"What's your name?"
"Andrew,"
"Okay, Andrew,"
Jack ~ L-4 (Zachrulez, Jahudo, Sotty7)
hohum ~ L-5 (Percy, Jack)
Sotty7 ~ L-5 (xRECKONERx, Locke Lamora)
Jahudo ~ L-5 (Vi, ortolan)
Not Voting:
When was this?xRECKONERx 29 wrote:@ekiM: I'm not straight edge. Not by a long shot. lrn2GDkyle99 wrote:vote: xReck
Always up for voting him
Re: kyle99 - he wants to lynch me despite the fact thatI've lead wagons on him as scum more timesthan I have as town.
Unvote; Vote: Kyle99
Mayor Mafia, you mean the one where you were killed N2 and kyle99 was lynched D3? Meaning he saw you as scum in that game and most certainly knew you were scume, contradicting kyle #2.xRECKONERx wrote:I think it was Mayor Mafia and one other one that I can't seem to remember right now. It's on my wiki page.
Fixed to what that word was absolutely supposed to be.~Vi 305 wrote:Mayor Mafia, you mean the one where you were killed N2 and kyle99 was lynched D3? Meaning he saw you as scum in that game and most certainly knew you werescumé, contradicting kyle #2.
...yet votes for someone without any votes on them two days later, four days before deadline. Also, the admonishment comes just after I first posted my case on hohum, and I thought it smelt a little like a chainsaw behind "Pro-Town Advice". I've already noted the interaction between hohum and Vi, and this isn't making me feel any better.Vi 212 wrote:"Town Fragmented And Useless; Petition Signed For Fewer, Larger Bandwagons", end quote.
sorry, I was not aware of this. Is he still in any other games as of now? What do you find scummy about my reaction?Jack wrote:ortolan wrote:didn't want to prejudice his responses, br0. Of course now you're going to need to meta his replacement anyway.Vi wrote:I would like to see your response to Vi's 284 and 287.ortolan 288 wrote:I just isoed kyle, the only scummy thing I noticed is
Which is kind of a weird thing to say. I would like to see kyle's response to Vi's 284 though.kyle ISO 6 (to ekiM) wrote:You make some decent points on me,
Unvotefor what looks like tactical replacement.
Vote: kylefos:ortolan
kyle replaced out of another game with the same message...don't like your reaction.
So why doesn't this apply to your kyle vote? Or your Jack vote?ortolan wrote:I also can't shake the feeling flinter is just coming up with a convoluted excuse to vote someone who she thinks is an easy target (and conveniently avoid more populous/viable bandwagons).
Not quite sure what you're asking here. I voted kyle because I believed him at the time to be seeking tactical replacement (which I must admit I myself tried to do in a recent ongoing game as scum. I wasn't able to replace out and got lynched). I was too lazy to exhaustively check if he'd replaced out of every game he's in, which I'm still wondering about (although now I've found out there's a tool that lets you look up user's posts even while post search is ostensibly disabled). I am still waiting for Vi (or someone else) to offer some meta on kyle, because I know Jahudo is frustratingly difficult to read if he is scum.Percy (310) wrote:So why doesn't this apply to your kyle vote? Or your Jack vote?
At the time I said that, there were a lot of two-person and one-person bandwagons and everyone was split up doing their own thing, and I felt nothing was getting done. However, I thought I had come across a legitimate lie from kyle99, plus the wagon was directly tied to xRx (who had the largest bandwagon at the time), plus ekiM's support. In other words, it was a new bandwagon that had potential.Percy 308 wrote:I think it's strange that Vi admonished the town thusly:...yet votes for someone without any votes on them two days later, four days before deadline. Also, the admonishment comes just after I first posted my case on hohum, and I thought it smelt a little like a chainsaw behind "Pro-Town Advice". I've already noted the interaction between hohum and Vi, and this isn't making me feel any better.Vi 212 wrote:"Town Fragmented And Useless; Petition Signed For Fewer, Larger Bandwagons", end quote.FoS: Vi
It is pretty funny really. Zach and myself are married and on top of that have played a ton of mafia games with each other so we're going to be linked. We have a lot of meta to work with and right now I just feel Zachtown. Doesn't mean I'm not going to push him, but it does mean I am going to call out BS attacks when I see them. flinter's was a prime example of a complete tosh case.Vi Post 262 wrote:It's kind of hilarious that people are linking Sotty and Zach, unless I have the mafiascum family tree wrong. [/offtopic]
She posted that she had issues with school. You're reaching.Zachrulez wrote:FTR, That other game Flinter is in she has not yet replaced out in, and actually posted there after replacing out here.
Which is just further fueling my suspicion that she just couldn't take the heat.
Yeah, but she posted to stay in that game here. In this game, she never bothered to give a reason why she replaced out. She was into the game defending herself one minute, and then the next, she just wanted out... and she was MORE into this game than she seems to be in the other one, so the progression from that to replacing out just doesn't make any sense to me.Sotty7 wrote:She posted that she had issues with school. You're reaching.Zachrulez wrote:FTR, That other game Flinter is in she has not yet replaced out in, and actually posted there after replacing out here.
Which is just further fueling my suspicion that she just couldn't take the heat.
I also see a Vi wall I need to read.
Which is a funny thing for you to say, because you generally tend to post something like this when you are scum to keep the door for Zachscum open just a crack. When you're town, you generally don't cast this kind of doubt on your reads of me.Sotty7 wrote:
Of course abuse of meta and all that, hecouldbe playing me, but I don't think so.
That was a counter to someone who was bound to say "Zach could be abusing his meta"Zachrulez Post 321 wrote:Which is a funny thing for you to say, because you generally tend to post something like this when you are scum to keep the door for Zachscum open just a crack. When you're town, you generally don't cast this kind of doubt on your reads of me.Sotty7 wrote:
Of course abuse of meta and all that, hecouldbe playing me, but I don't think so.
Also, I can count on a hand with exactly 0 fingers the number of times I have actually been able to successfully play you as scum.
On the other side of the coin, the number of times you have played me as scum... well, the number's a lot higher than 0.