hewitt wrote:I feel like every game I play with Lowell it's the same story. He doesn't really do anything and then cracks underneath a straw of pressure and lashes out and professes that he's more helpful than X player and that it'd be a mistake to lynch him and we'd be dumb to do that. I know that in every game I've played with him he's been extremely unhelpful and more of a hindrance to the town than anything. A player I would be very scared to see travel far in the game and have in any tight situations.
hewitt wrote:My past game history with Lowell doesn't affect my read on him this game but I do like to generally lynch weaker players earlier in the game. If there isn't a good lead on scum on D1 then I pursue a weak player lynch until a better option arises.
hewitt wrote:Incorrect statement. I voted to lynch Lowell because I know he's a weak player and hasn't done anything to change my mind in THIS game. He's someone I would be very frightened to have last far in the game if he is indeed a town player.
hewitt wrote:It's not advocating a policy lynch based on meta, I believe he's the weakest player in this game and I know from past experiences that he doesn't change after D1. So after the showing he's made this game, cracking under pressure, I know that he's going to continue being a weak player. And again, based on this game, he's not somebody I'd want to travel far in the game unless he is in fact a cop.
hewitt wrote:I feel like you're purposely ignoring the fact that I've stated that a lynch on a player like Lowell is only prime if there are no good leads on scum. And that I'm pretty sure I've made it clear a lynch like this is not preferable, but it's the best option when there's nowhere else to go.
hewitt wrote:I do not think Lowell is a moron. I think he's quite the opposite. I think he knows how to further himself in the game whether it's in the town's best interest or not by playing defense.
danakillsu wrote:But you can't explain why?
How about you go explain how I'm contradicting myself. Because I'm clearly not.