vote counts VP and DRK both being on all three of the large D1 wagons is making me think. Votecounts 1, 2, and final for reference.

[Lacey]

@Lacey: With the quality of scummers in here, reading through once gave me a big WTF. Explain how not being able to read the game is scummy.

Can you state this in a clearer way? I have no idea what you are asking.

Also with your vote count sitting at L-1, and the scummy behavior of the previous two players in your slot, you should be giving us a more thorough analysis and building better cases than you are.

[Konowa]

@Lacey: When you voted Mae, you quoted her post where she said she was having a hard time reading the game. You responded with "Nu-uh. This game is easy." Besides a difference of opinion with Mae, do you think that her having a hard time reading could have contributed to her not posting?

Also, I am well aware that I am at L-1. Thank you for your concern though. I am waiting for Alex to come back with his analysis of said "lulz reactions" list. I think that going "It was all for the reactions" and then never following up on it is scummy. To top it off, Alex stated in post 49 that it was for reactions and then when I asked him to follow through, he repeats

why

he did it, instead of

what

conclusions he got out of it.

Your opinion on that?

[Alexithymia]

Um...Konowa, you asked for an explanation and I gave you one. I am keeping my eye on those players because of how they reacted to my selfvoting What is intriguing though is that Sotty came across my RVS shananigans in the first Zachtown game and attacked me for them here. That's a bit of an inconsistant meta there dont you think. And the fact that she has been on all of the big D1 bandwagons. It wouldnt surprise me if she was the third scum.

So basically my scum list so far is Maemuki, Jason and Sotty.

brb

[Zachrulez]

6th vote count of day 2:

Konowa - 4 (VP Baltar, Lacey, Col.Cathart, Alexithymia)
Jeromus- 1 (DeathRowKitty)
Col.Cathart - 1 (JasonT1981)
Alexithymia - 1 (Konowa)

Not voting (Jeromus, Vi)

With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch.

If I made any mistakes, let me know asap.

DL is May 6th at 1pm CST.

[Konowa]

So basically my scum list so far is Maemuki, Jason and Sotty.

Can we lynch Alex now?

[Alexithymia]

Oh lol. Konowa replaced Mae. We can add OMGUS to that one then.

[Col.Cathart]

I'm in kinda hurry, so more from me tomorrow or later tonight. There's a thing though that needs immediate comment:

So basically my scum list so far is Maemuki, Jason and

Sotty

What?

[Alexithymia]

You obv skimmed my post.

[Konowa]

ROFL

Please, can we lynch Alex now?

[Col.Cathart]

You obv skimmed my post.

You obv skimmed the night kills...

[Alexithymia]

Stop being so opportunistic. Im under fire right now. You're at L-1. You're trying to do everything you can to lynch 'the other guy'. That's scummy and self-preservationist, which is also scummy.

[Alexithymia]

You obv skimmed my post.

You obv skimmed the night kills...

Did you just suggest I'm not scum? Lol.

[Konowa]

That obviously being a cross-post makes things just that much more delicious.

@Alex: Why don't you ask Sotty who she thinks is scum?

[Alexithymia]

Oh...and to think I was going to iso her and call her out for lurking too...wow. I've been distracted lately, pregnancy scare aswell as hypogylcaemic attacks arent cool.

[jasonT1981]

@Alex: Hi. After you follow up on that list, could you be a doll and explain why you think jason is scum?

Alex, why did you avoid this?

if your answer was in your ramblings in 424 about who was on the wagon I direct you back to this...

------

Jason

Random vote with a fake claim (Yay!), nothing wrong with that.

I get a very town read from his second post, though. It's the way town would think;

not getting hung up over someone voting during the RVS, but how the other players react to that vote.

Conclusion - So far town. Needs to talk tomorrow.

Unless I am mistaken and you avoided the question about me?

[Alexithymia]

Jason, I also said I didn't think all the scum would be on the wagon. That would be scum suicide. I didn't avoid the question. It'll just take me a while to write out and i'd rather answer the shorter questions being put forward to me now.

[jasonT1981]

OK fair enough, I thought that was your answer to that question.

[Konowa]

Hi jason. There is a question for you as well in 421. I think I need to reword it better though.

In 417, you state that Col. has addressed the issue you have with him. Your vote is still on him, so I take it that his answer not satisfy you? Do you a) find the reasoning for his votes scummy or b) find that the fact that he put two L-1 votes scummy?

If a) What about his reasoning do you not like?
If b) Explain how L-1 is any more suspicious than any other vote on the wagon.

[Lacey]

@Lacey: When you voted Mae, you quoted her post where she said she was having a hard time reading the game. You responded with "Nu-uh. This game is easy." Besides a difference of opinion with Mae, do you think that her having a hard time reading could have contributed to her not posting?

Requires too much speculation as to Mae's motives. As I'm not psychic I can't comment. But to say the game is a hard read would be disingenuous.

To top it off, Alex stated in post 49 that it was for reactions and then when I asked him to follow through, he repeats

why

he did it, instead of

what

conclusions he got out of it.

Your opinion on that?

Alex/Haylen has been pretty scummy from the get go. S/he is not scum hunting, and hasn't posted any substantial conclusions.

Combined with Her/his calling out sotty for being scum just proves Alex/Haylen isn't reading the game. So I'm pretty comfortable with my scum read of him/her. I'd be in favor of an Alex/Haylen lynch.

What concerns me though is how quickly you're trying to shift position off of your slot. You're pointing a lot of fingers without addressing the fact that you've replaced into the scummiest slot in the game.

[jasonT1981]

Hi jason. There is a question for you as well in 421. I think I need to reword it better though.

In 417, you state that Col. has addressed the issue you have with him. Your vote is still on him, so I take it that his answer not satisfy you? Do you a) find the reasoning for his votes scummy or b) find that the fact that he put two L-1 votes scummy?

If a) What about his reasoning do you not like?
If b) Explain how L-1 is any more suspicious than any other vote on the wagon.

I just think its a way of pushing the lynch forward without him having to answer for his actions, most of the time the final hammer gets the questioning....I think he was trying to avoid that.

Its more convienient for him as scum to make the -1 vote, than the actual hammer... less to answer for (In my own opinion). It's the fact he has now done it twice is the major stand out point to me... seems pre-meditated so he does not have to be burdened with the hammer.

[Konowa]

@Lacey: Uhh, what exactly is it that you want me to do? I am not going to roll over and die. Sorry. The only way for me to "address this issue" is to find scum.

[jasonT1981]

Basically, I seem to find more often than enough it is a townie that ends up making the hammer... scum would not as it draws too much attention to them.

I think Col knows this, (that it would bring unwanted attention on him) and it is the reason why he is placing the -1 vote so conviently.

[Konowa]

@jason: Your logic is bad, I just do not know if you are scum for it or not.
Opinion on Alex?

[Lacey]

@Lacey: Uhh, what exactly is it that you want me to do? I am not going to roll over and die. Sorry. The only way for me to "address this issue" is to find scum.

Oh I'd love you to find scum. But right now you're trying to coast on scum hunting by parroting recently suggested theories without adding new info yourself. My guess is you're hoping aggressive play will cause others to forget that you've yet to add an original case.

What I'd like you to do is read the game again, and come back with detailed cases against your suspects with some original evidence or ideas to add to the game.