ZOMBIES! - Zombies take over for the win!!!


User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1400 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:31 am

Post by ODDin »

Starbuck, evilsnail either made a typo or meant "on N2 I doscovered that reck targeted kmd". His post really makes no sense otherwise - read the context, he says that he didn't push to lynch reck D2 because he didn't know his info yet, not because the info was about N2 to begin with.
You're seriously reaching.

Even if he's lying, this isn't evidence to that.
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1401 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:19 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

iLord wrote:What ABR said actually makes a lot of sense. I'm not sure why I've never thought about doing this before.

ABR, at what point do you think we should get around to lynching one of the two?
Tomorrow IMO. One of evilsnail and Reck will find out more information, or one will die and we lynch the other.
ODDin wrote:As for ABR's plan, it has pluses and minuses. The sooner we know who is scum, the sooner we can draw conclusions from it to find the rest of the scumteam. As long as we're pursuing the "one of them is scum but we don't know who" avenue of thinking, we can't really try to discern what it means.
Yes, this is true. But we should consider that there's always individually scummy people in the game.
animorpherv1 wrote:I don't like it either. Scum will claim blocked, or an inno result on scum/guilty on town.
Yeah and the town one will have valid info. Reck, why would you target bv anyway??
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
xRECKONERx
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
User avatar
User avatar
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
GD is my Best Man
Posts: 26087
Joined: March 15, 2009

Post Post #1402 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:20 am

Post by xRECKONERx »

CryMeARiver wrote:1) @ Evilsnail: If it doesn't go without saying, I would not say whom you targeted last night as it may result in something bad (a NK) happening.
2) With the death of a deputy, it's mighty convenient for xReckx to claim cop. It would be a safe claim for mafia because there is a 100% chance of a cop in this setup now and because it would out the real cop for mafia to later kill. If xReckx is lying, I am curious as to what you would think of the real cop counterclaiming xReckx. And while it may sound like a softclaim, I am indeed not a cop. :)
There won't be a counterclaim,
because I am the fucking cop
.

@Starbuck: Yeah, let's just say I ran into some problems this weekend (drama drama drama bawww) so I didn't really have time to put together a case. In any case, I think we have more pressing matters at the moment.
green shirt thursdays
User avatar
xRECKONERx
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
User avatar
User avatar
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
GD is my Best Man
Posts: 26087
Joined: March 15, 2009

Post Post #1403 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:22 am

Post by xRECKONERx »

@ABR: when I have an investigative role and no really strong scum reads on anyone, I target the most neutral players that I can.
green shirt thursdays
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Albert B. Rampage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 27261
Joined: April 8, 2007
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico

Post Post #1404 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:24 am

Post by Albert B. Rampage »

evilsnail wrote:Reck's anger seems genuine to me. I'm not convinced by the case on him.
Evilsnail, when did you change your mind about Reckoner?
Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.
User avatar
iLord
iLord
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
iLord
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1646
Joined: July 31, 2008

Post Post #1405 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:34 am

Post by iLord »

ABR wrote:Tomorrow IMO. One of evilsnail and Reck will find out more information, or one will die and we lynch the other.
Yeah, in that case, the disadvantage is negligible and the extra result is nothing to scoff at. I'm fine with finding someone else to lynch then. Dunno who though, but I don't think we should lynch bv or ODDin.
User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1406 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:34 am

Post by ODDin »

xRECKONERx wrote:@ABR: when I have an investigative role and no really strong scum reads on anyone, I target the most neutral players that I can.
So bv was the most neutral player D1? I remember at least I've been accusing him already then.
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
User avatar
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
Massclaim_is_Good
Posts: 1346
Joined: December 21, 2003
Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh

Post Post #1407 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:46 am

Post by Pie_is_good »

Alternate theory: EvilSnail is a recruit attempting to suicide-bomb Reck. This will buy the overlords 2 nights' worth of recruiting so it's clearly worthwhile.

If this is true, we shouldn't lynch either one. Killing recruits is too slow.

