Jack ~ L-4 (Zachrulez, Cobalt, Locke Lamora)
hohum ~ L-5 (Percy, ekiM)
Not Voting: hohum
Again, someone defends hohum and answers the case against him in a favourable manner. Only after the lack of evidence to back up his read is presented to him by ekiM does he think to actually ask hohum.Locke Lamora 480 wrote:Percy: flinter replacing out is nothing like Reckoner threatening to replace out. Did flinter 'go all emo'? As I understood it, hohum's point was that Reck was going into a sulk and giving up. I didn't see the same from flinter.
Are you saying it is?Locke Lamora 485 wrote:I'm not saying flinter replacing out isn't scummy
This post just seems like it's out in left field with all the other reasons to have voted for Jack's player slot at the time.ortolan wrote:kyle got mislynched on day one in roccisi winter as town doc (along with a whole bunch of other policy lynches), mainly for lurking and being noncommittal if memory serves. I don't see the difference to how he is playing here. flinter's case is basically "kyle usually plays like a sheep and because he's not doing so here he is likely to be scum". Sure it's uncharitable but I also can't shake the feeling flinter is just coming up with a convoluted excuse to vote someone who she thinks is an easy target (and conveniently avoid more populous/viable bandwagons).
Unvote
Vote: flinter
Locke Lamora 368 wrote:Vi, although that lynch would never happen at this stage, is increasingly pinging my scumdar; I particularly don't like his recent vote on ortolan which is in clear contrast to his call for bigger wagons and I feel it's too close to deadline for a major change of direction.
Locke Lamora 437 wrote:I also really don't see the ortolan case. I agree with his earlier point about Reckoner's style as town and I don't think he's been lurking a great deal either. His frustration reads as annoyed townie to me.
Locke Lamora 447 wrote:Vi: because that's exactly what I thought about Reckoner. When I played with town-Reck, he never expressed a desire to give up despite being wagoned to claiming on D1. His 'lynch me' post was a clear departure from that and I immediately thought exactly what ortolan did.
Gotta scoot for now, hopefully back on again this evening.Locke Lamora 485 wrote:I'm interested in lynches on Jack, Reckoner and Vi.
Vi: you suggested that ortolan going after the VIs was scummy; on the same grounds, what do you make of ekiM's early post where he listed kyle, Reck and myself in his scummy category?
ekiM wrote:
Goodies
ortolan- mostly gut. Reads as genuine. Would like more posting.
Percy- Again what he's saying feels honest.
sotty7- Gut...
Zach- And again. Yeah I guess I can't explain these reads yet.
ekiM wrote: hohum, ortolan, DDD. These guys trouble me. They've all been less involved than I expected. They've all been chasing the easy targets (hypocrisy, I know).
ortolan again with the lurking and chasing xRx/flint. I like his interactions with kyle though. Inscrutable man.
I will support a hohum or DDD lynch today.
ekiM wrote:Scum are hohum, Locke, and one other. DDD? Sotty? Hrm.
ekiM wrote:No reason ort can't be scum, but it's less likely to be with hohum when he named his two lynch preferences for today as Jack/flint and hohum. I'm pretty sold on hohum being scum.
ISO 18 you talk about most of the people in the game but skip orto.ekiM wrote:Looking again at ortolan, his lurking and going after the VIs a lot still look bad. His meltdown towards Vi is still baffling. I don't know what more there is to say.
Post 137, five days into the game. So what?Jack wrote:ekiM wrote:Goodies
ortolan- mostly gut. Reads as genuine. Would like more posting.
Percy- Again what he's saying feels honest.
sotty7- Gut...
Zach- And again. Yeah I guess I can't explain these reads yet.
I thought ortoscum+hoscum unlikely. I thought ortolan was scummy. I thought hohum was scummier. So did you, for a time.Jack wrote:ekiM wrote:hohum, ortolan, DDD. These guys trouble me. They've all been less involved than I expected. They've all been chasing the easy targets (hypocrisy, I know).
ortolan again with the lurking and chasing xRx/flint. I like his interactions with kyle though. Inscrutable man.
I will support a hohum or DDD lynch today.ekiM wrote:Scum are hohum, Locke, and one other. DDD? Sotty? Hrm.ekiM wrote:No reason ort can't be scum, but it's less likely to be with hohum when he named his two lynch preferences for today as Jack/flint and hohum. I'm pretty sold on hohum being scum.ekiM wrote:Looking again at ortolan, his lurking and going after the VIs a lot still look bad. His meltdown towards Vi is still baffling. I don't know what more there is to say.
Iso 18 I talk about people under suspicion. Iso 19, six hours later, I re-assess the game and comment on everyone, listing ortolan as one of the scummy players.Jack wrote:ISO 18 you talk about most of the people in the game but skip orto.
I called ortolan as suspect before the wagon even started. I thought hohum was a better lynch. If you have specific questions about my thought process, ask.Jack wrote:Basically, how can you call Locke's defense of orto scummier than your "supporting but not really" of the orto lynch? The best defense is a good offense, don't your lengthy attacks on hohum qualify?
ortolan 271 wrote:It's just so hard to choose between hohum and Jack.
makes it less likely. Hope he's active soon.ortolan 309 wrote:My preference is to lynch either Jack or hohum today. I could vote for either, and could see them both being scum.
Eh? In 475 Jack places the third vote on ortolan (more like fourth, but Jahudo didn't unvote in 457). That was the last thing he did yesterday.xRECKONERx 544 wrote:FoS: Jackfor jumping ship to the hohum wagon once the ort wagon was picking up steam.