Mini 937 - Mafia on Death Row OVER
-
-
GreenDude Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 283
- Joined: June 4, 2009
I read through easjo and I if you would like I will show what certain posts drawed my attention.
With only 2 days or so we have to decide who to lynch. And PEG or wolframhart are about to be lynched. I wouldn't say it's a convenient target, it's a bandwagon like the mafiassk one. And I feel I need to decide between them.Violence is not the answer. It is a question, and my answer is yes!-
-
GreenDude Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 283
- Joined: June 4, 2009
-
-
GreenDude Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 283
- Joined: June 4, 2009
-
-
Super Awesome Mega Zord! Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: February 15, 2010
I know you're asking GD not me, but I feel compelled to give my answer as well.MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Hmm ... did you bother to look at PEG, wolframhart or any of the others of us with lower activity? Seems like easjo is just a convienant target since others (mostly Deathsauce) have been hitting that drum for awhile.GreenDude wrote:I've just been reading easjo and it seems that he hasn't posted much at all. And not written more than 3 lines.
I think that mafiassk can be perceived in one way to be scummy but if you look at it a different way, there is logical explanations. So I would rathervote:easyjo
First of all, there's a difference between lower activity and lurking. The former is what happens when that annoying world full of oxygen impedes our imperative duty to post and has little bearing on one's alignment, the latter is a scummy strategy wherein dodging suspicion takes precedence over other goals. The important difference is that a player who simply posts infrequently is nevertheless capable of giving off tells, while a lurker minimizes that risk. SSK and wolf are the former, easjo and PEG are the latter. On that note, if there was a wagon on PEG I'd lynch him over easjo.
Secondly, yes she's convenient, but now's not exactly the best time to go after inconvenient targets. We got three days to decide on a lynch, so if you're gonna lead the charge on someone right now, you better have a hell of a case backing you up. Unless of course you're trying to be useless by keeping your vote on a player who clearly won't be lynched. Isn't that right PEG?
Thirdly, when you say "others (mostly Deathsauce)", who exactly are theotherothers?8-) You can call me Mad Cool Ballin' King! for short. 8-)-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
So,GreenDude wrote:I've just been reading easjo and it seems that he hasn't posted much at all. And not written more than 3 lines.
I think that mafiassk can be perceived in one way to be scummy but if you look at it a different way, there is logical explanations. So I would rathervote:easyjo
1) a lurkervote (while ignoring peg and others (like magna said))
2) fence sittingEek!-
-
Damon_Gant Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 436
- Joined: January 21, 2010
Yeah, what SAMP said with regards to convenience. There's no point going all out for a lynch that will not happen now. Any attempt to lynch PEG at this point is not likely to have enough steam to result in a lynch in the 2 days.MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Hmm ... did you bother to look at PEG, wolframhart or any of the others of us with lower activity? Seems like easjo is just a convienant target since others (mostly Deathsauce) have been hitting that drum for awhile.GreenDude wrote:I've just been reading easjo and it seems that he hasn't posted much at all. And not written more than 3 lines.
I think that mafiassk can be perceived in one way to be scummy but if you look at it a different way, there is logical explanations. So I would rathervote:easyjo
Easjo also happens to be a new level of suspicious compared to the other lurkers as well, as she is lurking and being very anti-town whenever she does post. If an easjo wagon looks like the only way to get a lynch before deadline then I will join.Swimming, anyone?
Call me Gant-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
Vote Count A001399
MafiaSSK (4) [Damon_Gant, wolframnhart, MagnaofIllusion, Zodiark13]
easjo682 (3) [DeathSauce, Super Awesome Mega Pimp!, Greendude]
Zodiark13 (2) [My Milked Eek, Nachomamma8]
GreenDude (1) [pickemgenius]
Damon_Gant (1) [MafiaSSK]
My Milked Eek (0) []pickemgenius (0) []
Super Awesome Mega Pimp! (0) []
wolframnhart (0) []
MagnaofIllusion (0) []
Nachomamma8 (0) []
DeathSauce (0) []
Not voting (1) [easjo682]
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline is currently March 29 at 3am EST (8am GMT).
Please notice the deadline is in less than 2 days. However, day will probably not end until several hours after deadline, depending on whether or not I'm awake at 3am that day.-
-
DeathSauce Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 868
- Joined: March 14, 2007
- Location: Farmington
-
-
DeathSauce Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 868
- Joined: March 14, 2007
- Location: Farmington
-
-
DeathSauce Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 868
- Joined: March 14, 2007
- Location: Farmington
OK, my second most suspicious character is Damon Gant.
Two absolutely contradictory reasons:
1) Leading, especially the part about informing the town not to listen to me unless I play his way, but many other instances. (also, repeated references to deadline, trying to build a sense of panic and unreason)
2) Following, statements like "my thoughts exactly".
Seems like he's trying to lead the town and doing so by building mini-alliances by agreeing with others in a creepy way.-
-
My Milked Eek Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4277
- Joined: December 27, 2007
- Location: Belgium
-
-
wolframnhart Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2608
- Joined: July 1, 2008
- Location: California
Post received. I have no excuse for my absence the past couple days, I haven't had a mind set to play much, and as such I apologize to everyone. If DRK needs to replace me I understand, however I am going to try to be more active because I had to replace out of one game and i hate doing that and want to continue trying to play.
