921 Space Quest Mafia (officially Mod Abandoned)

Zang · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:54 pm

Kaiyruu has two votes though and he was in the top two scum picks of others.

And if that wasn't your reason what is?

TheButtonmen · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:55 pm

Zang wrote:Kaiyruu has two votes though and he was in the top two scum picks of others.

A) One other person is a majority?
B) Whats that have to do with what you said?

Zang · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:03 pm

I consider it a majority because it had the most votes

it was obvious that others would soon vote for him

TheButtonmen · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:06 pm

Zang wrote:I consider it a majority because it had the most votes

it was obvious that others would soon vote for him

A) it didn't have the most votes; B) You considered it a majority because it might become one?

Zang · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:15 pm

What I consider to be the definition of a majority is of little importance at this moment what I do believe to be important Is that you still haven't answered the question of why you voted for ddd.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:20 pm

Zang wrote:What I consider to be the definition of a majority is of little importance at this moment what I do believe to be important Is that you still haven't answered the question of why you voted for ddd.

Because there's more then one definition of a majority?

Zang · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:24 pm

What are you saying?

Doombunny9 · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:37 pm

Buttonmen, I find this a very obvious stalling attempt. You are sidetracking from the real question that was asked that you STILL haven't answered or gave a reason to not answer. At this point I can seeno possible way that you are town so please, for the love of god, answer the question: What was your reason for voting DDD and if you can't answer that, explain why.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:42 pm

Sidetracking and stalling? I was

fairly

completely blunt and straight forward.

ksen · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:01 am

TheButtonmen wrote:Sidetracking and stalling? I was
fairly
completely blunt and straight forward.

You were? Please direct me to the post where you were blunt and direct about why you are voting for DDD now.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:13 am

We have been over this.

ksen · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:37 am

TheButtonmen wrote:We have been over this.

Oh, so you

haven't

been blunt and direct about why you've decided DDD would make a good lynch.

Thanks for clarifying.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:40 am

When did I claim to have done that? I said i wasn't side tracking or stalling.

ksen · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:58 am

TheButtonmen wrote:When did I claim to have done that? I said i wasn't side tracking or stalling.

You did. And then I asked where you were blunt and straight-forward about why you changed your vote to DDD.

You linked me to a post that said nothing about why you changed your vote to DDD. You are refusing to say why you've changed your mind about DDD.

How is that helpful to Town?

TheButtonmen · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:03 am

ksen wrote:
TheButtonmen wrote:When did I claim to have done that? I said i wasn't side tracking or stalling.
You did. And then I asked where you were blunt and straight-forward about why you changed your vote to DDD.

I was never blunt and straight-forward about why I changed my vote, nor did I claim to be. I was blunt and straight-forward in that I havn't been stalling or sidetracking the question.

dramonic · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:23 am

Unvote
Vote: Button

Seriously. Stop squirming.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:28 am

Squirming? Back that up brohiem, make a case, use quotes, go nuts!

Zang · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:52 am

TheButtonmen wrote:Squirming? Back that up brohiem, make a case, use quotes, go nuts!

Why should he? You didn't with your DDD vote

ksen · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:02 am

@Mod:

Can we get a count?

I think Dramonic's vote put TheButtonmen at L-1.

TheButtonmen · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:04 am

I didn't accuse DDD of squirming. He on the other hand made a specfic accusation; thus I'm saying I'd love to see it fleshed out.

smashbro_of_the_SSS · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:40 am

Hi guys, I'm replacing spambot, so later on today i should have read through everything. Just letting you know I'm here.

ksen · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:47 am

Welcome to the game smashbro.

Zang · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:50 am

Welcome

dramonic · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:23 am

for like the past 3 pages all you've been doing is giving evasive and meaningless answers. Get concrete

smashbro_of_the_SSS · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:48 am

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Doombunny9 wrote:@ortolan: How is DDD town? Likewise, how are Mordy and Spambot scum? I see no reasons for why you should suspect either of them or think that DDD is town.
The how is the mod sent me a town based PM, that is how I'm town. You want to know the "why", not the "how".

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Q: Why isn't dramonic dead yet? What is wrong with you people?

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
dramonic wrote:...look, I don't like you either, doesn't mean I disrespect you every other post. Make an effort please.
I am making an effort, to harass you into making a mistake I can lynch you for.

These posts scream scum to me. Claiming when you have one, maybe two votes on you?

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Unvote; Vote: ortolan

He wouldn't have pulled that stunt as a town role worth saving, hence either worthless town or scum. And frankly I have no interest in playing with someone who doesn't want to play.

This is the second to last vote, maybe admitting there was no way to save a partner? Either way, he was reluctant until then to join.

ksen wrote:
TheButtonmen wrote:Can we stop just asking "Why?" to everything?
Good suggestion . . . can we get your reads?

Also, I'm usually against giving reads other than top 2 or 3 scum. Just because it tends to help give the scum a better idea of who they can kill.

Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
TheButtonmen wrote:Enough with the speculation regarding SK for now I think. Todays been entirely people welcoming Malt and agreeing it's an SK. It's much easier to look for associative tells from mafia rather then SK hunting.

Post more once I have a chance to look through D1 agian.
It's never too early to vote for ksen again.

Vote: ksen

TheButtonmen wrote:Agreeded,

Vote: Ksen

What is this? I don't see much substance on ksen for a reason why to vote him, especially by the post you quoted.

Then, DDD, when Kairyuu places a case against you, you turn around with unprecedented posting ability (in this game). YOu post 4 paragraphs worth of arguments, and you decided that it would be better for shorter posts earlier in the game?

I don't like Zang either, but I don't see him being a problem right now, as there are others who are scummier and would be more likely to convince townies otherwise.

Overall, this thread has given me a headache. most posts only had one line of info which gave little new to the conversation, until Kairyuu came in. Bad because of lack of scumtells.

I would vote for DDD, but waiting on the votecount for now. I believe my vote would only put him at L-1, but it can wait.