KMD wrote:Pulindar wrote:She was steadfast with her opinions and votes
She kept her reasons for her votes clear
Kept her suspicions readable, and gave reasons.
supported theories that tend to help town.
She brought up original points on people.
She pointed out when there was a lack of suspicion on suspicious actions.
She pointed out some lurkers, but continued to go after those she felt were scummy rather than tried to distract town.
Basically, in my mind she's playing a near perfect town game.
-Not sure what you mean by "steadfast".
-How is clarity a towntell? I don't feel that this changes in my own game based on alignment.
-Show an example of "supporting theories to help town". If you did this already, restate it please because I missed it.
-What original points did she bring up and why can't scum do the same?
-I'll give you that one.
-Going after lurkers was a distraction?!? How'd we bag Nacho-scum?
-I disagree.
I mean that she kept with her votes throughout entire days, and that she kept suspicion on the same people.
Good point, it doesn't. What I meant more is that I agreed with her reasoning, which is why it seemed clear to me. There are many times where I disagree with people's reasons, or feel that they are misrepresentations. In those cases I suspect the people of being scum. Does that clear up my point?
Sorry, again I was unclear, I almost talked about how she kept her vote on Nika the whole of day one and kept pressing him. But by theories I meant more things like a complete first day and such. Her reaction to the Nika fake lynch was the most telling for me. She wanted the day to last longer because she wanted to find out more about what others thought before lynching Nika. Her "Relief" wasn't because Nika was still alive, but because she wanted more evidence before we ended the day. Without it we would have wasted the time we could have used, and have used, from day 1. She kept her vote on Nika even after she was glad that Nika was not lynched.
Scum can do the same, you're right.
the main reason you bagged Nacho were his actions after some pressure was applied, true. But Mae made some valid points. She pointed out who was lurking as the game went along. When pressure was applied on Nacho she asked why that specific lurker. There may have been a few reasons, but frankly the one lurking the most was McZombie. What I meant though was that while she pointed out who was lurking she still chased after who she was most confident was scum. Sure there were scum among the lurkers, but she kept true to the evidence and just mentioned the lurkers to keep track. by keeping track of the lurkers when she no longer had people she outrightly suspected she had people who were already lurking and would not be bad to pressure.
I realize that KMD. I also realize I don't have the best track record, but that's still how I feel. Though I do like what you've had to say so far and would love to hear more. The more ways we look at something the more full, and objective, our opinion can be
____________________________________
on a different note, I don't really get the numbers either. I think it might be how well she thinks each person is playing, or who she thinks is most scummy. If it's who she thinks is most scummy though... she's voting Dram and Dram is in the middle.
"If I had to label someone as dangerous, it'd be Pulindar. I have a feeling his scum game is very similar to his town game.... What I think is dangerous about Pulindar is that his scumreads feel so liquid. He can post a wall of questions and decide he doesn't like your answer to one of them and justify a vote on you." ~ Prawneater
complete fail on my own uncertainty at the time) (with Nacho, we were both town)
