Ok, large catch-up post incoming … you have been warned.
SAMP wrote:Do you usually not check statements like that for accuracy?
After seeing this I went back and checked. You are correct. I took the top of the page summary at its face without seeing that quick unvotes had happened. My mistake. I'm not thrilled with MafiaSSK's response because he could have done the exact same thing I did. Instead he immediately retracted his vote. Sits with me as a fairly big backtrack, even with his 'early morning statement' retraction.
@MafiaSK - Why didn't you go on the offensive and question me about it, given you were the one I questioned.
MafiaSSK wrote: Because it can heavily distract the town away from scumhunting.
The town players can only be distracted if they allow themselves to be. Do you think that the playerbase here is that weak in general?
Greenguy wrote:
I was wrong to call it a theory because it was just an idea. But a theory is like an possible explanation to something. Which it was.
A) Why should evidence be provided if it isn't not supposed to cause a lynch or start a bandwagon but simply create discussion (ironic isn't it?)
B) Why "prod" if the point is not to lynch or bandwagon but to create discussion.
A. Even for theories meant to provide discussion evidence is crucial in that it provides a basis for the discussion. Just throwing a random theory with no supporting substance is only going to produce discussion about how anti-town that behavior is.
B. Prodding for answers would create deeper discussion than just wild speculation.
Zodiark wrote:
Ok, starting a wagon because you don't like the way that GD tries to provoke discussion? Thats just fishy. I understand that we are now 11 days away from the deadline, and with little to go on, but a wagon like that could possibly halt discussion.
As I’ve discsussed above and other players have mentioned the problem certainly isn’t with Greendude attempting to provoke discussion. It’s with the method he used, which is supefical and not very effective. Do you seriously think that building a bandwagon means that players are unable to look at other people other than Greendude?
easjo682 wrote:Wow, people round here are quick to join Bandwagons and then later to climb off said wagon. The green wagon gained speed very quickly and little was gained out of it, I'm now concerned that some of the voters on that wagon are scum all the people who jumped so quickly onto the wagon have gained alot of suspicion from my eyes.
Who in particular do you find scummy based on their comments and when they jumped on the wagon?
@Wolframhart – You’ve been pretty quiet so far and I know you are an experienced player. I’d like to hear some thoughts from you regarding the last few pages of the thread.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.