evilsnail wrote:iLord wrote:Additionally, what do you feel about tate not answering questions asking him about his reads on other players? Do you feel it's okay for anyone to do so with impunity?
I don't think it's straightforwardly scummy. It's obviously not helping the town, but it's very counterproductive as scum. So I don't feel it's a strong tell either way.
Why didn't you say that D1? I remember I, for one, have specifically said on D1 that I
do
think it might benefit tate as scum to do so. If you disagreed, why didn't you say anything on the subject?
---
Albert B. Rampage wrote:Why is evilsnail getting into so much trouble because he doesn't want to lynch me? That's not normal and I can't help but think that someone is pulling the strings here.
Vote: Diamondilium
What? Starbuck was the one accusing evilsnail for defending you.
---
evilsnail wrote:And let's not pretend that tate coasting through this game refusing to answer questions is a reasonable scenario. Obviously that's not going to happen.
Seeing that you're arguing in favour of his actions not being scummy, that's pretty hypocritical.
---
manho wrote:vote: iLord
for correctly finding McG fakeclaiming townie. there is no way you can do it unless you are scum.
@iLord, by which post of McG you are sure he is pro-town?
This feels kinda opportunistic. Don't you have anything else new to say and you just choose to reiterate things that have already been said?
(Although now manho unvotes. Hmm. It does speak in favour of he simply not following the game much, rather than knowingly jumping on wagons.)
---
Pie_is_good wrote:-The mechanic of the game strongly suggests that the cult can grow indefinitely. That is, it's not like once we lynch the cultmaster, the cult loses their ability to recruit. That means that
we cannot win this game on lynchings alone
. Which further implies that we have at least one vig on our team, with likely even more killing roles (SK, maybe?) out there somewhere. I expect all of you to be killing, every night. Even in a non-cult game it's a good idea. In a cult game, it's basically mandatory.
Not necessarily. The term "zombie lords" from the sample townie PM implies that there are zombie lords who aren't regular zombies. So it seems possible that we can win as town while there are still zombies alive out there (or unlive, as the case might be
)
(This has been later addressed by yos, but I'll leave it here anyway)
---
iLord wrote:evil wrote:Yes, that's why I'm voting you. I think there's a legit case on tate also, but there's no rush in getting to that.
Incidentally, you mention the legit case against tate. Most interested to hear what this constitutes.
This is a very good point. evilsnail says that tate's not answering questions is a poor case and not scummy, and at the same time believes there is a legit case on him. What would that be, him referring to the sample townie PM?
---
I also think the case on tate/pie is still valid. In contrast to what e_k has said, I don't think tate was a VI. I've explicitly said that D1 when I was voting for him, in fact: he seemed to be very aware of his actions and their implications.
---
bv310 wrote:Okay, I'll believe that.
Either way, I'd like to see what you think of the ABR mini-wagon.
How about you say some of your opinions? The only real "opinion" you've expressed today is that tate replacing out makes him scummier in your eyes (which didn't stop you from unvoting him, though).
What do
you
think of the ABR mini-wagon?
---
bv310 wrote:Pie, if that's as far in as you are, you're going to be very upset in like two pages.
It's disturbing how you apparently follow the game intently enough to remember what was going on where at the beginning of D1, and still post practically zero content.
---
reck: it has been said many times already, and confirmed by farside, that when the cult targets a PR, that player simply dies instead of being recruited.
