oh my days.
I'm really having trouble seeing why we're trying to push for a rushed lynch and almost certainly hitting town. Am I really the only one who considers cutting the scum off of a day 1 mislynch a good idea?
The read that I have got from the first read through is that noone has really wanted to push anything, and suddenly we see a massive push to lynch someone, anyone. Just my opinion.
civilscum wrote:FUCK A NO LYNCH
well FUCK YOU then you scummy bastard.
havingfitz wrote:Your wagon has a bit of support and I do not think this entry into the discussion helps it much. I can understand asking for a no-lynch later in the game when they have room to lose one more town to a NK...to either give town more time to get a scum read on someone or to narrow down the pool of choices for scum to hide within.
So this is your initial input to the game...you have thrown out all the usual suspects (fair enough...no need to re-invent the wheel) without any additional elaboration.
In summary...bv310 was awful (agreed), you don’t like Civil Scum (does that mean you suspect him?), and you would like to see Haylen, Sandman, or Cyanide lynched (for what appears to be simply due to a lynch all lurkers sentiment since you didn’t provide any other reasons). Any thoughts on MrSuave and Confidanon? Do they fall into the same category as the other three lurkers you mention?
I really don’t like the no-lynch suggestion...especially for the reasons you provide. Basically you are saying, let’s give scum (and SK and possibly Vig) a chance to do their NKs (barring RBing and possibly Jailkeeping) and analyze those actions (isn’t that WIFOM?)? I think we get a lot more out of a D1 lynch than a D1 no lynch. We get a chance to hit paydirt (scum/SK) and we get to see who is on the wagon if we end up in a mislynch. All a no lynch vote on D1 is going to get us is a few deadplayers (scum or town) and a bunch of WIFOM to cloud the picture.
My vote stays on the player formerly known as bv310...and for the sake of clarity: Unvote: bv310, Vote: Darkstrike_11
BTW DS...have you ever played with any of the players in this game before?
You make a fair point about the no lynch suggestion. But I don't really agree. Remember that the town have night actions as well, we get something out of a night time too. Also the chances of lynching town at this point are extremely high.
You're right, the people I don't like are pretty much just lurking. Lurking then cropping up every once in a while to push the game in a certain direction. I don't like it.
Oh and the problem I have with Haylen is that she seems to be using her experienced status as a weight. I have been in a few games recently where lots of players have looked unswervingly to the experienced players in a game, and never challenging them. The whole idea that someone can deliberately change their meta is nigh on ridiculous. However, because she is the almighty Haylen, we seem to have taken it as read. I severely doubt that anyone can actually try to change their meta, its just too much effort. That makes her covering up for scummy posts she has made.
I'm not sure how to read you fitz...I dont like people trying to sway the town to particular lynches (although I guess its ok at this point in the game).
Oh and I don't believe I have played with anyone in this game before! (its part of the reason why I replaced in.
Final word, all these people trying to engineer lynches are looking bad. Not that this matters, I guess the only people listening to this are the few active players in this game already voting for me :/
I haven't necessary changed it, played as scum when town, played as town when scum and played as PR as SK. I will not dignify the fact you insinuated im arrogant with a response.
