Unfortuatly, that makes me slightly biased towards Lowell, however am slightly suspious of himLowell wrote:Jacob gets hilarious town points for the page 4 random vote. WIFOM all you want, but I seriously dont' see scum being that hilarious.
Why, you don't have to wait for the deadline before you can lynch?Gheb wrote:Uhm, did you earnestly just put Lowell at L-1, dana? I mean it's OK if you think he's scum but that's a bit drastic. Deadline's only on Saturday - no need to rush things.
That that is trueHewitt wrote:Jacob Savage-Wins most forgettable player up to this point award.
What are your qualifications for voting then. Because to me if you place a vote on someone then your intent is to lynch them.The1fifi wrote:Im gonaFosthis for now.
No I mean like I really want to know what your qualifications for voting someone are. It'll give me a little bit of insight on you, since I basically can't get any read off anything you've posted so far this game.The1fifi wrote:Don't get so defensive. I am just flaging that post for later on game, it may prove to be useful.
Yes yes the FoS is not a big deal, that's not what I care about. I wanted to know what your thoughts were in regards to voting to lynch...that's pretty much it.The1fifi wrote:Most of the times you vote, yes , its with a lynching intent. I don't doubt that is your case. I just wanted to flag that, ok, its one of those sentences that helps find scumslips later on game
Wdjat on 2/25 wrote:Mod wrote:[stand out more]Vote Count-Sho
Scott-tatetothetot,
Lowell-Wdjat, Hewitt, kunkstar7, kyle99
Max-Gayle, kyle99
Jacob Savage-danakillsu
danakillsu-wdjat
Kunkstar-Lowell, Gayle, Gheb
Wdjat-Tatetothetot, danakillsu, the1fifi
Kyle99-Max[/stand out more]
Hewitt replaces gameplayah.
Deadline is 1 week from this Saturday.unvote
unvote
vote: danakillsu
Scott's not in the game. Tatetothetot and Gayle are voting for 2 people. Those votes should be on me and Kunkstar, respectively. Colors and bold would help these stand. Are you a mod that requires an unvote?
[ mod edit] Must've been a day that I didn't show up.
~ShoVOICE OF MOD:
kyle99 and I are both still voting for two people. I don't know where kyle99's vote should be, but mine was off Lowell for a few pages.Mod editing a 3/1 post wrote:Vote Count-Sho
Lowell-Wdjat, Hewitt, kunkstar7, kyle99, danakillsu
Max-kyle99
Jacob Savage-danakillsu
danakillsu-Lowell, wdjat
Kunkstar-Gayle, Gheb
Wdjat-Tatetothetot, the1fifi
Kyle99-Max
Oh man I am not quoting this whole thing.hewitt wrote:Okay so basically
Wrong attitude to take. Why do you think it's a good idea to write off Max, Gayle and me based solely on our attitude? Because that's really all you seem to be talking about in your comments on those those two.hewitt wrote:Wdjat- At this point I can't take anything he says all that seriously
If it helps, try reading "Elaborate" as "This point is worth discussing, but I don't feel you've backed up your opinion sufficiently. Please tell me more about your option so discourse can proceed."hewitt wrote:The "Elaborate. Elaborate. Elaborate." is really fucking annoying is almost Empking in it's useless repetition.
Man this doesn't follow at all. How does my case convince you of this?hewitt wrote:The danakillsu case is absolute crap and I don't see anything worthwhile in that little exchange except the fact that it's convinced me that voting to lynch danakillsu would be a bad idea because he's the only player I'm leaning pro-town towards.
This point is worth discussing, but I don't feel you've backed up your opinion sufficiently. Please tell me more about your option so discourse can proceed.hewitt wrote:danakillsu- The player who I feel like is most likely to be town and has reacted extremely well under pressure.
Does his history of playing in a particular way affect your scum read on him like at all or do you just like him as a lynch because you think his play is weak?hewitt wrote:Lowell- I feel like every game I play with Lowell it's the same story.