Zachrulez wrote:The only problem with no lynching is that we go from 2 misplaced town votes leading to a quick hammer to only one misvote leading to such. It takes away any room for error.
It's a matter of deciding whether the next NK is going to really help the town that much or not.
Personally, I think we should lynch Nikanor and see where we're at after that. (And maybemislynchno lynch then.)
Yeah, I'm pretty confident that Nikanor will flip scum. (Moreso than the other reads I mentioned yesterday)
Mini 922 - Mafia in Mo Town [Game Over]
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
EBWOP
-
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
I disagree. I think a clear pattern is emerging regarding your play.Nikanor wrote:Well consideringIdrove it for the most part, I'm going to say no.
@Zach: Your case is still crap. Please think of something better if you're just going to piggyback kthx.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12859
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13337
I'm still reeling from letting you get away with your lurking in Sotty's game... not this time...-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
I am also going to point out that I inquired yesterday as to why Neto and Lowell were being run up, and no one bothered to respond/answer it.
Nikanor in particular chose to attack my lack of understanding rather than explain it to me.
If possible, I'd like the Lowell portion of that question answered this time around.
To me his play looks very much like tweed mafia and if the reasons for for wanting his lynch are the same as they are in that game... then I don't think it's a particularly great lynch.-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
Lol. You still insist that I was lurking in this game, eh?
If you want to see a game where I was town and lurked, and even said something equivalent to 'I need to catch up on these walls of text,' look no further than a game you should already be fairly familiar with: Mini 847. Here is the post where I said I needed to catch up.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
You're distorting a bit with that link.
For example in my game it didn't take you over 17 pages to actually bother to post any content or do any kind of scumhunting whatsoever. (And actually checking my game, my game reached 17 pages QUICKER than this game did.)
Also, you actively complained about the rate of posting in this game, something you didn't do there.
So why exactly did it take you 17 pages to actually start playing the game Nikanor?-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
No it didn't. Your game took eleven days to reach page 17. This game took seven days to reach page 17. I'd like to know how you'd make this mistake.Zach wrote:(And actually checking my game, my game reached 17 pages QUICKER than this game did.)
Also, I have a job now. I didn't have a job then.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
Okay, the game started on Feburary 9th. For whatever reason I thought it started on the first.Nikanor wrote:
No it didn't. Your game took eleven days to reach page 17. This game took seven days to reach page 17. I'd like to know how you'd make this mistake.Zach wrote:(And actually checking my game, my game reached 17 pages QUICKER than this game did.)
Also, I have a job now. I didn't have a job then.
Still... similarly paced game, and you had no trouble posting content in mine.-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
Went by the mod's first post. Being a replacement sucks.Zachrulez wrote:
Okay, the game started onNikanor wrote:
No it didn't. Your game took eleven days to reach page 17. This game took seven days to reach page 17. I'd like to know how you'd make this mistake.Zach wrote:(And actually checking my game, my game reached 17 pages QUICKER than this game did.)
Also, I have a job now. I didn't have a job then.Feburary 9thFebruary 10th. For whatever reason I thought it started on the first.
Still... similarly paced game, and you had no trouble posting content in mine.
If you want to get all semantical on that, I could compare your first 7 days of posting in this game to the first 7 of mine.-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
I didn't really want to link to this game, but here's an example of something that is probably a lot closer to my play in this game.I am in the bottom 10% of scumhunters onsite!-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Nikanor Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8216
- Joined: April 27, 2009
- Location: je nais se quo
-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8551
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
Saaaaay... why don't you tell us who you think is scum?Nikanor wrote:Well consideringIdrove it for the most part, I'm going to say no.
@Zach: Your case is still crap. Please think of something better if you're just going to piggyback kthx.
