Open 213 -- Mini Love (Over)

Looker · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:38 pm

I'm here

Looker · Post Post #13 (isolation #1) » Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:12 am

Preferably this one

Looker · Post Post #23 (isolation #2) » Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:58 pm

vote easjo

Why don't you tell your scumpartner Riley to take my avatar before I shove it down his throat?

Looker · Post Post #113 (isolation #3) » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:58 pm

Currently catching up

Looker · Post Post #115 (isolation #4) » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:17 pm

DoItRiley's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2203952#2203952]Post 37[/url] wrote:Yeah okay how about we just not mass claim, sound good?

I agree.

DoItRiley's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2204619#2204619]Post 53[/url] wrote:
Nikanor wrote:Yeah,
if
we lynch scum. I'd rather just go for the other scum. Having the town lovers alive can be a huge asset, since they're practically masons once the scum lover dies.
I completely agree with this.

I agree.

DoItRiley's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2204698#2204698]Post 57[/url] wrote:Oh and for anyone who hasn't really been posting anything...a.k.a. Looker, Henry, ksen, Chrono, and easjo...don't come in here being idiotic and jokey/RVS stage junk because there's actual been some serious discussion going on and we don't need any momentum killers bullshitting around.

I disagree. There's nothing scummy yet, just disagreements and debates.

Yankee: If you hadn't have claimed, I would've proposed claiming only at L-1 like we did last game. Don't know if what you're doing is a gambit or not, though.

DoItRiley's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2205707#2205707]Post 100[/url] wrote:
Yankee wrote:I am very suspicious of you at the moment DoItRiley for your very last sentence. You seem like you are trying to overstate your opinion of the matter, even after there is no reason to state your opinion because the decision is made. I dont see why you would do this unless you are trying to act town on purpose.
No I just think it's bullshit that you decided to take the decision on your own back and act without thinking of what the majority wants to happen. And it pisses me off because I think this path is a worse path than the other (now defunct) option.

I really did not want my first game on this account to be a loss.

I agree.

Looker · Post Post #116 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:18 pm

@Yankee: Why'd you claim?

Looker · Post Post #140 (isolation #6) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:00 pm

DarkLight: Was there anything you wanted me to reply to or speak on in particular?

DoItRiley's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2206589#2206589]Post 135[/url] wrote:I have a lot to say but I'm going to go tan so I'll post after I get back inside. But for the record, I'm not hohum or SensFan. Ironically neither of those two and I got along well. I spoke out against them multiple times.

Hmm...what's the last game you played on your main account?

Looker · Post Post #154 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 05, 2010 8:36 pm

Democracy didn't work, so let's try this the Republican way. I elect DoItRiley to decide how we're going to do this. Who should we lynch, Riley?

Looker · Post Post #190 (isolation #8) » Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:46 am

Sorry, homework took extra long today. I'll be back to post after work.

Looker · Post Post #217 (isolation #9) » Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:48 pm

MOD: I'm dying here (too much homework); can I get replaced?