Mini 933: LRCM - Broken, restart running in new thread

EdFrost · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:01 pm

You guys are freaking creepy as hell. Can I back out now before my Amish community gets invaded?

Nope. You're stuck here until either you die or win.

(/confirm)

Fishythefish · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:51 pm

/confirm

DiscoRoboto · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:16 am

I'm afraid I'm not confirmed.

Or am I?

/dances away

UncertainKitten · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:25 am

Umu...you guys are scary!

I...I'll confirm if Kai gives me a restraining order on DT of at least 3 posts.

Sorry, my juristiction only allows restraining orders of at maximum 2 posts. That good enough for you?

SocioPath · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:27 am

Well at least DT has a Brown Kitty/Black Kitty that I can enjoy.

Seven · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:59 am

...the game hasn't even started and I'm already terrified.

Obligatory nods:

Nikanor, DTM, Dana.

*nods*

DTMaster · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:40 am

So I'm only allowed to analyze you 3 times? That seems odd. (By analyze I mean collect data and do field work research of course lol)

UncertainKitten · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:42 am

No, it just means all of your posts have to be three away from mine. Well, at least three posts after mine. Since before mine would be rather bitchy since I could set it up like I just did here to get you in trouble

.

DTMaster · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:44 am

That would be an amazingly annoying PR.

SocioPath · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:35 am

And she runs the kinds of games that would take advantage of both using the PR, and abusing it as she stated.

All you are doing is giving her ideas. ;D

UncertainKitten · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:47 am

DT wrote: That would be an amazingly annoying PR.

SP wrote: And she runs the kinds of games that would take advantage of both using the PR, and abusing it as she stated.

All you are doing is giving her ideas. ;D

Sadly, before he even said anything this was the first thing I though. I totally want to put a "Restraining order'd townie" in a game now. I'd need to figure out what precisely the mechanics and the role itself would be. Probably a tracker or something.

SocioPath · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:54 am

UncertainKitten wrote:I totally want to put a "Restraining order'd townie" in a game now. I'd need to figure out what precisely the mechanics and the role itself would be. Probably a tracker or something.

It could be a game (almost) filled with post restrictions that don't actually affect the content, but the placement of the posts.

Like you could have another 'stalker' type role that could only make posts specifically only after another specific player has posted.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:56 am

I could make this work, actually.

DiscoRoboto · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:57 am

Wow, this is like a devolved form of the RVS.

The RS.

SocioPath · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:03 am

UncertainKitten wrote:I could make this work, actually.

The only thing you'd have to be careful of is not have TOO many that have to post in a -very- specific order, or else the game would end up having the exact same players posting in the exact same order always.

...And you'd would have to make players GAURENTEE that they WILL NOT FLAKE or are players with a predetermined V/LA schedule. (Those are are always gone on weekends, those that are always gone on weekdays, etc...)

Because if the restrictions are based off of each other, everyone is going to be have to be around to make it work...and make it be a chaotic ninja posting mess (remembers /b/ mafia) to make others purposely break their PR...

Breaking PR should have less game-ended penalties (modkills losing power role abilities), and more of amusing, but still detrimental, penalties.

UncertainKitten · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:05 am

Yeah, that's probably how I'd run it. I'd have to see how it would work. Losing role abilities WOULD be a penalty for breaking PR, but probably on the third strike instead of the second.

SocioPath · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:08 am

UncertainKitten wrote:Losing role abilities WOULD be a penalty for breaking PR, but probably on the third strike instead of the second.

Thats so common and overdone though, what happened to originality?

Like for example...if a cop knows their sanity...change it every time they break PR, to an unknown one.

And if they ever figure it out again...and then they break PR again...insanity...

UncertainKitten · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:12 am

I'd have to think a lot about it. Might be fun to run sometime.

SocioPath · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:18 am

Sounds like the kinda game I'd join. ;o

Seven · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:51 pm

Did I accidentally stumble into the game theory forum?

ZazieR · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:15 pm

/confirm
(Most of the) Player list and mod is win ^.^

DTMaster · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:57 am

It's still pre-game guys ^_^

danakillsu · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:00 am

/confirm
Yay! Another game with Sociopath.

smashbro_of_the_SSS · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:59 am

confirm, sorry im so late guys.

MilesPrower · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:30 am

/confirm for Mister Kai Kai!