Wow me with some impressive analysis that you've been lacking all game.-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
Wait, are people really no lynching? Why are we (a) assuming 3 scum, and (b) assuming town doesnt have something like a doc to fight back? Also, do we think scum are goint to knock out one of our leading suspects overnight? Won't scum just get a free offing of someone generally agreed to be town? You really think scum are kicking themselves right now that we've discovered this awesome strategy?
No lynch is pointless at best, terrible at worst.-
-
KittyMo Too Sparkly
- Too Sparkly
- Too Sparkly
- Posts: 5142
- Joined: March 17, 2009
- Location: Oregon
[2] No Lynch - (xRECKONERx, hitogoroshi)
[0] AlmasterGM - ()
[0] almightybob - ()
[0] Espeonage - ()
[0] hitogoroshi - ()
[0] Lowell - ()
[0] Nikanor - ()
[0] xRECKONERx - ()
[0] Zachrulez - ()
[6]Not Voting- (AlmasterGM, almightybob, Espeonage, Lowell, Nikanor, Zachrulez)
With8alive, it's5to lynch!
Deadline is at Wednesday, March 24, 2010 at 7:30:00 AM (Los Angeles time).Last edited by KittyMo on Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.Alt of Ariel | MafiaScum wiki volunteer contributor & sysop | Identity (Mish Mash) is back | Speakeasy Secret Santa
"plz don't swear" -- N
"Do people just not appreciate the good old wall of text anymore?" -- Cheery Dog-
-
Espeonage anySurvivorany
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11651
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Pronoun: any
- Location: Existential Dread of my Inner Thoughts
-
-
hitogoroshi ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: February 24, 2008
- Location: shiftless layabout
3 scum is the case in the majority of these set-ups. Even if it wasn't, the precautionary principle seems to be prudent here.Lowell wrote:Wait, are people really no lynching? Why are we (a) assuming 3 scum
I alluded to this in my last post - it'd be different if we had a single player virtually everyone had a town read on, but from what I see we have no 'confirmed townie'-esque players and the scum really won't have a choice but to shoot someone that at least a couple of people find suspicious. This will also give us another confirmed townie's worth of reads.and (b) assuming town doesnt have something like a doc to fight back? Also, do we think scum are goint to knock out one of our leading suspects overnight? Won't scum just get a free offing of someone generally agreed to be town? You really think scum are kicking themselves right now that we've discovered this awesome strategy?
And it's not about the scum kicking themselves - it's just that a no lynch isless badthan the alternative.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't have an 100% scum read on anyone. Not Nik, and (despite your shenanigans at the end of D2) not even you, Lowell. If someone else has a read that they're willing to pin everything on (since we're probably in MYLO) vote and give me a case why, but as it stands I think no lynch is the best move here."Don’t buy a dozen eggs if you just want a hardboiled egg. Don’t buy a head of lettuce if you just want a salad. Don’t buy eggs and lettuce if you want egg salad because those are not the right ingredients." -Julius Bloop-
-
xRECKONERx GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- GD is my Best Man
- Posts: 26087
- Joined: March 15, 2009
I'm sorry, this logic is awful.Lowell wrote:Wait, are people really no lynching? Why are we (a) assuming 3 scum, and (b) assuming town doesnt have something like a doc to fight back? Also, do we think scum are goint to knock out one of our leading suspects overnight? Won't scum just get a free offing of someone generally agreed to be town? You really think scum are kicking themselves right now that we've discovered this awesome strategy?
No lynch is pointless at best, terrible at worst.
a) Please point me to a 12 player game with one NK every night and anything other than 3 scum. It's pretty much standard at this point - for every exception to the rule, I can find twenty that follows is.
b) If town has doctor, then they'd only have a 1/7 chance to select the right target (assuming no self-protects)... and what if THEY get targeted?
Now, let's be smart and start using non-scum-motivated logic: a no lynch guarantees that we won't lose overnight AND any protective roles could still stop the kill. If we lynch today (which, if we did, I'd be coming at you with a vengeance at this point) then we're risking killing a townie and given scum the win overnight.green shirt thursdays-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.