ortolan wrote:CMAR what do you think of Anon? I will vote after this question is answered.
1. Right when I started to read this game I got the feeling that he was a noob town, and if he is scum, he's doing it very well
2. From a town perspective, I obviously thought the NK was lame cuz it framed me...but if I had been scum I'd have probably done the same thing, why give more info to the town when they already suspect town?
And I'm still pretty sure that Charter is scum...so
I may have a questionable record on these sorts of decisions, so apologies in advance if I'm wrong.
If charter is scum he has played very well. I would lynch him last out of CMAR and Anon.
Rereading Anon I'm not as sure I had as much of a basis to suspect him as I thought. There were quite a few little things. I'm not sure if he had scum motivation to draw attention to his scumbuddy in ISO 2 like that, I also like the fact he voted SOG and I previously took his tunneling OMGUS on me as a towntell and I think I'm back to that point now.
And CMAR pretty much forced me to vote him by posting 510.
So here we go
Vote: CryMeARiver
I'm gonna have to write off DoS's 456 as an attempt at WIFOM. It does make sense as scum play because if/when one or the other of them were lynched it would come very close to confirming the other for the rest of the game. Plus SOG was even supporting his own lynch around that time. Good game!
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
I was the first person killed and then I kept up with the game
and actually got the thread opened for you guys once
I take no blame because I didn't get to shoot anyone.
Wow, I thought we had no chance in this game.
I still think it was kind of town-weighted- town basically controls 2 kills a day and could probably prevent some nightkills with creative use of the safezone.
I joined this game because I really wanted to save my shot and shoot someone. I was a little disappointed when I got my role and learned that would never even be a possibility.
Also, using the safe zone at all would have been a HUGE help to the town. I ran the math on it from scum's perspective and it was just miserable to think about. I'm glad it was never used.
@charter
Post 600 was what I was really hoping someone would get out of my play. I was actually paranoid that you thought I was scum and was trying to get a read off my possible partner so I didn't want to go after DragonsofSummer if that were the case and give away that he wasn't.
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
Apathy kills games and daykills people recklessly. That is the one thing everyone should be getting out of this.
Also, statistical quirk- Cobalt has now been scum in all 3 games I've played with him. (once SK, once I was Mafia buddies with him, now this).
I did not deserve that daykill. It was ridiculous apathy-pushing and was absolutely inexcusable. When games degenerate to "I'm bored, how about yabbaguy?" or whoever, you know you're doing something wrong. Accuse the apathetic and hold the gun to his head. Do something.
I think the constant aspect of the game possibly being possibly being powerrole infested was what screwed us up. Anon having a kill would've screwed us up then, so I suppose that wasn't the case.
CMAR- you posted one of your posts consistently with ellipses...thus never providing an actual sentence...kind of like this one...it looked like you were indecisive with your thoughts...and made you look like an apathetic scum...know what I mean?
Clear sentences. Please.
Everyone who randomly killed is full of fail and needs to lurk less.
Bad game, okay setup. Honestly, I thought setup balance-wise was okay and almost town-favorable with effective Double Day Mafia, but yea, the safezone mechanic needs tinkering. I think if we tried what we did with semi every time before we killed someone, scum could slip their buddies in among all the townies, and nobody would know what the hell to think, so I don't see the massive statistical favoring that SOG suggests.
Using the safezone secretly as a town gatekeepr ensured a larger endgame of people who were out of bullets. With scum only being able to slip one person into this group regardless, it would provide the town with more lynches to catch the final scum.
I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own.
meh, gg. CMAR tied my hands by trying to lynch me instead of semioldguy, then going for charter when the only other person I would have voted was Anon. Wouldn't have mattered if I'd stuck with the meta read cause I doubt I could have convinced charter and CMAR to vote Anon anyhow (when I tried to scrutinise Anon all it resulted in was charter threatening to vote me)
yabbaguy wrote:I did not deserve that daykill. It was ridiculous apathy-pushing and was absolutely inexcusable. When games degenerate to "I'm bored, how about yabbaguy?" or whoever, you know you're doing something wrong. Accuse the apathetic and hold the gun to his head. Do something.
In fairness I did kind of have a scumread on you. It was based on something substantial, you "knowing" the role PMs were samples. I have generally found that sort of slip to be quite a reliable scumtell in many cases. As it happened I was wrong, and I am sorry.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
that post-content based mechanic sounds interesting actually. It does kind of screw with the town who (perhaps inevitably) try to second guess the setup though. And it does render the scum PM shown to the town rather misleading.
Currently modding Mole Mafia: http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=20529
Feel free to PM me to be ready in case I need a replacement.
