The non-hohum people against a hohum lynch:
I could easily see two of those being scumbuddies trying to steer away. I'm gung-ho for a hohum lynch now.
Well I suppose I will put the lynching vote on him if he was run up and my vote was needed. I just don't agree with the bulk of the case andekiM Post 397 wrote:Huh? Did I say the problem is "he hasn't been forthcoming"? No, I didn't. Just like I didn't say the problem was he's abrasive. Again, you try to pretend the hohum case is about something that it isn't, something weaker...
Your wild speculation that Percy is voting out of pique is so irrelevant. Why do you focus on that early exchange so much.
You agree with Jack's point about the final vote and it taking long. What do you think about him ignoring flinter, his suspect, replacing out? Why do you ignore that point.
I can't understand your line of thinking. You agree with or ignore the strongest points against hohum, yet you won't consider lynching him today. Hrm.
He didn't say his vote was final in 209. It came two days later in response to Vi, who asked him if his vote was "locked on".ekiM wrote:OK... and what about the strongest points against him? The way he declared his xRx vote final for threatening to replace out, what do you think about that. The way he didn't make that final vote for an hour and felt the need to provide a link to back it up. The way he completely ignored his other suspect flinter replacing out, while throwing the book at Rec for threatening it.
I don't remember if he's done it before. I was commenting on the irony of him saying his vote was locked before going on V/LA.Jahudo 406 wrote:@Vi: Did you elaborate on the "locked on" thing? Is that something hohum has done before? (I can't remember if it was in bebop or another game I should know about)
Nice...Jack wrote:ortolan wrote:didn't want to prejudice his responses, br0. Of course now you're going to need to meta his replacement anyway.Vi wrote:I would like to see your response to Vi's 284 and 287.ortolan 288 wrote:I just isoed kyle, the only scummy thing I noticed is
Which is kind of a weird thing to say. I would like to see kyle's response to Vi's 284 though.kyle ISO 6 (to ekiM) wrote:You make some decent points on me,
Unvotefor what looks like tactical replacement.
Vote: kylefos:ortolan
kyle replaced out of another game with the same message...don't like your reaction.
You're basically wrong, and this argument is stupid.Jack 410 wrote:-Your vote is doing jack, VI~Vi wrote:Your vote wasn't on anyone. Mine's on scum. tyvmJack 408 wrote:And you were lecturing me about my vote being somewhere that wasn't "helpful".
You're nothelpinganyone and it's lending nocredenceto your dedication.-
About 4 going by ekiM's list, compared to about 7 for hohum, who I like a bit better. And deadline is in like 12 hours. You're voting for no lynch right now. Not that I object since you'll change your vote before hand, but that's what you get for lecturing me earlierVi wrote:You're basically wrong, and this argument is stupid.Jack 410 wrote:-Your vote is doing jack, VI~Vi wrote:Your vote wasn't on anyone. Mine's on scum. tyvmJack 408 wrote:And you were lecturing me about my vote being somewhere that wasn't "helpful".
You're nothelpinganyone and it's lending nocredenceto your dedication.-
Why don't you want to lynch ortolan? There are plenty of people who have voiced interest in lynching him.
Yes I was, I replaced out when you bitched about being in the same game as me (mainly because I called you out as scum, and despite the fact you actually replaced into a game which I was already in for some reason).Vi (3178) wrote:ortolan wasn't in Death Note Mafia.
So let me get this straight.ortolan 420 wrote:can someone explain to me why it's so hard to get Vi lynched when he's obv-scum? Do you think maybe he's capable of faking his "protown" play considering he never gets lynched and I'm apparently the only one who can consistently read him (although he usually calls the mod in to try to get me out of the game when that's the case anyway)
ortolanLocke Lamora 417 wrote:I can't say I'm particularly enthusiastic about any of these wagons. I'm going to read back and decide where best to place my vote as the Reck wagon is clearly not happening.
I don't think that happened. When did hohum go on V/LA, and when did he say his vote was locked on? All I can find is you asking if his vote was "locked on", and he said yes.Vi wrote:I don't remember if he's done it before. I was commenting on the irony of him saying his vote was locked before going on V/LA.Jahudo 406 wrote:@Vi: Did you elaborate on the "locked on" thing? Is that something hohum has done before? (I can't remember if it was in bebop or another game I should know about)
I agree that I'm bothered by how he called his vote final well before the deadlinewhile still listing two other suspects. That IMO is the strongest point against him.