I still like my vote on MafiaSSK. As the biggest wagon (by a vote) right now he should be here trying to defend himself and scumhunting, he is doing neither, promising on Tuesday for a big post on Wed and not delivering. This easily can be scum hoping that someone different puts their foot in their mouth and have votes change to said person before deadline, and I am not buying it, not from SSK.They tell you never hit a man with a closed fist, but it is on occasion hilarious. - Malcolm Reynolds
Wolf, I fucking hate your face, but still <3 you as a whole. - Starbuck-
-
DeathRowKitty sheFrogshe
- Frog
- Frog
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: June 7, 2009
- Pronoun: she
-
-
Damon_Gant Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 436
- Joined: January 21, 2010
(Bold is by me)DeathSauce wrote:OK, my second most suspicious character is Damon Gant.
Two absolutely contradictory reasons:
1) Leading,especially the part about informing the town not to listen to me unless I play his way, but many other instances. (also, repeated references to deadline, trying to build a sense of panic and unreason)
2) Following, statements like "my thoughts exactly".
Seems like he's trying to lead the town and doing so by building mini-alliances by agreeing with others in a creepy way.
You're right in that I'm trying to lead the town. However, my motives are much simpler than what your post is implying. I want discussion, because I want to be able to scumhunt and it's very hard to scumhunt in a game of lurkers. I'm trying to create discussion as best as I can.
Also, it annoys me when people think that agreeing with people is scummy because it's an easy option. Sometimes (quite often in fact), as town, you just genuinely agree with what someone has to say. As town, I don't like to keep secrets, I like everyone to know my exact feelings on everything, and if that means agreeing with people, that's what it means.
As for the bolded bit...you're putting words into my mouth. I did not tell anyone not to listen to you at all. I said something along the lines of "How can you expect us to agree with you", I don't think that constitutes telling other people not to agree, just that I don't think you can expect the town to hop by your side with the way you presented your case.Swimming, anyone?
Call me Gant-
-
GreenDude Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 283
- Joined: June 4, 2009
I don't like how both MafiaSSK and Easjo are both not here. If mafiassk has computer problems then he might not be here before the deadline. Whilest easjo could be here, but isn't, so I think I is much more fair to lynch someone who can defend themselves than someone who can't.
I didn't say I voted because he was lurking. I'm going to show some posts that I found interesting tomorrow.MME wrote:1) a lurkervote (while ignoring peg and others (like magna said))
2) fence sitting
Fence sitting? Where do you see that?Violence is not the answer. It is a question, and my answer is yes!-
-
GreenDude Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 283
- Joined: June 4, 2009
-
-
MafiaSSK Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: November 25, 2007
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
-
Zodiark13 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 767
- Joined: January 9, 2010
- Location: No idea
Sorry all for having to be prodded. I didn't have much to say till 4 am last night, and last time I posted that late, I got quick-lynched.
Now, however, weALLneed to be as active as possible.
Explain how.
I've never seen such blatant misrepresentation before...So I'm scummy because I think someone is scummy?
What's the point of doing that?
Then if you realized all of that, why didn't you keep it to yourself?Hence the reasons I asked.
This post was directed at DS, who conceded that, though he didn't see SSK as scum, he did see him as anti town. I still expect people with scummy reads to lynch him for being scummy.
...by telling them to disregard their scum reads and lynch him for being anti-town. In other words, you're not getting people to join the lynch by showing HOW he's scummy, you're just sitting there and saying "Well... he may not be scummy, but he's anti-town at least, so we should lynch him.How? You can't just call something scummy and not back it up. This also contradicts your point that I'm not pushing for a lynch. I'm trying to persuade others to join.
Because, as I already said, replacements always target me, so your attacking me doesn't hold much bearing in my opinion.
Why would you wait to FoS? Afraid of how the town would view it if you did?You can't just replace and then throw things like that around with as poor a reason as this. I'll give you then benefit of the doubt and not FoS you just yet.
Then get off the wagon going nowhere, and get on the one going somewhere.My Milked Eek! wrote:
I wouldn't mind a lynch of:
- zodiark13
- mafiassk
- easjo
You procrastinated for four days, then post this crap?! Was this what we would have expected if you had posted on time?
It's truly annoying just to get to this page. can someone give a brief overview of my case? I will do my best to do the big post on day 2. sorry i got struck by adware.
*walks out of bomb shelter in disgust*
I will give you your summary, but to present to the town as evidence of your scummyness. Give me about 10 or so minutes to go and get it.Returning froma spontanious extended sabatical. Posting from an Android with a crappy touch keyboard, so spelling mistakes will occur with wild abandon.-
-
MafiaSSK Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: November 25, 2007
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
-
Zodiark13 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 767
- Joined: January 9, 2010
- Location: No idea
-
-
MafiaSSK Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: November 25, 2007
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
-
Zodiark13 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 767
- Joined: January 9, 2010
- Location: No idea
-
-
MafiaSSK Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: November 25, 2007
- Location: Washington, D.C.
-
-
MafiaSSK Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5338
- Joined: November 25, 2007
- Location: Washington, D.C.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.