semioldguy wrote:This is a dumb question, because the question Dry-fit asks supposes that he was not able to find an answer on his own which is why he had to ask in the first place. If you thought my vote was clearly serious, instead of asking Dry-fit to point out where it could be serious you should be able to point out yourself where/how you interpret my vote to have been serious.Bio Hazard wrote:dry-fit wrote:@ Semioldguy: Is your vote for Wdjat serious?
This also pinged on my scumdar. Why wouldn't it be?
Oh, I see you slightly addressed this:Oh goody!Bio Hazard wrote:There was nothing to suggest it was a joke.
You're right! I don't think there is anything to suggest it was a joke. But Dry-fits question wasn't whether the vote was a joke, his question asked if the vote was serious. (Yes, there is a difference as joke/serious are not the only two things a vote can be) What suggests that the vote was serious to you? And now, go look at all my votes previous to my vote on wdjat. Explain to me how you determine any of them to be either a joke or serious (or something else entirely).
You really want me to go back and tell you why I think your vote is serious? What do you think was dry-fit's point in asking the question?
The difference between you and dry-fit is that dry-fit was never on the wdjat "wagon" to begin with.semi wrote:There is no substance to this claim. How is Dry-fit derailing a wagon? How is he starting a wagon? Why am I not the one guilty of derailing/starting the wagons? (after all, not only did I move my vote off of wdjat onto SerRose first, but I called for Dry-fit's vote on SerRose as well) Your statement is just not very accurate.Bio Hazard wrote:dry-fit wrote:Sounds like fun.
unvote. vote: SerRose
So, you derail a wdjat wagon to start a SerRose wagon. If wdjat flips scum, dry-fit is also likely scum.
Well, I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on this one.semi wrote:Just because a good point is made does not mean it doesn't direct power roles. It most certainly does in this case. Any statement offering a suggestion that power role do something is pretty clearly direction.Bio Hazard wrote:dry-fit calls DJ down for trying to "direct" power roles, which is complete BS, because DJ has a good point.
For example. If I were to say "the tracker/watcher would be best suited to watch the claimed doctor" this could be argued as a good point. But to claim it isn't directing a power role is just dumb. I most certainly would be directing a power role with my statement.
Even if the point is good, making these suggestions can be scummy, because it attempts to divert an investigative night action away from oneself. It would be in scum's best interest to do this.
semi wrote:Are you saying that the only way to derail a wagon is for there to be a connection from the derailing player to the derailed player?Bio Hazard wrote:No, because there's nothing else to suggest a connection between you and SerRose.Dry-fit wrote:
Both of them had two votes on them when I voted for SerRose. So if I had voted for Wdjat, would that have been derailing the SerRose wagon?Yes. Wagons can't be derailed in any other way? So I guess it isn't possible for me to ever derail any wagon unless I connect myself to that player first.What does this mean?Shit.