ZOMBIES! - Zombies take over for the win!!!

[McGriddle]

Wow.

That's pretty blatantly modkillable.

How? I linked to the setup, it didn't give anything away about either game. Nor was I refering to anything that was happening in that game.

Unvote, Vote:Reckoner

It seems like you WANT the mod to kill me, despite there being no reson to do it. Scum benefit by that.

[WRP_Beater]

Ok, to answer all of your questions about me:
I

usually

never place random votes and all of the people I

usually

play with find scummy to random vote without information. I do, too. I really haven't understood why you place them like that yet.

[manho]

@ilord, i had voted tate before, and for the reason that he refered to the sample role pm.

[ODDin]

McG: The setup in that game is

closed

. You don't know how much scum there are there. Unless, you know...

[iLord]

Ok, to answer all of your questions about me:
I usually never place random votes and all of the people I usually play with find scummy to random vote without information. I do, too. I really haven't understood why you place them like that yet.

We have information.

@ilord, i had voted tate before, and for the reason that he refered to the sample role pm.

Do you think that's the most scummy action going on? Referring to the sample role PM?

McG: The setup in that game is closed. You don't know how much scum there are there. Unless, you know...

To reiterate: McG said he's played in only 1 mini. I asked him to link me to it. It happened to be ongoing. End of story.

[CooLDoG]

Back from my weekend shopping spree, which I didn't enjoy. some other people however did, grrrr.... sorry I couldn't post yesterday.

now to my post:

Number one,
I don't think that offence is modkillable myself, never the less don't you think it should be the mod that actually kills someone? And for all of you to note, scum would be elated for a townei to get mod killed. Watch out.

#2
I forgot to unvote, sorry I just now noted that, my vote is now on wolf (sorry it shouldn't be).

unvote, vote: tate

He acted scummy, and has not posted much at all. And because that is who I wanted to vote for before.

#3
McG uhh that sounds omgus, uhhh thats no good. You could say that scum might want to mod kill you, but it seems to me that what you posted is omgus.

#4
ODD

i/b]n Re-read iLord's post, and his new one, thanks.
And on that ODDIN is a bit more figity, he smells slightly scum of his last to posts. He is being a bit to gun-how for a modkill for my taste, however I like my vote where it is for the time being.

[wolframnhart]

WRP, content. NOW.

Ok as it is this will probably be my last post until I get back from my V/LA that the mod is aware of. If I have time to post again tonight after i get back from work and before we leave I will, and if i somehow get a moment ot myself to post during my V/La i will.

I still find tate scummy, as i have said before, though my initial vote was for pressure, i still don't think any town member should be fine with having four votes on them, now five i believe. WRP is definitely pinging my scumdar, only because he is not posting anything at all really, so either he is scum or he needs to be replaced.

Let's once again drop the mod kill discussion only because if it was killable, farside would have done so already. Lets move on.

Am not looking forward to reading all the pages I will miss at this point.

[ODDin]

Ok, to answer all of your questions about me:
I

usually

never place random votes and all of the people I

usually

play with find scummy to random vote without information. I do, too. I really haven't understood why you place them like that yet.

We've moved past voting for random reasons long ago. Right now people are voting based on their analysis of the situation and what others have said and what they think is scummy.
As has been explained to you before, here on MS we usually begin by a round of random votes, called RVS (Random Voting Stage). Eventually, discussion begins to emerge and we move out of the RVS and into actual analysis and thinking.

We're on page 16. We've been out of the RVS since page 3. Actually, by the time you first posted we were already out of the RVS. So, catch up and start playing.

[farside22]

It has come to my attention a player was talking about an ongoing game. I don't feel I need to tell you people this is against MS mafia rules in general. Please do not refer to ongoing games. I will have you removed and black listed if I see this again.
Thank you.

[xRECKONERx]

Wow.

That's pretty blatantly modkillable.

How? I linked to the setup, it didn't give anything away about either game. Nor was I refering to anything that was happening in that game.

Unvote, Vote:Reckoner

It seems like you WANT the mod to kill me, despite there being no reson to do it. Scum benefit by that.

Actually, not only did you bring an ongoing game into discussion HERE, you fuckin' linked to it.

[animorpherv1]

Wow.

That's pretty blatantly modkillable.