In order for this to be true, someone else would need to account for the two nightkills. Perhaps a vig, if present, should do so?
I am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.
User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1408 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:54 am

Post by ODDin »

Unfortunately, there will be too much WIFOM going around if we just let both reck and evil live. ABR's plan of waiting until tomorrow might make sense, but by the onset of N4 one of them must die, one way or the other.

Also, there isn't necessarily a vig. There's the option that:
1) kmd was actually killed by the cult, so there's only one recruit.
2) yos was killed because he protected the wrong person (bodyguards and docs who die when protecting scum aren't too uncommon, I believe).
User avatar
wolframnhart
wolframnhart
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
wolframnhart
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2608
Joined: July 1, 2008
Location: California

Post Post #1409 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:59 pm

Post by wolframnhart »

unvote bv310


So much back and forth I missed while at work.
Way I see it:
1)Evil is lying because he all of a sudden got a result on Reck and has started in on him. I can easily see this as Evil had gotten recruited last night, and is trying to get Reck killed. In this instance if/when Reck flips town, zombies recruit another person next night, and Evil is lynched next day, saving one of or the Zombie Lord since he/they are the ones that need to be killed to end the game. KMD being a bodyguard could have protected a cult member and died from it ( i believe that is how bodyguard works yes?) so to say Reck "targetted" KMD is convenient for Evil to use against him.

2)Reck is scum and is trying to throw people off track and get Evil lynched, saving himself for another day, cult does not have to try and kill Evil who would be protected if possible because Recks flip of scum would prove him and Evil is free to watch others. Again KMD could have protected a cult member and died from that instead of being killed by cult, though it would take a confirmation of lynching either Reck or Evil to prove that I think.

Question is where to go from here. I am taking the family to Disneyland tomorrow so won't be posting till later, but will think on this and post up again when we get home, if not then very early next day.
They tell you never hit a man with a closed fist, but it is on occasion hilarious. - Malcolm Reynolds

Wolf, I fucking hate your face, but still <3 you as a whole. - Starbuck
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
User avatar
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
Massclaim_is_Good
Posts: 1346
Joined: December 21, 2003
Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh

Post Post #1410 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:20 pm

Post by Pie_is_good »

Vote: Reck


Eh. There are certainly plausible scenarios where ES is gambitting, but whichever way you cut it, nobody is more likely to be an overlord right now. I'm willing to risk a coplynch for that.
I am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.
User avatar
xRECKONERx
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
User avatar
User avatar
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
GD is my Best Man
Posts: 26087
Joined: March 15, 2009

Post Post #1411 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:29 pm

Post by xRECKONERx »

How about this...

No lynch today? Let me and ES have another chance to get results, then report back tomorrow and decide?

Or we can lynch someone who's NOT me/ES/ODD/bv.
green shirt thursdays
User avatar
MrSuave
MrSuave
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MrSuave
Goon
Goon
Posts: 803
Joined: June 22, 2009

Post Post #1412 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:59 pm

Post by MrSuave »

how about we not no lynch. that's a bad idea. at least lynches give us info. even if we get it wrong, it's still bad to no lynch. that is a bad thing.
Vote: Reck
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
User avatar
User avatar
Pie_is_good
Massclaim_is_Good
Massclaim_is_Good
Posts: 1346
Joined: December 21, 2003
Location: under your umbrella ella ella eh eh eh

Post Post #1413 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:01 pm

Post by Pie_is_good »

No Lynch is indeed a terrible idea. I'll entertain the idea of lynching someone who's neither Reck nor ES, but not no lynch at all.
I am a stand-up dude of genuine flyness.
User avatar
Starbuck
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7324
Joined: April 24, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post Post #1414 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:12 pm

Post by Starbuck »

I also believe that no lynch is a bad idea, but I do like ABR's plan of not killing either one of them.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
User avatar
Starbuck
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7324
Joined: April 24, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post Post #1415 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:12 pm

Post by Starbuck »

Right now, all we have is what evil said and what Reck said.


Neither one is confirmed.
This is something that needs to be remembered.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
User avatar
evilsnail
evilsnail
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
evilsnail
Goon
Goon
Posts: 539
Joined: January 23, 2010
Location: Netherlands

Post Post #1416 (ISO) » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:29 pm

Post by evilsnail »

As several people have pointed out, it was a typo. I found out last night that xReck targetted KMD Night 1. My ability allows me to determine who someone targetted the night before.

