Why?Espeonage wrote:I see the case on Sando but I REALLY don't like Poms 'fake' claim.
Reading the thread now.
Why?Espeonage wrote:I see the case on Sando but I REALLY don't like Poms 'fake' claim.
But then when I'd flip scum you'd suspect them more. And if I was tracked, I'd be proven scum. There are much more convenient and less obscure fakeclaims for me.Espeonage wrote:You can go around declaring that your buddies are town when you survive the night and it just too perfect.
AndPatrick wrote:Votecount
RichardGHP (6) -- Porochaz, Faraday, bv310, NickF227, Pomegranate, boberz
bv310 (7) -- Papa Zito, Seraphim, Espeonage, farside22, curiouskarmadog, RichardGHP, Albert B. Rampage
Espeonage (1) -- Ojanen
dybeck (1) -- Sando
NickF227 (2) -- Jahudo, Anon
Porochaz (1) -- Javert
Seraphim (1) -- Amished
boberz (1) -- dybeck
Not voting: Nobody
20 alive, 11 to lynch.
Deadline: April 8th, 11 pm GMT.
Patrick wrote:Votecount
RichardGHP (7) -- Porochaz, Faraday, bv310, NickF227, Pomegranate, boberz, Albert B. Rampage
bv310 (6) -- Papa Zito, Seraphim, Espeonage, farside22, curiouskarmadog, RichardGHP
Espeonage (1) -- Ojanen
dybeck (1) -- Sando
NickF227 (2) -- Jahudo, Anon
Porochaz (1) -- Javert
Seraphim (1) -- Amished
boberz (1) -- dybeck
Not voting: Nobody
20 alive, 11 to lynch.
Deadline: April 8th, 11 pm GMT.
AndPatrick wrote:Votecount
RichardGHP (7) -- Porochaz, Faraday, bv310, NickF227, Pomegranate, boberz, Sando
bv310 (5) -- Papa Zito, Seraphim, Espeonage, curiouskarmadog, Anon
Espeonage (1) -- Ojanen
Seraphim (1) -- Javert
boberz (2) -- dybeck, RichardGHP
Pomegranate (4) -- farside22, Albert B. Rampage, Jahudo, Amished
Not voting: Nobody
20 alive, 11 to lynch.
Deadline: April 8th, 11 pm GMT.
I think some answers can be found in here.Patrick wrote:Votecount
RichardGHP (4) -- Porochaz, Faraday, bv310, Pomegranate
bv310 (10) -- Papa Zito, Seraphim, Espeonage, curiouskarmadog, Anon, RichardGHP, NickF227, boberz, farside22, Sando
Seraphim (1) -- Javert
boberz (1) -- dybeck
Pomegranate (4) -- Albert B. Rampage, Jahudo, Amished, Ojanen
Not voting: Nobody
20 alive, 11 to lynch.
Deadline: April 8th, 11 pm GMT.
ABR, what BS are you talking about?Albert B. Rampage wrote:O.K. I've reached my bullshit threshold.
Unvote, vote Pom
Im not entirely sure what the case against you is. However I am interested in what your point is here?Sando wrote:I just did an ISO of you, and using the 'ctrl-f' function, you literally haven't used my name today until you voted me.curiouskarmadog wrote:Need to catch up, I find it funny that Sando seems to have no clue why I am voting him…I haven’t posted that much in the game…is it that hard to figure out?
That I have NFI what his case against me is...Porochaz wrote:Im not entirely sure what the case against you is. However I am interested in what your point is here?Sando wrote:I just did an ISO of you, and using the 'ctrl-f' function, you literally haven't used my name today until you voted me.curiouskarmadog wrote:Need to catch up, I find it funny that Sando seems to have no clue why I am voting him…I haven’t posted that much in the game…is it that hard to figure out?
then I dont think you really iso-ed me then...just because I didnt type your name out doesnt mean I didnt quote something you said and then say "I liked you before this statement"....Sando wrote:I just did an ISO of you, and using the 'ctrl-f' function, you literally haven't used my name today until you voted me.curiouskarmadog wrote:Need to catch up, I find it funny that Sando seems to have no clue why I am voting him…I haven’t posted that much in the game…is it that hard to figure out?
