Let's review what I was talking about during the early phase of this game and see if it matches my insanity reveals and my reasoning for timing...
------------------
1. I state my belief that claims are pro-town and a way to lead to town victory (Adel was vehement against any type of claims, I highly disagreed about that. My reveals were to help with EK's chart.)
SlySly wrote:Adel wrote:I'm not claiming day 2.
Noise, action and insanity claims in the first game led to an overwhelming town victory. What better alternative do you suggest? A hardline stance against claims providing a tracking system for the town seems a little anti-town to me.
-----------------
2. I bring up checking people with Occult Books several times very early in the game (After the Ani debacle got into full swing, I knew I was going to take Occult Books on N1 and if I survived that long to commune someone on N2.) I was hoping someone may have picked some OBs on N0 and could validate ani's claim. It came to a point where it didn't matter after the vote test.
SlySly wrote:
If he is covering up a future insanity, that could be validated if someone has Occult Books and used them on Ani.
SlySly wrote:iLord wrote:
SlySly wrote:If he is covering up a future insanity, that could be validated if someone has Occult Books and used them on Ani.
On Night 0?
No, N1. If the OB user has 0 insanity, as should be the case right now, and Ani is lying, the results would be negative as Ani would have 0 insanity as well.
The rules, Commune description wrote:
Effect: You learn whether your target has (strictly) more
than you.
SlySly wrote:Nicodemus wrote:I'm not quite sure where you get the certainty to make such bold statements. How do we
know
that Ani isn't cult fake-claiming an insanity so that he can kill in the ritual tonight? How are you so sure that Ani is telling the truth about his insanity this time, as opposed to another lie? I am far from convinced that Ani is "obvInvestigator" as you say.
He can be checked with Occult Books. If he has no insanity, he is lying scum. If he does, he is either idiot town or stalker town. Town = worse lynch than scum. Pushing for town instead of scum hunting = proScum. I think he has an insanity NOW and was just trying to explain it off. I am more than willing to believe he stalked.
SlySly wrote:
If it is because he is scum and trying to cover up a future insanity, which I find highly unlikely, that can be checked with Occult Books.
Even Chaco chimes in that I am thinking correctly about my understanding of OB usage.
Chaco wrote:Yeah, Sly and Semi have the right idea on using the occult books.
And iLord acknowledges his misunderstanding of OB usage.
iLord wrote:SlySly wrote:No, N1. If the OB user has 0 insanity, as should be the case right now, and Ani is lying, the results would be negative as Ani would have 0 insanity as well
Ah okay, I thought Commune happened after Insanity gained from Ritual.
-----------------
3. Being the first person to believe ani had stalked after his admitting his laundering lie (takes a stalker to know and believe one). I was about the only person willing to believe Ani's story, even after the insanity validation check was done via vote test on him. Also, I point out that not all stalkers have to become murderers.
SlySly, condensing the Adel fight about Ani being a stalker to this, wrote:
I explained it plenty well. And, I was right. Once he revealed he had stalked, obviousness struck that he was obvTown trying to cover his insanity with a bogus Launder claim. It was pretty clear before that that he wasn't cult, you just weren't willing to accept it openly.
SlySly wrote:iLord wrote:Wait, what could've scumAni done to gain an insanity? Stalk?
The rules, Stalk description wrote:
Prerequisites: You must be an
Investigator
or a
Murderer
.
SlySly wrote:
As I stated before, I would rather lynch scum than a later potential murderer. Ani is not a murderer yet and may not become one. Ani voters, start scum hunting.
------------------
4. I clearly state my hating game breakers and opposition to ell's plan
SlySly wrote:Ellibereth wrote:
Sly, tell me what's wrong with my plan from your Point of view.
It is still a variant of a game breaker.
SlySly wrote:
I am not participating in Ell's plan.
------------------
5. I call ell naive for expect stalkers to claim after the trouble ani and ell brought upon themselves doing so at that point in the game.
SlySly wrote:Ellibereth wrote:I think anyone who stalked N0 and want to still win the game should claim.
I think counting on such is somewhat naive.
-------------------
Here is my one lie where I was trying to avoid the unneeded early heat that ani and ell brought on themselves. If I get lynched for this one lie, it is not a total loss as the town will at least know that Magua had 1 or less insanities last night and that my claimed insanity count is true. But keep in mind, there are others that didn't come forward as N0 stalkers either, and they are now murders, unlike me. They are probably among those on my wagon now or the source of the noise I heard last night and planning to murder me tonight anyway.
SlySly wrote:elvis_knits wrote:
I also want to say that I really dislike Sly's discussion of "vigs" throughout the thread. Nobody should be taking insanities and taking the path of MURDERERS in an effort to "vig" for the town. If you want someone dead that bad, let's lynch them.
You know no one ever agrees with my lynch targets!!! EVER!!!
Rest easy, I did not Stalk on N0 and have no intention of doing so on N1.
----------------
Do those that have played with me before actually believe that I would plant things this far ahead only to reveal them and put myself under fire when being under no pressure at all?
If you believe that, why didn't I point all of these things out immediately when the crosshairs got locked on me?
Occum's Razor.