Also, xReck is definitely not the town cop. Just the readiness with which he claimed should tell you that.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:
evilsnail wrote:Reck's anger seems genuine to me. I'm not convinced by the case on him.
Evilsnail, when did you change your mind about Reckoner?
I think it was Night 1. Might have already been later that day. I played a game with him in which he was town recently and he's just not contributing nearly as much as then. Also, I didn't like the vote he came out Day 2.

By the end of Day 2, xReck was one of my top suspects.
evilsnail wrote:Who I believe is the scummiest player? Well, my top suspects for scum are you and xReck. I also don't like bv310's opportunism and lack of contribution (plus, he's my nemesis).
User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1417 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:01 am

Post by ODDin »

wolf: yos was the bodyguard, kmd was the deputy.

No lynch is obviously a bad idea. Interesting that reck brings up the idea of lynching neither himself nor evil as if it were his own idea, and not ABR's idea, which had already been discussed a lot by the time he posted 1411.
User avatar
Starbuck
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7324
Joined: April 24, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post Post #1418 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:10 am

Post by Starbuck »

I really don't feel that Reck was bringing it up as his own idea. I feel you are reaching with this point.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1419 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:19 am

Post by ODDin »

I didn't say I was completely certain, but the "how about this" part sounds as if he's bringing it up as his own idea. You say "how about this" about something you expect people to not have considered before.
User avatar
ODDin
ODDin
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ODDin
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1209
Joined: March 8, 2009
Location: Haifa, Israel

Post Post #1420 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:20 am

Post by ODDin »

By the way, your defense of reck and valiant attempts to get evil lynched are noticed.
User avatar
Starbuck
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7324
Joined: April 24, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post Post #1421 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:57 am

Post by Starbuck »

Hold the phone, am I even voting for evil?


OH LOOK.......








I'M NOT.


Obviously, you missed my Post 1414.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
User avatar
Starbuck
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Starbuck
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7324
Joined: April 24, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post Post #1422 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:58 am

Post by Starbuck »

I also never said that Reck wasn't scummy.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
User avatar
elvis_knits
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
User avatar
User avatar
elvis_knits
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Queen of Rock'n'Purl
Posts: 8610
Joined: October 13, 2005
Location: Puppytown

Post Post #1423 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:41 am

Post by elvis_knits »

I believe Evilsnail. If this is a gambit then he's dying next. Scum don't usually do the 1-for-1, so I doubt evilsnail is gambitting.

Also, kmd flipped deputy, iirc. Evilsnail claiming sheriff fits with that flavor. Cop doesn't. And Reck claimed cop. Also, worst case scenario if reck is actually the cop is we get two confirmed town in bv and oddin.

unvote; vote reckoner
Talk nerdy to me.

"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell
User avatar
xRECKONERx
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
User avatar
User avatar
xRECKONERx
GD is my Best Man
GD is my Best Man
Posts: 26087
Joined: March 15, 2009

Post Post #1424 (ISO) » Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:16 am

Post by xRECKONERx »

You guys are FUCKING RETARDED.

STOP FUCKING LYNCHING A TOWN POWER ROLE WHEN WE'VE ALREADY LOST TWO OTHERS.

People We Should Lynch From1. Wolframnhart
2. CryMeARiver
6. animorpherv1
7. MrSuave
8. CooLDoG
9. Starbuck
11. elvis_knits
13. Nobody Special
14. Pie_is_good
15. Albert B. Rampage
17. iLord


Seriously? I didn't know who else to say, I thought no lynching might work out since then we WOULD NOT have a mislynch AND we'd get another night of results. But if nobody wants to No Lynch, can we at least look at this list and figure out someone else, because lynching me when I'm the fucking Cop is fucking stupid.

PS, sheriff as a role who can tell who people targeted the previous night makes even less sense than a deputy backing up a cop. Stop using flavor to distinguish this.
green shirt thursdays

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”