If she is telling the truth, then she is sort of a weak cop....scum wont let her stay around....but if she can confirm people she can be an asset to us. I agree I would like to see her lynched, especially after her play yesterday....but I am suggesting we let her live another day or two. Lynch her later....they only way her information will be helpful is IF she is dead (or completely confirmed)..when she dies I want 2-3 people to be confirmed....Seraphim wrote:I see what you're talking about, CKD, but I still think that Pom is the better lynch today. I see no benefit to keeping her alive besides a shitton of WIFOM and no one has convinced me otherwise.
I just dont like this. I think it sounds like Pom is trying to explain the thought process behind cooking up a claim rather than trying to defend his own claim. But im too tired to count votes and see what mine would do.Pomegranate wrote:But then when I'd flip scum you'd suspect them more. And if I was tracked, I'd be proven scum. There are much more convenient and less obscure fakeclaims for me.Espeonage wrote:You can go around declaring that your buddies are town when you survive the night and it just too perfect.
You are kidding me right? So you don't believe me? Then provide a post where you actually said anything about me today before your vote?curiouskarmadog wrote:then I dont think you really iso-ed me then...just because I didnt type your name out doesnt mean I didnt quote something you said and then say "I liked you before this statement"....Sando wrote:I just did an ISO of you, and using the 'ctrl-f' function, you literally haven't used my name today until you voted me.curiouskarmadog wrote:Need to catch up, I find it funny that Sando seems to have no clue why I am voting him…I haven’t posted that much in the game…is it that hard to figure out?
at any rate, lets go down that bullshit hole...lets say I didnt say ANYTHING about your before voting you......
...so? What is your point? I cant find you scummy whenever I want? I have to build up to it?
If you read my post when I voted you, you should know why I am voting you...I dont think you are really reading the game (ie following closely to scum hunt).....on top of that, I dont like some of the crap your pushing (overreacting is scummy)..
So you refer to Sera talking about Pomcuriouskarmadog wrote:I agree somewhat...but if she is telling the truth, a.) she will be offed..b.) it will provide a ton of information.Seraphim wrote:There seems to be absolutely no point to this role besides "confirming" town which is strangely convenient.Pomegranate wrote:K, rechecked my Role PM.
Weak Mode:
-I die if the person I hide with is targeted with a kill.
-I die if I hide with scum. This therefore confirms farside, because I hid with her last night.
-I die if I'm targeted with a kill.
Not to mention Hider is a favorite scum fakeclaim.
Can someone lynch this lying scum?
That being said, the “hider” part of that role doesn’t make any since in weak mode….
farside, can you tell me why this isnt a good idea? Using a claim hider to test for scum.farside22 wrote:She could hide behind one of 4 people we think are scummy. She dies and they don't boom we have instant scum.
That's if you believe her claim. I'm sitting on the fence on it. She never responded to my post with my reason's either which bothers me as well.
you are assuming a lot here....Faraday wrote: What if she was to go into strong mode - and we have her hide behind someone. Under the assumption she's not scum the scum can't kill her as her role could be re-directed to one of them. Rit? That's assuming I understand her role correct.
did you crumb this in any way?Pomegranate wrote:I hid behind you because I had a town read on you, and I didn't want to hide with scum.farside22 wrote:
Why did you "hide" behind me? So the only down fall if you are weak is if your targeted you will die?
I am fine with getting more information....scum wont want to let a hider who can confirm townies alive very long. I am not for her telling us who she hides behind before she does it..most likely pom, this is just an extension on a lynch....for you to contirubte to the game. I am fine with postponing your lynch for a few days to let you prove your worth and maybe actually get some decent info. But your information is useless until we know your alignment.
Also,
Unvote, vote Sando.
Sando, did you kill our vig?
curiouskarmadog, would you mind getting back to this?curiouskarmadog, Post 694 wrote:I will, but you dont have any thoughts?Javert wrote:
3.)Please fill in your own blanks.curiouskarmadog, Post 677 wrote:this is a lame post....can anyone explain why (hint: I can think of 3 reasons). Also it has nothing to do with his current vote.Papa Zito wrote: I'm inherently suspicious of the <20 post crowd.
So I wasn't even in your top 7? Nice one CKD... Yet I should 'know' the case on you...curiouskarmadog in 972 wrote:and Nickcuriouskarmadog wrote:oh and add Jahudo.curiouskarmadog wrote:interesting, I agree with this list from ABR...I agree with Pom, Esp, and Bob on this list...I think Sera is town. Richard, is just the VI..catching up, then I will probably be voting Pom.Albert B. Rampage wrote:My scumlist:
Pomegranate
Espeonage
Seraphim
bobberz
Richard