ZOMBIES! - Zombies take over for the win!!!

MrSuave · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:08 pm

the prod has been picked. I shall post comments tomorrow, because I have a huge business assignment due and I must work on it.

CooLDoG · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:37 am

post comeing, gotta catch up here is a part.

Starbuck, the only reason I talked down to you was because I didn't want you making up my mind if he offended me or not. And also Some people like to "insight" other to maybe get a scum slip thats all. You seem pro-town to me btw...

CooLDoG · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:42 am

xRECKONERx wrote:
CooLDoG wrote:Just settle down and post content, and scum hunt (sorry that this sounds bad comeing from me).
-_-
Yes. Yes, it does.

Unvote; Vote: CooLDoG

Is this anything other then an omgus?
And lets see where my vote is? NOT ON YOU. Wooops looks like theirs some tyupe of hole in your plan. anyway I don't feel like your vote can be anything other then an omgus. And why did you want a mod kill soooo bad? "because it was modkillable

, plz kill him

" next we say "KILL THE MOTHERFUCKER> HE SHOULD BE MODKILLED!!

!!!! IT WAS DESERVED!!!!

" Why did you want a mod kill so bad? And is their anything that I must answer to other then an omgus. And look up how many other people said that you seemed over zelous for a mod kill. Again I'm not voteing you. I want my vote on the scummy/lurking tate for the moment.

WRP_Beater · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:57 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
WRP_Beater wrote:Ouff... Why do you request my prod? I'm here!
I asked you a question a long time ago and still no answer...

Didn't see it. I'm looking for it now.

WRP_Beater · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:09 am

Vote: XRECKONERX

WRP_Beater · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:10 am

Correction:

Unvote, vote: XRECKONERX

tatetothetot · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:36 am

Sorry everyone. Prod received and I am not replacing out. I can assure you I am usually much more active, just kinda had a hectic schedule at school recently. I will post something of content latter tonight.

farside22 · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:37 am

Rob Zombie a friend of the zombies says hi.

Reckoner (4) bv310, Kmd, McGriddle, WRP_Beater
tatetothetot (5) evilsnail, ZazieR, Wolframnhart, manho, CooLDoG
McGriddle (4) Morph, Yosarian2, Diamondilium, Starbuck
Zazie (1) ODDin
Manho (1) iLord
Wolf (1) Albert B. Rampage
CoolDog (1) xRECKONERx

vote voting:

MrSuave
tatetothetot
CryMeARiver

With 20 alive it will take 11 to lynch
Deadline is Monday March 8th, 9:00am PST

ODDin · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:38 am

WRP, this is NOT content.

manho · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:26 am

iLord wrote:None of these wagons are very appealing.

manho needs to get in here and rectify that.

what do you want me to rectify?

xRECKONERx · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:31 am

NOTE TO COOLDOG AND EVERYONE:

I NEVER ASKED THE MOD TO MODKILL HIM.

I SIMPLY STATED THAT IT WAS A BLATANTLY MODKILLABLE OFFENSE BECAUSE THERE SEEMED TO BE DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS.

HOLY SHIT, EVERYONE GET OFF MY FUCKING BALLS ABOUT IT.

McGriddle · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:36 am

xRECKONERx wrote:NOTE TO COOLDOG AND EVERYONE:

I NEVER ASKED THE MOD TO MODKILL HIM.

I SIMPLY STATED THAT IT WAS A BLATANTLY MODKILLABLE OFFENSE BECAUSE THERE SEEMED TO BE DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS.

HOLY SHIT, EVERYONE GET OFF MY FUCKING BALLS ABOUT IT.

It's called pressure, and you obviously can't take it. ie. freaking out, and personal attacks

xRECKONERx · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:41 am

Over extraneous metagame bullshit. Seriously, have you even fucking looked at the post in question? Here, LET ME SHOW YOU!

xRECKONERx wrote:Wow.

That's pretty blatantly modkillable.

Obviously I'm pushing for a modkill and CooLDoG's post is really accurate to what actually happened. [/sarcasm]

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:44 am

ITT we talk in caps like we're 5 years old.

McGriddle · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:45 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:ITT we talk in caps like we're 5 years old.

WAT

xRECKONERx · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:02 am

Wow.

Explain why you're voting for me, McGriddle.

McGriddle · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:08 am

xRECKONERx wrote:Wow.

Explain why you're voting for me, McGriddle.

Not again.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:09 am

Unvote, vote RECKONER

Meta reasons.

McGriddle · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:14 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote, vote RECKONER

Meta reasons.

My I have the reason, and the game link (unless its an ongoing game )

xRECKONERx · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:33 am

Ditto.

wolframnhart · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:50 am

OK I have a bit to post during my V/LA so i thought I would try to catch up while I could. I do not really see Reck asking for a mod kill, his reaction was much like mine, however since farside already explained the situation and then he still went on about it, along with his major over reaction and big caps lock frenzy it makes me wonder about Reck. This game has so many "will post later's" I really don't know how many could/are lurking town or lurkign scum, so I will give tate a chance to actually post something before deciding on him. for now

IGMEOY Reck

xRECKONERx · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:54 am

ODDin, do you still think Zazie is your best vote?

iLord · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:19 am

@Manho:

iLord wrote:
manho wrote:@ilord, i had voted tate before, and for the reason that he refered to the sample role pm.
Do you think that's the most scummy action going on? Referring to the sample role PM?

ABR needs to link if it's not ongoing, so far I see nothing on Reck's wagon. Wolf's last post was scummy for similar reasons Diamond's was a while back

xRECKONERx · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:47 am

Which is, what, exactly, iLord?

tatetothetot · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:49 am

My defense first:

manho wrote:@ilord, i had voted tate before, and for the reason that he refered to the sample role pm.

You and anyone else voting me for this reason... please lighten up. That is the laziest, worst reasoning I ever heard to vote for someone some 16 pages into the game.

CooLDog wrote:unvote, vote: tate
He acted scummy, and has not posted much at all. And because that is who I wanted to vote for before.

I had some issues to take care of. I have not posted in any other game I am in, so does that make me scum there too? I am sorry for being absent but life called for a bit.

wolf wrote:I still find tate scummy, as i have said before, though my initial vote was for pressure, i still don't think any town member should be fine with having four votes on them, now five i believe.

I am still not worried. There is a crap case against me and if I end up getting lynched for those reasons, which I won't, then town failed, despite what I would flip.

Zazzie wrote:But Tate, why aren't you voting?

I was gone.

My Attacks/thoughts:

Is anyone else getting annoyed with CooLDog's posts? 452 is just so hard to read. Unfortunately, those posts are the same as 101 dodgeball and he flipped scum there. Meta is thrown out for now but I do not want CD to reach lylo.

The banter between Reck and McGriddle as well as between iLord and Diamond feels like either town on town or town on scum. So this eliminates the possibility of them being scum together meaning if one of the above flips scum, it clears the opposite imo. I do have a question for iLord and Diamond though...

Why are you not voting each other? Do you find the other scummy or are you just questing each others style of play?

Zazzie... tunnel much? Have you had an opinion on anyone beside me this game?

For now, I am going to go with a manho vote. His posts are inadequate and screams active lurking.

Vote: Manho