Did a little rereading.
cruelty wrote:million dollar question.
I'd love to say TQO but he's too scummy to be for real.
I think scum is somewhere in
vivi,
SC, jack and agar. Need to re-read day 1 though.
He has vivi as one of the scum.
cruelty wrote:
With regards to Zang I keep changing my mind. On the one hand, yeah he's scummy, but on the other hand his scumminess is barely believable. The problem is (much like TQO) that I don't really have a bad gut vibe from him - I can see his posts coming from newb town with a genuine desire to help and a naive propensity to find the scummiest way he possibly can to contribute.
Having said that, I'll get behind a Zang lynch if the majority want, I'm not going to push his wagon because I'm honestly not completely sold on his guilt (intellectually I'm aware the evidence is stacking up but my head has been wrong lately).
Vivi, as others have said has been next to useless (8 posts, no real info whatsoever). The more I re-read your posts the less I like you, I note specifically your attack on the TBM wagon (Vivi iso 7) and the convenient mini-assault on Zang (iso posts 4-8). The lack of posting makes a read difficult but I get a bad gut vibe, so
vote: Vivi
.
Big discussion of how he is unsure about and TQO, he gives all the reasons about why it's hard to tell new players alignment. But when it comes to vivi there is no talk about new players--he's done an ISO and finds many things suspicious. Bad gut vibe. Evidence.
cruelty wrote:
For those curious, I was
voting Vivi in order to try to provoke some activity out of her
, which seems to have worked for now, so
unvote, vote jack
. I think that ties 3 people at three votes.
Complete reversal--Now the vote on Vivi was just to provoke some activity out of her. He voted her in 516 and unvoted in 525, after one post.
cruelty wrote:
Incidentally vivi you need to step up your game. You're not involved, you're basically repeating points others have made (the above is a good example, you're just rewording Tony) and you're posting about once every 3 days. I suspect you're probably newbscum trying to avoid making errors, but what you're doing is very, very close to active lurking.
Now all the things he found very scummy about her, he has changed to mildly chastising her for doing. Compare to his post above where he talks about his ISO of her.
This last quote is what prodded me to reread and look at their connection. The "newbscum" bit, when "newbtown" is what makes sense in context stands out for me, because I recently made a very similar scumslip in a game (now finished). I referred to several lurkers I'd called suspicious as "newbtown" lurkers.
Vivi's posts today look like weak distancing from cruelty.
