And no, if you mean solely.
As I said, if not in so many words, I
Is being defensive scummy? If so why?Ythan Post 408 wrote:The sheer volume of defensive content coming in response to my gut case is just baffling.
His statement of "breaking his meta" and my still unanswered question of why he chose this game to do this.Kthxbye Post 459 wrote:Sotty: Why are you willing to move back to Ray? What about his play thus far has made you believe he is scum? I'm sure you have said it before, but a post now consolidating your case on Ray (I'm assuming you have one) would be helpful.
I'll pretty much agree with this though I am personally of a mind to give Inquisitor a bit more of a pass since at least when he does post he tends to post something with content that at least can be read for tells, the others on this list less so in my opinion. I'm also of a mind to still include Ray on that list since even with his current contributions he's playing evasive in his opinions.Copper wrote:Sajin is a total disgrace, Inquisitor and Cheshire seemed to have completely checked out of this game, and Pomegranate's absence has definitely been noticable.
Because you most assuredly haven't been ignoring stuff?Ythan wrote:Sotty's still on that "We're close to the deadline so I can just ignore Ythan's posts and post the same Smurf over and over" kick.
I certainly intend to continue to make motion in this direction. Ythan does have a kernel of truth in his commentary insomuch as I would rather like us to get to the L-1 stage for whomever it is we're going to be lynching by the end of today so we have time for a claim and some discussion prior to hammer.Ythan wrote:If you folks plan on lynching me you need to spit it outnow.
I will admit that I haven't given this game my all but don't discount his actions because I've done them as well. Scum points for both of us, not neither.Thor665 wrote:Because you most assuredly haven't been ignoring stuff?Ythan wrote:Sotty's still on that "We're close to the deadline so I can just ignore Ythan's posts and post the same Smurf over and over" kick.
I disagree with his attempt to rush to the deadline without answering anything.Do you disagree with a deadline pressured lynch?
I'm not saying it's policy.He has mentioned some things about you he feels are scummy in addition to the deadline pressure so I'm not sure if I really see this as only a policy lynch if that's what you're implying.
I think it might be a mistake to wait that long. After a claim if we choose to look elsewhere for a lynch we're already going to be very pressed for time.I certainly intend to continue to make motion in this direction. Ythan does have a kernel of truth in his commentary insomuch as I would rather like us to get to the L-1 stage for whomever it is we're going to be lynching by the end of today so we have time for a claim and some discussion prior to hammer.Ythan wrote:If you folks plan on lynching me you need to spit it outnow.
There was a big storm where I live Saturday, and the internet went down, and only came back up late last night, and I didn't have a chance for mafia. Then I had school today. So here I am.Thor665 wrote:@Pom - please just provide your scum list, I actually don't even understand why it's hard to do for you. Giving one or two scummiest names should be the matter of a few seconds of work. Your dragging of your feet to provide them later concerns me - when you provide them could you clarify why you needed so much time to give two names?