How? I linked to the setup, it didn't give anything away about either game. Nor was I refering to anything that was happening in that game.

Unvote, Vote:Reckoner

It seems like you WANT the mod to kill me, despite there being no reson to do it. Scum benefit by that.

Actually, not only did you bring an ongoing game into discussion HERE, you fuckin' linked to it.

Reck is right. You think Reck wants you modkilled? well don't give in to temptation even if he

is

, which doesn't look like it to me, imo.

Confirm vote: McGriddle

Also, sorry for my lack of being here yesterday. My computer was having an issue my family was trying to fix.

[animorpherv1]

@McGriddle:

KMD i get since you have your vote on him, but morph? Where did that come from?

[Diamondilium]

At first, I was inclined to agree with Yossarian's catch of McGriddle's slip. Now its becoming hard to tell if he's playing dumb or actually thinks there's 2 scum in each game regardless of size. For the moment,

Unvote, Vote: McGriddle

.

Despite the fact that wolframhart posts quite often, I get the impression that he isn't really scumhunting. His entire basis (for what I take it) for voting Tate was pressure and his scum list is almost entirely comprised of lurkers. He also appears to ask a lot of questions, but it seems that he doesn't really follow up and analyze responses.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Ok, to answer all of your questions about me:
I

usually

never place random votes and all of the people I

usually

play with find scummy to random vote without information. I do, too. I really haven't understood why you place them like that yet.

What do you think about Reckoner and McGriddle?

[ODDin]

@mod: Could you prod zazie please?

DONE!

[iLord]

At first, I was inclined to agree with Yossarian's catch of McGriddle's slip. Now its becoming hard to tell if he's playing dumb or actually thinks there's 2 scum in each game regardless of size. For the moment, Unvote, Vote: McGriddle.

This makes it sound like you can't tell whether or not he's playing dumb. Why vote over ODDin?

[Diamondilium]

At first, I was inclined to agree with Yossarian's catch of McGriddle's slip. Now its becoming hard to tell if he's playing dumb or actually thinks there's 2 scum in each game regardless of size. For the moment, Unvote, Vote: McGriddle.

This makes it sound like you can't tell whether or not he's playing dumb. Why vote over ODDin?

ODDin hasn't been scummy lately.

[McGriddle]

OMG for the last time. It was a mistake.

[iLord]

ODDin hasn't been scummy lately.

So what do you think of him now?

[Diamondilium]

ODDin- neutral leaning scum. The only notable thing about him is what I voted him earlier for.

OMG for the last time. It was a mistake.

I wasn't referring to your linking to an ongoing game.

[iLord]

ODDin- neutral leaning scum. The only notable thing about him is what I voted him earlier for.

That's what I thought - what's your read of McG, then?

[Diamondilium]

ODDin- neutral leaning scum. The only notable thing about him is what I voted him earlier for.

That's what I thought - what's your read of McG, then?

Possibly neutral, or possibly scummy.

[iLord]

Possibly neutral, or possibly scummy.

What the heck is that supposed to mean? Why is McG "possibly" and ODDin not?

[Diamondilium]

Possibly neutral, or possibly scummy.

What the heck is that supposed to mean? Why is McG "possibly" and ODDin not?

Depends on if he's playing dumb or not.

[iLord]

Depends on if he's playing dumb or not.

That's the same thing as saying ODDin's scum depending on whether or not he's actually scumhunting.

Your designation "possibly" does not differentiate your McG read from your ODDin read?

Regardless, the issue I'm taking here is that you're voting McG over ODDin. The post where you voted:

At first, I was inclined to agree with Yossarian's catch of McGriddle's slip. Now its becoming hard to tell if he's playing dumb or actually thinks there's 2 scum in each game regardless of size. For the moment, Unvote, Vote: McGriddle.

The first part strongly indicates that your current opinion contrasts with Yos2's. You elaborate and say that you cannot tell whether or not the "slip" is an actual scumtell. I don't understand why you would vote a player who may or may not have any valid points against him over a player that you have a definite strike against (More specifically, a player that you're definitely leaning scum on). Additionally, you follow this up with "For the moment." Not only does this leave you open to jump off the wagon whenever convenient, it also effectively negates any pressure that your vote could cause.

What did you intend to accomplish with this vote?

Also what do you make of this post:

Yeah, we should wagon ODDin.