Catching up from about page 11, got some time…
Cobalt wrote:
stop being bad at this game
this coming from cobalt is a fucking joke
Jack wrote:Content is such a buzzword.
Cobalt isn't particularly playing different from the game I saw him as town in.
giving him a cookie from bad play?..have you ever seen him as scum?..if not, why bring this up? Also, content isnt a buzzword.
xvart wrote:I would be interested in running up another wagon and see if Budja jumps on it, too.
interesting statement...this REALLY is sticking out to me. At this point post (289) Jack has 4 votes. Cobalt just has 2. You express suspicion on Jack in the post with an FOS, but you vote cobalt instead? So why not vote Jack to "run up a wagon" and see if Bud jumps on it?
Jack wrote:
CKD abandoned her third post of the day and only serious case with a weaksauce "I've been back and forth on Jack...that last vote though...". I think in Jack's opinion the vote is fairly obvious given the context of the discussion the previous day. CKD, what made you go back and forth previously?
your play in general...I have seen you being unhelpful before, but your last vote (before I voted you) was pathetic. to me, it seems like you are going out of your way to scum hunt. also, I would like to see pressure on you..see what happens. I likes your vagon zee best.
Papa Zito wrote:
I can easily see CKD as being opportunistic.
how so? You don’t like wagons? Why? You feel like your vote on Meh is(was) doing something?
farside22 wrote:
ckd
post 188 why are you voting for elscouta here?
the quote you posted explains it dear. I didnt like his attack of a bandwagon on day 1....it seems like an attempt to look town. wagons on day 1 are great...I would love to argue theory with anyone who disagrees. that being said, i dont like wagons based on jack (thinks there is a pun here). Even on day 1..there should be reasons people want to apply pressure to someone.
Cobalt wrote:still see no reason to unvote cyberbob
jack is appealing though
why?
Jack wrote:Ooh, I really don't like xvart now. That post is terrible. Maybe I should do something more useful with my vote.
unvote, vote:xvart
first thing jack has said that I actually agree with (in reference to 363). jack what about that post did you find "terrible" I am curious.